Seems like 2007 will go down as the year
everyone in Hollywood attempted to make a political statement on
America’s involvement in the War of Terror. Of course, few of
these films actually caught the public’s fancy or earned
overwhelming critical accolades. One of the more successful attempts,
albeit a shallow and vapid one, was director Peter Berg’s
adrenaline-pumped The Kingdom. At the opposite end of the
spectrum is Robert Redford’s preachy Lions for Lambs,
which is ultimately overbearing and more than a little didactic.
Ironically enough, both films are credited to the same screenwriter:
Matthew Michael Carnahan.Boasting a trio of top-tier
marquee names, Lions for Lambs attempts to weave together a
triptych of tales intended to show how the impact of war affects
people on all levels – from the political powers in charge, to
the boots on the ground, to the seemingly indifferent and apathetic
Americans at home. The first point in this triangle centers on yuppie
Republican Senator Jasper Irving (Tom Cruise), who calls in reporter
Janine Roth (Meryl Streep) to give her an exclusive scoop about the
new plan of attack he’s recommended for implementation in
Afghanistan. Two of the soldiers involved in this new strategic
offensive are recent college drop-outs Ernest Rodriguez (Michael Pena)
and Arian Finch (Derek Luke), who soon find themselves stranded and
under enemy fire when their mission goes horribly wrong.
Meanwhile, back at home their former political science professor
Stephen Malley (Robert Redford) schedules an early-morning meeting
with a slacker student named Todd Hayes (Andrew Garfield) in a
desperate attempt to impress upon him how important it is to make an
effort and attend classes. Apparently Professor Malley is compelled to
get Todd in line because he feels guilty after failing to make the
same impression on both Ernest and Arian, the soldiers who dropped out
and enlisted in the Army after doing research for a debate project in
his class. A Vietnam veteran himself, Professor Malley seems all-too-
eager to instruct his students to “do as I say” rather
than “do as I do.”
The stakes are increased
when Ernest and Arian’s commanding officer, Lieutenant Falco
(Peter Berg), is unable to get a rescue team out to his men, and the
implied mastermind behind the debacle – Senator Irving himself
– gets distracting telephone calls about the mission’s
progress which he brushes off while attempting to spoon-feed his own
positive spin on the ordeal to the compliant reporter in his office.
Faced with a crisis of conscience after realizing Senator Irving is
just using her to deliver his propaganda, Janine meets with her editor
and attempts to nix the story. While the specific circumstances
depicted in the film are largely fabricated, there are enough veiled
references to 9/11, the lack of support given to the troops abroad,
and even tell-tale phrases like “mission accomplished” and
“whatever it takes” to make the message loud and clear. It
may not be as obvious as a Michael Moore documentary, but it certainly
wears its bleeding heart on its sleeve.
Despite the
film’s ultimate failure to tie together all these loose ends,
Cruise turns in another atypical performance here which is quite good.
His broad grin and effortless charm are perfectly-suited for the sly
and cunning GOP Senator who couches everything he says within ready-
made catch-phrases. He’s actually very credible in the role and
does a great job at maintaining a poker face when Streep challenges
some of his more outlandish statements. Likewise, Streep is well-cast
as the seasoned but disillusioned reporter who struggles with the
conflict between getting a great story and serving as a tool of the
government. The one big disappointment is Redford, whose wise, old
professor sounds like he belongs behind a pulpit instead of a desk. He
does redeem himself a bit in the director’s chair, however,
wisely choosing to keep things moving at a brisk pace while building a
nice rhythm between the three simultaneous stories being told.
The Video: How Does The Disc Look?
The film’s 2.40:1 aspect ratio is presented in
a frustratingly dark and flawed anamorphic transfer. In the spirit of
full disclosure, this is my first experience reviewing one of the
notorious “advance screener” DVDs from Fox of which
I’ve read other reviewers complain. I can only assume and hope
that the severe compression artifacts and macroblocking evident during
the opening promo for Valkyrie, as just one example, have
been corrected for the commercial release. It was both difficult and
annoying to watch. While most of the film proper – the scenes of
Redford meeting with his student and the one-on-one interview between
Streep and Cruise – looks better, virtually all of the nighttime
sequences involving the stranded soldiers are so dark that the image
is almost indiscernible. I could only tell what was happening when
occasional gunfire momentarily lit up the screen. Colors also tended
to skew a bit on the yellow side, fleshtones appeared hot, and the
image seemed a bit soft overall. The bonus material looked even less
appealing and doesn’t appear to have been properly flagged as
interlaced for video. This is a real shoddy video presentation and
hopefully isn’t at all representative of the final DVD
release.
The Audio: How Does The Disc Sound?
Thankfully, the disc fares far better in the sound
department. While it offers a solid and well-balanced Dolby Digital
5.1 audio track, the real star here is the punchy and more
encompassing DTS 5.1 option. Granted, most of the film is dialogue-
heavy, but the DTS soundstage offers a sharper and well-defined center
channel while allowing for occasional surround and stereo effects to
catch you by surprise, such as when the aforementioned gunshots echo
out or when the whirring helicopters deploy the troops during their
mission. Mark Isham’s poignant score gets to shine a bit more
during the film’s big climax, but otherwise it remains somewhat
subtle and low-key throughout. Overall, this is a good if not
demonstration-level audio presentation.
The optional
subtitles are in English Closed Caption, English SDH and Spanish.
The Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
First up is an engaging feature-length audio
commentary track with director/star Robert Redford.
While he comes across as smug and preachy in character, he’s
more down-to-earth and informative playing himself on this track.
Among some of his more interesting observations: how the up-and-coming
Republican senator played by Tom Cruise was written for an older
actor, but Redford was intrigued that Cruise wanted to take a risk on
the role; how his own character was informed by the experience of
having been in the Vietnam War; and how he relished nurturing the
fresh talent of actor Andrew Garfield, who played apathetic college
student Todd Hayes. Never one to shy away from controversy, Redford
also makes a point of stressing he never intended to make a
“lefty” film and he addresses some of the initial backlash
against the project which began even before they finished filming. But
in his mind, he maintains it is a balanced and objective presentation
of events and he leaves the audience to bring their own opinions to
the work.
The first featurette titled
The Making of Lions for Lambs (20:49) is the best and most
comprehensive of the bunch, offering interviews with the key cast
members and crew – the bulk of which is dominated by
director/star Redford. It does provide some interesting insight into
why Redford – who hasn’t directed a film since
2000’s The Legend of Bagger Vance – decided to
take on this particular project. Writer Matthew Michael Carnahan, who
also wrote 2007’s superior The Kingdom, gives some
credible observations about the apathy toward the ongoing “War
on Terror” which inspired him to write the script. But Redford,
like the patronizing professor he plays in the film, comes off a bit
too smug and preachy about his good intentions in ultimately making a
“message film” that pretty much went unnoticed …
even despite the presence of marquee names like himself, Streep and
Cruise.
The next featurette titled
Script to Screen (8:24) is more an abbreviated, EPK version of
the previous featurette which cuts out a lot of the behind-the-scenes
and on-the-set footage and focuses mostly on individual interviews
with Redford, Streep and Cruise (sporting a really odd-looking
haircut, presumably for his role in Valkyrie). There is a bit
more in-depth discussion of how the troops in Iraq were portrayed and
how Carnahan based some of the plot on stories he gleaned from
watching CNN.
Something titled UA Legacy (6:56) is
an interesting historical overview of all the United Artists films
that have made their mark on film history since UA’s inception,
many of which have received Oscars for Best Film and all of which are
now available on DVD.
The disc also includes both the
original theatrical and teaser trailers for Lions
for Lambs along with an introductory two-minute sneak
peak at Valkyrie, the new Bryan Singer movie
starring Tom Cruise, along with trailers for
Pathology, Death at a Funeral, Feast of Love, The Darjeeling
Limited and a Fox TV series promo titled FX: There is No
Box.The 92-minute film is organized into twenty-eight
chapters.
Exclusive DVD-ROM Features: What Happens
When You Pop The Disc Into Your PC?There are no
DVD-ROM Features on this disc.
Final ThoughtsWell-meaning but far too
didactic, Lions for Lambs is a big missed opportunity for
some heavy Hollywood hitters to make a viable statement on
American’s current involvement overseas. It may be that like
other recent Iraq-inspired films, Lions for Lambs is too
contemporary with the events it covers to have a valid impact. After
all, it was nearly a decade before some of the greatest films about
the Vietnam War made their mark. Though it offers a nice audio
presentation, the lackluster collection of bonus materials and clearly
inferior video presentation (at least on the screener I watched)
warrants only a marginal rental recommendation.