I was intrigued when I discovered that A Scanner
Darkly was to be released, another film based on the mind-bending
work of Philip K. Dick (previous films included Minority
Report, Total Recall, Blade Runner). But
what I found impressed me as less Philip K. Dick and more as Hunter S.
Thompson. It was an indication of my ignorance. The
supplements would put me straight.This is a tale rooted in
the science fiction concepts of what might be possible in the not too
distant future. There are scramble suits that change the voice
and continuously change the appearance of the wearer to hide
identity. Surveillance technology has been refined to a
remarkable degree, allowing the authorities to observe and listen and,
if need be, record the daily activities of any citizen. Among
the population, a full twenty percent are addicted. The drug
that poses the greatest threat is substance-D. The exposition
explains that there are only two kinds of people: those that have not
tried it and addicts. The drug induces a break from reality,
causing delusions, hallucinations, and paranoia.
The
film has a stellar cast and a look that couldn’t be more
appropriate to its underlying themes. Those familiar with
director Linklater's Rotoscoped Waking Life will recognize
the animation technique.
Bob Arctor (Keanu Reeves) is a
narcotics officer deep undercover. To maintain his cover, he had
to take substance-D and is now quite addicted. As he discusses
his performance with his superior, Hank, he claims to be working his
way up the food chain to a kingpin responsible for much of the
distribution. In fact, he seems to have devolved into just
another addict who hangs around with his brain-addled friends: James
Barris (Robert Downey Jr.); Ernie Luckman (Woody Harrelson); and Donna
(Winona Ryder). Barris’ friend Charles Freck (Rory
Cochrane) also makes an appearance from time to time. And in
fact, he opens the movie.
We’re thrust within
Freck’s delusions, that he’s overrun with bizarre insects
that seem to inhabit his hair. No amount of washing can purge
his scalp of the hoard of bugs. It’s a disorienting
beginning to a disorienting film. The plot is minimal, and we
don’t fully understand why Arctor is being put through drug-
induced mental tortures until the end of the third act. But long
before we reach the object of the movie, we’re subjected to
interminable, incoherent ramblings and utterly peculiar exchanges and
fights among the principal characters. Luckman is especially
volatile. Barris is more under control, but even odder in his
mannerisms and speech. Donna is no less strange, craving
affection but without physical intimacy.
Despite the
technology, the police seem helpless to combat the growing problem of
substance-D. Only an organization called New Path holds out the
hope of rehabilitating the addicted and society. The film has a
few delicious twists that are, alas, seen coming from some
distance. As the closing credits rolled, I was left with very
mixed feelings. I found the immersion into the drug soaked
behaviors dramatically effective but annoying. The
irrationalities of the characters, their playing out of involuntary
behaviors, the utter futility of their addictions, all tended to wear
me down. I knew I was watching a skillfully constructed
entertainment, but I was not entertained.
The
Video: How Does The Disc Look?
The film’s
1.85:1 theatrical aspect ratio has been expanded to fill the entire
1.78:1 anamorphic frame. I am impressed by the cleanliness of
the transfer, with virtually no mosquito noise or halos to mar the
images. As you would expect for a Rotoscoped film, small object
detail and finely grained textures are limited by the animation, but
what is present is represented well. Perhaps the lack of extreme
detail and textures allowed lower compression and yielded a transfer
with fewer MPEG-2 artifacts. Video dynamic range is fine.
Shadow detail, such as it is, is also fine. Colors are nicely
saturated and exhibit no chroma noise. The visuals are
surrealistic, imparting a suggestion of the delusional and
hallucinogenic state of the substance-D abusers; I think the DVD
captures that effect very well.
The Audio: How Does
The Disc Sound?
The Dolby Digital 5.1 track is
front-centric. The surrounds are used more for atmospherics than
for discrete sounds and pans. The sound effects merely serve the
onscreen action. Exceptional bass is not present, nor is it
required for the plot. The all-important dialog is recorded
crisply and cleanly. The slightly off-kilter orchestral score by
Graham Reynolds seems to be no less disorienting; there are no themes
to be hummed. The score’s sound is fine, with a reasonable
soundstage.
The audio is supported by subtitles in English,
French, and Spanish. You’ll also find English Closed
Captions.
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
The disc opens with DVD trailers (3:23) for The
Wicker Man, Final Destination 3, The Promise,
and Rest Stop. They may be skipped.
We begin
with a feature-length commentary by writer/director
Richard Linklater, Keanu Reeves, producer Tommy Pallotta, author
Jonathan Lethem, and Philip K. Dick’s daughter, Isa Hackett
Dick. It’s here that I learned the most about the author
and his life. Much time is spent discussing the history of the
era in which the novel was written, the late ‘70s. The
issues of political intrigue, surveillance by the government, and the
rampant paranoia of the surveilled are covered at length. Too
much time is spent discussing the motivations of the actors, but at
least it’s frequently done in the context of differences between
the film and the novel. Paranoia and drug culture are
discussed. But the most interesting aspects for me were
Isa’s relating anecdotes and stories concerning her
father. I cannot avoid commenting that quite a bit of the
filmmakers’ comments are vague and rambling, disconnected and
metaphorical . . . I was somewhat reminded of the dialog in the
feature film.
The One Summer in Austin: The Story of
Filming A Scanner Darkly (26:23) featurette
makes the connection between the abuses of the Nixon
Whitehouse and the liberties taken by the current
administration. Dick is seen in a 1977 interview in which he
explains his growing paranoia caused by being targeted as a writer who
grew up in the Berkeley counterculture. That paranoia inspired
some of the concepts in A Scanner Darkly. His
attractive daughter, Isa Dick Hackett, offers her perspectives.
From there, we hear from the actors as they describe their impressions
of the script and the director. Things then start devolving into
the fluff that describes the nature of the characters and the
plot. Much of the content is saved with behind the scenes live
footage that was later Rotoscoped. And there are a few gems to
be found. For example, I had no idea that Winona Ryder’s
godfather was Timothy Leary and that her dad knew Dick. Nor was
I aware that Dick had his own addictions that may have shortened his
life; he died at the age of 54.
The Weight of the Line:
Animation Tales (20:45) featurette delves into
the animation techniques that give the film its unique look. For
example, the faces don’t have gradients; the color variations
are abrupt, like seen with severe video coring. The featurette
is less technical than I would have liked, but it does give us a look
at the work from the point of view of the artists. We first meet
the animators and they give us a rough idea of the computer-assisted
animation tools they used to Rotoscope the entire film. The
animation postproduction effort took eighteen months and exceeded the
budgeted 350 man-hours per minute of film. It was a huge
effort. Ample time was invested in determining rules to apply to
each character to satisfy the director and achieve consistency.
It’s an interesting short that gives due credit to the people
who made such a significant contribution.
The last extra is
the film’s theatrical trailer (1:59), presented
in anamorphic video.
Exclusive DVD-ROM Features:
What happens when you pop the disc into your PC?
None are included on this disc.
Final Thoughts
I’m not quite sure what to make of this
film. I was left with the impression that had the drug-addled
conversations been cut, the film would have been about a half hour
long. But I must credit the film for establishing a feel for the
effects of addiction, evoking an emotional response to mindless,
numbing dependence of brain decaying drugs. But is that
entertainment? Based on the supplements, I got the impression
that this is a faithful representation of the book, so at the very
least, fans of the work in that medium should find the movie of
interest.