| Overall Grade: |
A- |
|
| Story: |
N/A |
|
|
| Acting: |
N/A |
|
|
| Direction: |
N/A |
|
|
| Visuals: |
N/A |
|
|
The eschatology of the movie is Biblical
by Erich (movies profile)
May 31, 2005
1
of
2 people found this review helpful
The overall eschatology of the story is Biblically plausible. Probably better Biblically then, the old, "Thief in the Night Series", or the two series by Cloud Ten Picture, "Revelation Series" and "Left Behind Series". Michael York as Stone Alexander does a fine acting job. Casper Van Dien as Dr. Lane was good. The facial expressions of Dominic by Michael Ironside were tremendous. My favorite acting job were by the character actors that played the two wittnesses or Prophets of God, there acting was A+. There were moments where the acting could have been better. The movie was written well. The movie did fairly well at the box office because it was entertaining.
The other reviewers are looking for more action and special effects, (the special effects were very cheesy...the homosexual guy that reviewed this really wanted the action). As a Christian I don't need that stuff to make a movie good. The reason this movie is so good to me is because it is Biblical plausible. If you want to see great special effects without Biblical plausibility see Omega Code II, that is the movie for you and the other reviewers like Lozenge, and Tonto the Gay Indian, not for me.
P.S. If I were a gay indian I would report the guy to Yahoo as abusive. |
My Public Profile 
