The Streets of San Francisco offers textbook
television detective fare that is both rewarding and sometimes
redundant. This long-running detective drama, about two detectives on
the beat in the city by the bay doing everything in their plaid-panted
power to put bad guys behind bars, is effortlessly engaging
television. But while it’s obvious the show has had a
penetrating influence on modern hour-long boob tube programming,
it’s an easier show to appreciate than it is to
actually like.
I recently finished my review of
The Untouchables: Season One, Volume Two, and in addition to
complaining about television seasons being split into two volumes (I
really hate that), I mentioned that its second installment made good
on the uneven promises its first round made. The second half of
The Untouchables was way better than the first, showcasing a
series truly hitting its narrative stride. But The Streets of San
Francisco is a different kind of show than The
Untouchables, one is an action-packed crime thriller while the
other is far more of a mystery series. And this first season’s
second half simply continues doing the same old thing as its older
brother.
For those who were able to avoid the show,
here’s a quick synopsis. The Streets of San Francisco
follows Lieutenant Mike Stone (Karl Malden), a hardened, by-the-
book fellow who after twenty years of police work was assigned to the
homicide detail of the SFPD with an upshot young detective named Steve
Keller (Michael Douglas). They solve crimes, they spar with one
another, and they make good TV. Because, seriously, with talents like
Malden and Douglas, it’s effortless to get sucked into the world
of The Streets of San Francisco.
However, as
engaging as these episodes might be – Lord knows that if you
start one, you’re definitely going to have to finish it –
The Streets of San Francisco exhausts its shtick very
quickly. I truly enjoy the camaraderie (but more importantly, the
friction) between Malden and Douglas; they make for an exceptional
Mutt-and-Jeff detective team. But as savvy as the plot points can be,
I found everything to be exceptionally repetitive. Yeah, the show took
on some pretty sticky topics for its time – illegal immigration,
heroin addiction, etc. – but even with the PG-13 subject matter,
the show defaults to a standard storytelling style.
Yet,
perhaps this is an unfair judgment. Maybe because so many crime series
since this one have copied the show’s rubric of the whodunit
style, my disdain for the series’ presentation lies more in the
fact that subsequent TV shows (L.A. Law, The Practice, etc.)
have beaten that dead horse far too often than to find this revisit to
the source intriguing. For example, my good buddy Troy says quite
earnestly that it’s tough for him to watch TV sitcoms with laugh
tracks. With the advent of The Office and 30 Rock
– shows whose styles exist far outside the realm of canned
audience participation – even Friends and his beloved
Seinfeld seem more like antiquated placeholders of TV past
than currently important shows.
So maybe the reason I had
trouble getting through all the episodes on this Season One,
Volume 2 set of Streets of San Francisco is that
I’ve seen murder mysteries done with more provocative narrative,
and the return to standard, by-the-book episodes like these feel
distinctly second-rate. I don’t know.
This writer
loves television, and even the humdrum sensibilities of a dinosaur
like The Streets of San Francisco won’t prevent me from
plowing through four DVDs’ worth of episodes. I can’t help
myself; I love a good mystery. But with the exception of a
surprisingly dirty episode involving an assassin and an overly-
trusting teacher (A Room With a View), I found most of these
episodes to be only momentarily engaging and ultimately immediately
forgettable.
So I’ll leave you with this. Is it a
well-made show? In some ways, yes. Is it worth owning on DVD so one
can go back and revisit the intricately nuanced drama and intrigue at
the show’s center? Probably not.
The Video:
How Does The Disc Look?
These full frame transfers
are identical in quality (and imperfection) to their Volume One
older brothers. Presented in the show’s original 1.33:1
aspect ratio, The Streets of San Francisco definitely shows
its age. Color accuracy is only so-so and there’s quite a bit of
grain, but black levels are relatively consistent and, for a 35-year-
old TV show, the transfer prints are clean and free of dirt and grime.
They’re not reference-quality, but fans of the series will be
satisfied.
The Audio: How Does The Disc Sound?
Ditto with the mono sound tracks on these episodes.
They’re subdued and rather bland. But that’s how the show
was originally recorded so no fault lies with this DVD set. Dialogue
sounds fine, although music cues sound tinny and compressed and sound
effects are boomy and brittle. Anyone familiar with the show should
come to this set with appropriate expectations.
Included
are Spanish subtitles and English Closed Captions.
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
None.
Exclusive DVD-ROM Features: What happens
when you pop the disc into your PC?
There are no
DVD-ROM features on this DVD.
Final Thoughts
I still think Paramount should be releasing full-
season sets of their classic television shows; I can’t seem to
get past that. But The Streets of San Francisco: Season One,
Volume Two is a slapdash affair. The series has occasional merit
– that much is true – but as involving as the show’s
murder mysteries can get, after you sit through an episode or two,
you’ve seen them all. Fans of the series will be disappointed at
the lack of bonuses, but audio and video qualities aren’t half
bad. I say rent a disc from the set first and see if you like it. If
you find The Streets of San Francisco to be an exceptional
series, than by all means grab this second volume. If not, save your
pennies.