| Overall Grade: |
A- |
|
| Story: |
A- |
|
|
| Acting: |
A |
|
|
| Direction: |
B+ |
|
|
| Visuals: |
B |
|
|
Could quentin be a better psycho?
by Jimbo13 (movies profile)
Feb 24, 2007
6
of
8 people found this review helpful
This movie had two stories combined into one the clooney & tarantino robberies was one story and then there's the vampire story. The theft story had nothing to do with the vampire other than the killing of clooneys dear brother. The only thing that bothered me was how short the night was but what else could you add into it. The style of the brothers at the begining was perfect the way they took out that clerk right there it showed the wit of clooney and how unstable tarantino was but the way clooney knew how to take care of his brother showed that he was always incharge. Before the coming upon of quentins quick death he had a little glimpse of shining which came to his death. Keitel and his family did a good job especially the kmong kid they gave no fame to. Due to the conversion of keitel and the conversion of samuel jackson in "Pulp Fiction" you could only assume Quentin went throgh that one period of his life. The graphics of the vampires wasn't any comparison to movies like "Blade" but did they mean to be. I don't think the point of the movie was about vampires more about beleif. |
My Public Profile 
