Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Gobble Gobble: The Biggest Box-Office Turkeys of 2011

    Turkey Day comes once a year, but in a year that's been short on big motion-picture success stories, it seems like a fresh bird has landed at the box office every weekend.

    In honor of the biggest film-going holiday on the calendar, TheWrap has assembled a list of 2011's biggest duds so far:

    THE RUM DIARY
    With Johnny Depp movies having amassed an astronomical $7.67 billion across the globe over the course of his career, this film stands out like a bad batch of hooch. Grossing just $19.1 million worldwide on a $45 million budget, it was Depp's least successful film since 1999's "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas," another movie based on the actor's close friend, the late Hunter S. Thompson. It was perhaps an even greater disappointment for director Bruce Robinson, who battled with alcohol and writer's block while penning the screenplay, and who hadn't directed a film since 1992 ("Jennifer 8").

    Also read: 'Rum Diary' One of Johnny Depp's Biggest Career Flops


    MARS NEEDS MOMS
    Disney's 3D animated comedy performed so badly at the box office, it not only convinced the studio to shutter producer Robert Zemeckis' ImageMovers Digital company, it also made the film industry second-guess the entire motion-capture filmmaking technique.

    (Steven Spielberg's "Tintin" has since pulled everyone back from the edge on that.)

    "Mars Need Moms" grossed a poultry ... er, paltry $39 million of its $190 million production budget in a huge blow to Disney's bottom line. Critics didn't like it, either. The film scored only 36 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, and the Chicago Tribune's Michael Phillips called it "one of the least visually appealing films ever to go out under the Disney banner."

    Also read: Can Steven Spielberg's 'Tintin' Save Motion-Capture Animation?


    LARRY CROWNE
    With Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts in the leading roles, this romantic comedy seemed like a sure-fire hit ...  if it had been released in, say, 1995.

    The film, which was also directed by Hanks, wasn't a huge money-loser for producer Vendome Pictures, grossing $52.4 million worldwide on a production budget of $30 million. But the rom-com -- not so affectionately known as the "Scooter Movie" because its ubiquitous key art featuring its stars on a Vespa -- didn't exactly juice the careers of Hanks, 55, or Roberts, 44.

    "Larry Crowne" drew an audience that was 81 percent above the age of 35 its opening weekend. There were "Murder She Wrote" episodes that didn't skew that old.

    Also read: 'Larry Crowne': So Flaccid It Seems Written by a Q-Tip


    COWBOYS & ALIENS 
    The graphic novel from which it was adapted was a New York Times best-seller; director Jon Favreau had a proven sci-fi/action pedigree with "Iron Man" and campaigned his heart out for the movie; Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig provided plenty of star power; and it had the executive-producer stamp of approval from none other than Steven Spielberg.

    Still, audiences couldn't get their collective heads around the genre mash-up, which featured an Old West town banding together to take down an alien invasion. The $163 million film grossed just $174.6 million globally, losing money once prints and advertising costs were factored in.

    Also read: 'Cowboys & Aliens': Yeah, There Are Cowboys ... and Aliens -- But Not Much Else


    GREEN LANTERN
    In a summer filled with men in superhero tights, audiences just didn't buy Ryan Reynolds, traditionally a goofy comic actor, as a super-empowered crime-fighter. 

    The film was produced by Warner Bros. for more than $200 million with the aim of launching a vital franchise at a time when Christopher Nolan is winding down his mega-successful "Dark Knight" series. But it only grossed $219.9 million worldwide. Despite the fact that audiences didn't gobble up the first film as much as was anticipated, Warner and DC Comics are already collaborating on a sequel.

    Read also: Too Many Men in Tights? 5 Reasons the Superhero Summer Has Been a Bust.

     

    CONAN THE BARBARIAN The reboot of this shirtless sword-fighting epic starring "Game of Thrones'" Jason Momoa in the role originated by Arnold Schwarzenegger nearly three decades ago  didn't perform nearly as well as hoped.

     The $90 million 3D film grossed just $48.8 million worldwide, and it was listed as a key piece of dead weight by executives for studio Lionsgate when they reported a $19 million quarterly operating loss earlier this month. Critical disdain also ran high for the reboot, with Rotten Tomatoes scoring it at only 23 percent. 

    Also read: 'Conan the Barbarian': Ahnuld, Where Are You Now That the Remake Needs You?

    YOUR HIGHNESS
    Director David Gordon Green had succeeded with the pot-fueled comedy sub-genre before with "Pineapple Express," but this R-rated comedy was a real bummer, grossing only $25 million on a $50 million budget. Universal released the film in April, just a few months after co-star Natalie Portman won an Oscar, and moviegoers scratched their heads when her name appeared in the marquee. They also wondered what co-star James Franco was smoking when he showed up in another pot comedy after rumors circulated that he was stoned while hosting the Academy Awards.

    Also read: James Franco Dazed at the Oscars? You Shoulda Seen Rehearsal

    THE DILEMMA
    One of two poor-performing Kevin James vehicles this year (along with "Zookeeper"), this adult comedy was perhaps an even greater disappointment for director/producer Ron Howard, who hadn't made a comedy since 2000's "How the Grinch Stole Christmas." It didn't lose a ton of money for Howard's Imagine Entertainment and studio Universal, grossing $69.7 million on a budget of around $70 million. But publicity-wise, it was more trouble than it was worth, thanks to a trailer that showed co-star Vince Vaughn's character calling such things as hybrid cars "gay."

     Also read: Universal Pulls Gay Slur from 'Dilemma' Trailer; May Remain in Film

     

    THE BIG YEAR
    This PG comedy about bird watchers, which starred Jack Black, Owen Wilson and Steve Martin, ended up on the turkey list based on an anemic $7.1 million gross at the box office against a $41 million production budget. Director David Frankel had scored previously with "The Devil Wears Prada" and "Marley and Me," but none of those movies' charms seemed to be on display here, with critics aggregating Fox's "Big Year" at 39 percent on Rotten Tomatoes. 

    Also read: Review: Owen Wilson's Bird-Watching 'Big Year' Neither Soars Nor Lays an Egg


    THE THING
    This European-produced prequel to John Carpenter's acclaimed 1982 sci-fi/horror film with the same title failed to connect with U.S. audiences, grossing just $16.9 million domestically and $19 million worldwide on a $38 million production spend. While Carpenter's "Thing" benefited from the grizzled heroics of actor Kurt Russell -- fresh off his action-movie breakout in the director's "Escape From New York" -- the new movie had little in the way of star power, with Joel Edgerton ("Warrior') among the few recognizable names in the marquee. Critics didn't flock to the film, either, scoring it at 33 percent fresh on Rotten Tomatoes.

    Also read: Universal and Morgan Creek to Co-Finance 'The Thing'

     

    2,561 comments

    • donald  •  6 months ago
      ever since the writers strike about 5 years ago, all the studios are making more sequels so they don't have to pay for a good story.....its all about the money...
      • Chris 6 months ago
        I was worried I was the only one that noticed that,all the writer`s got a huge wage increase now they`re all rich fat and lazy it would seem.Transformers is the perfect example.
      • "King of the Cowboys ... 6 months ago
        If it is about the money, why are they making movies that lose money? Doesn't make sense, partner...
      • Dan M 6 months ago
        there hasn't been anything original in decades. the writers didn't deserve a raise, they should have been fired.
    • Doghouse Riley  •  6 months ago
      I just can't stand to pay $17 for a ticket to be in a room with rude, obnoxious people who talk on their phones, text, kick the back of my seat and get up and down all movie long. I hate to sound like an grouchy old man but I'd rather stay home and watch old movies on TCM.
      • dontcare 6 months ago
        I feel the same. And I am a grouchy old man.
      • Doghouse Riley 6 months ago
        I'm a grouchy old man in training. My girlfriend nicknamed me "Crusty." :D
      • kynikos 6 months ago
        Seventeen bucks? Holy Whatever! The last time I went to the cinema, the price here in the Seattle area was $8.50. I thought that to be high and haven’t been back since. I guess I don’t really need to “get out more.” Don’t train too hard on the “grouchy old man” thing. You will find that it comes naturally. Let it age - like a fine whine.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  6 months ago
      Movies have gone the way of today's music. Formulated synthesized garbage that only exists because of hype. The music is painful to listen to and the movies unbearable to watch overall.
    • jk  •  6 months ago
      I rarely watch comedy anymore,...its as if they forgot how to be funny and subsitute it with gross.
      • A-non-o-miss 6 months ago
        JK YOU HIT THE MARK!!!!!!! comedy today IS NOT REAL COMEDY!!!! it seems that today comedy consists of being completely stupid, ignorant, dumb, and gross all while either being high or trying to get high! How the F is that even remotely funny?? Hollywood needs to get off their #$%$ and start challenging people who make so-called comedies when they are not funny!!! and lower the #$%$ ticket prices!!!!
      • A Yahoo! User 6 months ago
        agreed, and same with these chick flicks. i refuse to pay out 15.00 for a movie i know how it will play out. girl meets boy, both hate each other (or love eac other but are with other people), something happens and the movie ends with the 2 characters falling in love
    • williamb  •  6 months ago
      How about something original that I'm willing to spend money on instead of gross out and drug jokes, or something rehashed. A plot would be good and so would dialogue. Remember those hollywood?
      • JSAer24 6 months ago
        Because that doesn't make money. Welcome to capitalism, where art is subjugated to the dollar.
      • Me 6 months ago
        I just can't stomach Julia Roberts laugh in one more movie... I refuse to pay to hear her phony laugh that every directore feels obligiated to put in a movie.
      • Brian 6 months ago
        Something original? LOL Hollywood doesn't know the meaning of the word.
    • Yup  •  6 months ago
      I am a bit confused....over 35 is now the AARP geriatric viewing public. Was this article (like so many others on Yahoo) written by a junior in high school? If I remember correctly, the greater portion of the population world wide is over 35 years of age. In America, that is one of the reasons for the future concern regarding social security (the aging population). When movie makers start to figure out that this population fact and begin making movies that this age group can relate to...then they might get folks back into the theaters. Oh...they will need to get those "family of four costing $100 to see a movie" ticket prices lowered though.
      • Yu-Yo 6 months ago
        In Mexico the largest age group are people between the ages of 20 and 35. There's now more people over age 65 than under age 9 in Mexico and the amount of older people just keeps on getting bigger. Still.. a movie with Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts on a scooter probably wouldn't interest me.
      • LeeB 6 months ago
        Most movies today are geared to the under 25 group.
      • LHD 6 months ago
        I'd say teenagers and young, childless adults watch movies on TV, internet or rental. The movie goers are older people and families with young children.
    • Mike  •  6 months ago
      Stop all the 3-D nonsense. It does nothing to improve any film.
    • mitch  •  6 months ago
      Well written and well acted are a rarity in Hollywood anymore. We (ancient) adults realize that what makes kiddies excited, is worthless CGI special effects that can be done without any actors at all. All the flash and hype will never take the place of acting and writing. But, sadly, those days seem to be slipping past. Comically, I can imagine my parents/grandparents saying the same things when Star Wars/Star Trek movies came out. Will our children be reminiscing to their kids about when movies were 2D and not holographic or virtual encompassing reality?
    • mike K  •  6 months ago
      I saw the Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts trailer, and I couldn't wait until it ended! That's a pretty good indication that a movie sucks. Another topic: Will Ferrell - Had enough of him yet?
    • Travis  •  6 months ago
      I must agree with most of you...Movies have fallen so low in quality that there is NO justification for spending that much money to sit in a theatre full of loud, unruly teens. Try comparing any of the modern films with classics like "The Maltese Falcon", "The Searchers", or "Shane"...there is NO comparison possible!!! Thank God for DVDs from Blockbuster, & the Premium channels of DISH, we can watch movies at home, eat free popcorn, smoke, and change it if we don't like it.
    • _  •  6 months ago
      Kevin James, Jack Black, Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson are the same character in every single movie. To see one of their movies is to see all of them. Why would anyone bother to pay money to see the same schtick over and over?
    • LadyZen  •  6 months ago
      The quality of movies now is terrible. They use too much CGI and actors just don't have to act anymore. The Bourne movies were quite good as the stunts were real, (not cgi) the plot and acting quality was superb. Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible was a joke. Flying into a bullet train at speed is so unrealistic, it reminds me of an animated feature. The salaries of the A-list actors is obscene. They get paid regardless if the movie bombs or is a hit.
    • California Kid  •  6 months ago
      Hollywood is at an all time low..That's because it's run by board members..All the movies have to be the same and there is no room for creativity..If Marilyn Monroe was alive and in her prime they would cast her in SAW # 6, screaming
    • Salinas diner  •  6 months ago
      Oh my goodness...so the "ancient" crowd of over 35 year olds is what helped "sink" Larry Crowne??? When did the over 35 year old crowd start becoming automatic members of AARP?? PLUS, doesn't the over 35 year old bunch spend money that looks just like the greenbacks the UNDER 35 year old crowd spend??
    • Anthony  •  6 months ago
      While we're on the subject of things not as good as they used to be, since when did the TV "season" suddenly drop to just 4 or 5 episodes before the "midseason" finale suddenly airs , then, NOTHING for 3 months til the next 4 or 5 episodes to "end" the season??!! I remember not that long ago, TV seasons anywhere from 14 to 20 episodes long, with just some breaks for the holidays!!
    • maximum impact  •  6 months ago
      save your money and read a book
    • Dennis  •  6 months ago
      2011 has been such a boring year in movies. Why? Coz I find myself downloading movies from the 70s, 80s and 90s just to keep myself entertained. Hollywood has definitely ran out of ideas.
    • Pat M  •  6 months ago
      Movies suck . Too expensive for the ticket the food and all the rude people you have to put up with talking and texting. I am not cheap my wife and I both make really good money but we chose to get a really really good home system and a netflix subscription it's so much better. With how good todays systems and TV's are, the movies really arean't better with everything involed.
    • We the people  •  6 months ago
      Theater inflation will kill the film industry.
    • Cyn  •  6 months ago
      If you want to see a good cowboys and aliens film, watch Serenity. Long live Firefly!

    News for You

    • ‘The Great Gatsby’ trailer has not-so-great typo

      Movie Talk - Thu, May 24, 2012 3:08 PM EDT

      Sometimes spell-checker just isn't enough, old sport. In the new trailer for Baz Luhrmann's "The Great Gatsby," there's a pretty epic typo. A quick shot of Times Square in New York reveals a billboard for the Broadway review of "Zeigfeld … Continue reading →

    • ‘Star Wars’: Its modest opening day 35 years ago

      Movie Talk - 2 hours 7 minutes ago

      Thirty-five years ago, Hollywood changed forever. "Star Wars" hit cinemas on May 25, 1977. But, while the film went on to be one of the biggest blockbusters of all time and launched sequels, prequels, TV shows, action figures, LEGO sets, … Continue reading →

    • Catwoman leaps out in new ‘Dark Knight Rises’ TV spots

      Movie Talk - Thu, May 24, 2012 1:02 PM EDT

      Two new television spots for "The Dark Knight Rises" have been released and one of them (above) accentuates Catwoman's role. Catwoman (Anne Hathaway) takes off with Bruce Wayne's car, much to his surprise, speeding away while wearing a self-pleased smirk. … Continue reading →