Lower Learning
Welcome to Geraldine Ferraro Elementary, where the
teachers are drunk, lazy, or psychotic, every child has been left
behind, and burned-out Vice Principal Tom Willoman (Jason Biggs) is
barely holding on. But when totally hot district inspector Rebecca
Seabrook (Eva Longoria Parker) arrives to shut down the school, she
and Tom hatch a plan to take back the classrooms from insanely corrupt
Principal Billings (Rob Corddry). What tragedy in Willoman’s
past has turned him into a complete wuss? How did Nyquil shots and
boxing matches become proper teaching tools? Monica Potter and Will
Sasso co-star in this twisted comedy about the perils of public
education.
This is Mark Lafferty’s first effort as director and
screenwriter for a feature film. He sure has crafted a clunky plot
based on a story by Shahin Chandrasoma. While the crisis of the school
closure is developing, Lafferty focuses on the quirky frustrations of
the teaching staff; in fact, that is the focus of most of the movie. A
newly divorced teacher sits in front of her class, twisting her hair
and bemoaning life. One kid asks why doesn’t she teach
something, and she tells him to screw off. I guess it’s kind of
interesting, but it’s also kind of slow and boring. It reminded
me of a college acting class I took years ago from a great teacher,
Terra Pressler, when she once proclaimed, “acting bored plays as
boring.” She was and is right about that.
A
physical education teacher is so heartbroken from his busted marriage
he stages fights between his students as he rages on the side. Two
other teachers play a forced flirting game that is more goofball than
anything. Ehh. Psychotic principal Billings is increasingly
contemptuous towards every living creature and Willoman is left trying
to figure out how to save the school from demise. But is this story
worth saving?
After a while I realized that it’s best to try to enjoy this
film as a spoof of school comedies. It’s rated R because of
raunchy language and scenarios of teachers flipping out. All the
actors do their best, and I was actually entertained by them all in
their independent performances. The best moments are when Rob Corddry
is onscreen. Corddry’s energy and acid tongue liven things up
the most as he chews the scenes. Yet he acts like he has an undefined
ax to grind… what is he so mad about?
Lafferty
can seemingly let the actors ad lib some of their scenes, which
sometimes turns a little David-Lynchian, but the wackiness of it all,
including the far out dialogue, had me laughing. Some of the
individual parts of this film are much better than the whole, which
falls on its face. Hard.
Critics and even the public put a fork in this film and it’s
not difficult to discover why. Parts of the film really demand that
you are “on its wavelength” to get the humor. I approach
comedy always braced by the simple fact that it is the most difficult
genre to pull off. If I can laugh hard at a minimum of three fresh
jokes or scenarios, I’m barely okay with slogging through the
crappiest of stories. This film accomplished that but the funny bone
was barely tickled; sure, I laughed a few times but never a good belly
laugh.
The comedy here isn’t cliché, it
will simply veer off into weird places that can leave one scratching
one’s head. Lafferty may have ‘laffed and had a good time
during the making of this film, but his next project needs to have
some traction as well as some teeth.
The Video:
How Does The Disc Look?
The film’s
theatrical aspect ratio of 2.40:1 is presented in anamorphic
video. The film quality is very clean with little if any
artifacts or blemishes. Colors are very saturated, though scenes can
look a tad hazy at times. Fleshtones look proper, although the strong
saturation of colors can make people appear slightly painted, but this
is splitting hairs because hues look great overall. Contrast is well
balanced with very deep blacks, a solid midrange, and clean whites
that never bloom. This allows for some very good depth in well-lit
scenes. Small object detail looks quite good, and finely grained
textures in close-ups fair decently. A few moments of minimal edge
halos do emerge. Some darker scenes do display more grain, such as the
principal’s office with the smoky backlighting. For the most
part, the video quality is a solid contender.
The Audio: How Does The Disc Sound?
The disc includes a Dolby Digital 5.1 track. The audio is clean and
fairly realistic, but the dynamic range is average. Granted, the film
is a comedy and not necessarily intended for an impressive sonic
experience. The mix is front heavy, but has some front directional
effects that enhance the film. With unnoticeable ADR, dialogue is very
well recorded; I never had to engage subtitles. Surrounds exhibit
faint life and discrete activity isn’t audible. Perhaps an
emphasis on the pattering of children’s feet in the halls, wind
in the courtyard, and other effects could have been highlighted in the
audio mix, but alas, we’re left with an ordinary, bland
track.
No other audio tracks are included. As for
subtitles, there is optional English SDH.
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
Extras include the featurette The ABC’s Of
LOWER LEARNING: Behind the Scenes (14 minutes), which shows some
behind the scenes footage as well as interviews with key cast members
and director & writer Mark Lafferty. Lafferty seems very easy
going and inclusive while working with his actors and extras. Some of
the performers crack some funny quips.
Next up are
deleted scenes and outtakes (a healthy 26 minutes).
There are 10 of these scenes and they are funny to watch. Most of them
are sluggish, but they have their funny moments. The first one
Chocolate Bath shouldn’t be missed, however, it’s
bizarre.
Theatrical trailers include:
The Grand and Lower Learning.
The 97-
minute film is organized into sixteen chapters.
Exclusive DVD-ROM Features: What happens when you pop the disc into
your PC?
There are no DVD-ROM features on this
DVD.
Final Thoughts
With a corrupt school on the brink of collapse, a vice principal tries
to rally the students and staff to save it from the clutches of an
underhanded, psychotic principal. Some of the weird humor is funny,
but the wobbly story and spoof-like handing of the film are hard to
digest. The picture quality is fine, audio is bland, and some
supplements are not bad. Mostly recommended if you are fans of the
actors otherwise, you’re on your own.
|