Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    J.K. Rowling has deal for new novel for adults

    NEW YORK (AP) — Adult fans of J.K. Rowling can rejoice: She has a new novel coming, for grownups.

    The kids will have to wait and see.

    The author of the mega-selling "Harry Potter" series has an agreement with Little, Brown in the United States and Britain to release her first adult novel, the publishers announced Thursday. The title, release date and details about the book, long rumored, were not announced. A neighbor of Rowling's in Edinburgh, author Ian Rankin, tweeted Thursday that he thinks Rowling has written a mystery novel.

    "Wouldn't it be funny if J.K. Rowling's first novel for adults turned out to be a crime story set in Edinburgh?" Rankin wrote. "My word yes."

    Her seventh and final Potter story came out in 2007, and in recent years the British author has said that she was working on an adult book and on a Potter encyclopedia. Rowling's Potter books, which broke sales records around the world, were published by Bloomsbury in Britain and Scholastic in the U.S. Rowling will now share the same publisher with Stephenie Meyer, whose "Twilight" series at least partially filled the gap opened by the conclusion of the Potter stories.

    "Although I've enjoyed writing it every bit as much, my next book will be very different to the Harry Potter series, which has been published so brilliantly by Bloomsbury and my other publishers around the world," Rowling, 46, said in a statement released by Little, Brown. "The freedom to explore new territory is a gift that Harry's success has brought me, and with that new territory it seemed a logical progression to have a new publisher. I am delighted to have a second publishing home in Little, Brown, and a publishing team that will be a great partner in this new phase of my writing life."

    Rowling's agent, Neil Blair, would not disclose financial details of the deal but said there had been no auction. He said Thursday that Rowling was remaining with Bloomsbury in Britain for the Harry Potter books.

    "As her new book is for a different audience, and marks a new literary direction for her, it made sense to separate the two and for her new book to be launched by a different publisher," said Blair.

    Blair became Rowling's literary agent last year when she left the Christopher Little Literary Agency, where Blair had worked. Bloomsbury said its 15-year relationship with Rowling "remains stronger than ever" — and new editions of the seven novels were on the way. Some 450 million copies of the seven Potter stories are in print and the books have been translated into 74 languages. A billion-dollar movie franchise, starring Daniel Radcliffe as the young wizard, ended last year.

    "We are pleased to announce that as part of our long term strategy for Harry Potter we intend to publish illustrated editions of all seven Harry Potter books in a rolling program from 2013 onwards in addition to our partnership on e-books with the Pottermore website," the publisher said in a statement. In the U.S., Scholastic spokeswoman Kyle Good noted that Scholastic didn't publish adult books.

    "We will continue to publish her children's books in the U.S.," Good said Thursday.

    Any Rowling book would seem a guaranteed million seller, although it's questionable that her new novel will have the same mass appeal as Potter. Adult authors from E.B. White to Sherman Alexie have nicely managed the transition to writing for young people but, once a writer is defined as a children's author, the transition can be tricky. Winnie the Pooh creator A.A. Milne, a successful playwright in his early years, once confessed that he was forced to say "goodbye to all that" after his beloved books about the bear and friends. Margaret Wise Brown, author of the classic "Goodnight Moon," tried for years to write stories for The New Yorker.

    Daniel Handler of "Lemony Snicket" fame and Ann Brashares, author of the "Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" novels, are among the recent popular writers for children who have had limited success as adult writers.

    But Rowling does begin with one advantage: The Potter books had an enormous following among readers of all ages and she is widely credited with revealing to publishers that children's books were no longer just for the young. Meyer's vampire novels and Suzanne Collins' "Hunger Games" trilogy also have caught on with both parents and kids. Meyer herself wrote an adult book, "The Host," a best-seller in 2008.

    "It would just be cool if my existing fans liked it," Meyer told The Associated Press in 2008. "And I hope to get some new readers who would never go into the YA (Young Adult) shelves."

    Beth Puffer, director of the Manhattan-based children's bookseller Bank Street Bookstore, said she'd have to see the novel before deciding where or whether to stock it.

    "I assume if it's written for adults, it's not appropriate for children," said Puffer, who added that she might stock the book in a section for ages 14 and up. "There are a lot of former children and young adults who grew up with Harry Potter and they would likely be an audience for her new book. You also have all the adults who loved the Potter books."

    One of Rowling's most passionate fans, Melissa Anelli, said she was beyond herself "with excitement." Anelli, 32, runs a leading Potter/Rowling fan site, http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org .

    "J.K. Rowling is simply a great writer, and no matter what she applies her talents to, we will anticipate and enjoy it," Anelli wrote in an email. "I'm also so intrigued by this process: What will happen as the world's greatest children's/YA author navigates the new publishing landscape and publishes for a new audience?"

    Rowling's novel will be available in both print and electronic formats. The author held out for years on allowing the Potter books to come out digitally, but announced in 2011 that Potter e-books would be sold through her own "Pottermore" website. The books were supposed to become available last fall, but have been delayed until sometime this year.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Jill Lawless in London contributed to this report.

     

    696 comments

    • Kevin H  •  3 months ago
      Two points: 1- I read the Harry Potter books as an adult, and loved them. 2 - Twilight in no way fills the gap of Harry Potter.
      • Michael 3 months ago
        Agreed. I've seen a couple of the Twilight movies, never even bothered with the books, and will say with full confidence, Twilight has nothing on Harry Potter.
      • ehukai 3 months ago
        both we called by the devil.
      • Kristin 3 months ago
        Absolutely! I enjoyed the Twilight books somewhat, but they don't compare to the fabulous Potter series. It's like when the media kept comparing the "boy band" craze to Beatlemania. Yes, they were both wildly popular, but that does not put them on the same playing field!
    • ErikI  •  Chico, California  •  3 months ago
      To be fair, J.K. Rowling has already been at least partially transitioning. Compare Harry Potter 1 to Harry Potter 7 and tell me you don't see the difference.
      • A Yahoo! User 3 months ago
        I agree there is no diffrence, they ALL S U C K!!
      • Aubrey 3 months ago
        Erikl I agree 100% and that is part of what I love about the HP series. They grew appropriately in content with the characters.
      • Michael Griffith 3 months ago
        that's very true. The Deathly Hallows seems more for adults as the first novel seemed to be for the younger readers. I can't wait to see what JK comes out with next...but I do admit I still want an 8th Potter book :)
    • Missa  •  3 months ago
      She's a decent writer and I'll look forward to reading what she brings out next. However, I hope everyone doesn't rush to judgement if the new book doesn't live up to "Potter standards". The Harry Potter series was a once-in-a-lifetime thing. I think comparing what's "new" to what's "old" would be like comparing apples and oranges.
      • Bruno 3 months ago
        You could compare the successes of different adventure themed books.

        Now the three big, modern series are:
        -Harry Potter
        -Twilight
        -The Hunger Games

        Can't wait to read what's next.
      • Missa 3 months ago
        Oh I agree ... "gendre" comparison would be appropriate. But often times, when a writer [artist, actor, whatever] has an absolutely smashing success, then from that time on everything is compared to their previous "success" ... sort of like, "yeah, but what have you done for me lately". I just think every new endeavor ought to be judged on its own merits.
      • willg 3 months ago
        I disagree I would say the big three, pun intended, would be:
        -Harry Potter
        -Percy Jackson
        -Twilight
    • Jonathan  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength and doing
      what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it
      is to have a boyfriend." - Stephen King
      • Katyusha 3 months ago
        well, it's important.
      • Sssnakey 3 months ago
        Stephen King should talk. Heck, he had a couple of good books and coasted on his reputation the rest of the time.
      • Amanda 3 months ago
        Have you read any of King's books lately, Sssnakey? The last few he came out with were some of his best...
    • Giz  •  3 months ago
      The last couple of Harry Potter books were not children's books. That series transitioned itself as the people who read the first book as children, grew into young adults. Also, my father read those books and loved them. So did many of the well educated adults I know. They were FANTASTIC books. I'm 28, so I was in my late teens when the series started and I've read and enjoyed them all. Stephanie Meyers isn't a comparison. Her books aren't even good enough to be considered insipid supermarket romance novels.

      I don't think JK Rowling will have any issue with this transition. I know I'll buy the book.
      • Blair 3 months ago
        i love this comment
      • Tiffeny 3 months ago
        Here is the thing they were not comparing who writes better, because yes we all know the Harry Potter books were much more advanced as far as writeing skills go (not that stephanie cant write), but as far as what story is better that is to each his own opinion i personally loved both series for different reasons. We all see things different and have different interests. Now this article was only compareing factual evidence that twilight filled in the gap financially and popularity wise. That basically in easier words harry potter number one, twilight number two with popularity and makeing money. That was the only honest comparison made:)
      • Chip 3 months ago
        I agree! I'm almost done re-reading Deathly Hallows (I haven't read it since 2007) and I never realized how adult that book is. I've actually re-read the entire series in order again, finishing it off with this one, and the journey through the books is incredible. I literally feel like I AM Harry growing up through this story.
    • idamannowdog  •  Louisville, Kentucky  •  3 months ago
      All of the Harry Potter readers grew up with the book series, so now she needs to write adult novels for them.
    • RA  •  3 months ago
      Twilight partially filled the gap after the seventh book of Harry Potter came out? EXCUSE ME?! What are you smoking to think that Stephanie Meyer has writing chops anywhere near Jo Rowling? I've read both series in their entirety, and there is a reason I continue to read Harry Potter every year and took the Twilight books to the library to get rid of them. As Stephen King said "Harry Potter is about confronting fears, finding inner strength and doing
      what is right in the face of adversity. Twilight is about how important it is to have a boyfriend." I really can't summarize it any better than that.
    • Chuck  •  3 months ago
      I hope it's not about vampires.
    • nathan  •  Minneapolis, Minnesota  •  3 months ago
      Harry Potter is about kids growing up and learning things to live in the 'real world'. Twilight is 'does my boyfriend like me?' And theres this thing call necrophilia, and a 23 year old wanting to date a 3 year old and lets not forget Vampires that sparkle.Yea Harry Potter is better than Twilight.
    • kf  •  3 months ago
      Ah, but she is not defined as a children's book author. Her books are marketed and sold to adults as well as children all over the world and even have covers (in Europe at least) designed for adult readers. She is one of those few writers with universal appeal.
    • Chiio  •  Monterey, California  •  3 months ago
      How are you comparing J.K to Meyer.... Even Stephen King said, "the real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer, and Stephenie Meyer can't write worth a darn. She's not very good."

      Seriously Yahoo...?
    • The Mindful Lunatic  •  3 months ago
      This new book is for adults? How is Harry Potter not for adults? I have enjoyed them all as an adult! Having been an adult for a while prior to their release, I still enjoyed them thoroughly! Besides, you cannot avoid growing old! Growing up on the other hand is totally optional!
    • Just Say'in  •  3 months ago
      Adult books versus young readers books mean adult books have sex, profanity, extreme violence, etc. Did it occur to you that is why "adult" readers fell in love with "Potter"? Rowling gave us the "meat" of the story without the unnecessary ridiculous "Slap the vulgar in you face" garbage so many writers do and SO many real adult readers are so weary of. What I admire about her, along with being a wonderful story teller is she never "dumbed down" her vocabulary for the young reader audience. Hence, making great readers and writers for the future of our young! Can't wait for her next books!
    • Leslie  •  3 months ago
      Stephanie Meyers is an amatuer compared to JK Rowling. When I read the Twilight series I thought a 10 grader wrote it.
    • Jonathan S  •  3 months ago
      I personally would like her to at some point down the road write a 3-4 series on the first war with Tom Riddle and the original Order of the Phoenix. The series would end with Harry's parents being killed and having him placed into hiding where the first one ended. Sort of how Episode III ended with Star Wars but it wouldn't suck.

      Would anyone else like to see that? I know I would.
    • Michelle  •  3 months ago
      How did an article about JK Rowling publishing a new book end up as a plug for Stephanie Meyer. These two writers are incomparable. Another Yahoo fail.
    • Manny  •  3 months ago
      People forget that those who read her books as kids are now young adults and will probably flock to the stores for their childhood favorite writer now writing for adults.
    • Keith  •  3 months ago
      Real vampires don't sparkle. Real vampires are dead creatures, and being dead they do not eat or sleep or have any living cells, including spermatazoa. Therefore they do not have children, nor do they have emotions or compassion. Twilight is porn for 12 year old girls. That is all.
    • EB03  •  New York, New York  •  3 months ago
      I can't wait. She's a brilliant writer. I'd probably read anything this woman releases.
    • Amysue  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      You just insulted half the readers and JK Rowling by saying Twilight filled the gap. -.-

    News for You

    • ‘The Great Gatsby’ trailer has not-so-great typo

      Movie Talk - Thu, May 24, 2012 3:08 PM EDT

      Sometimes spell-checker just isn't enough, old sport. In the new trailer for Baz Luhrmann's "The Great Gatsby," there's a pretty epic typo. A quick shot of Times Square in New York reveals a billboard for the Broadway review of "Zeigfeld … Continue reading →

    • ‘Star Wars’: Its modest opening day 35 years ago

      Movie Talk - 1 hour 58 minutes ago

      Thirty-five years ago, Hollywood changed forever. "Star Wars" hit cinemas on May 25, 1977. But, while the film went on to be one of the biggest blockbusters of all time and launched sequels, prequels, TV shows, action figures, LEGO sets, … Continue reading →

    • Catwoman leaps out in new ‘Dark Knight Rises’ TV spots

      Movie Talk - Thu, May 24, 2012 1:02 PM EDT

      Two new television spots for "The Dark Knight Rises" have been released and one of them (above) accentuates Catwoman's role. Catwoman (Anne Hathaway) takes off with Bruce Wayne's car, much to his surprise, speeding away while wearing a self-pleased smirk. … Continue reading →