Little horror genre competition, Sarah Michelle Gellar, and a very
aggressive marketing campaign helped an imperfect but clever script
and a relatively meager $10 million dollar production budget to
massive profits. Domestic opening weekend (on over 3200 screens) was
nearly $40 million followed by a strong $20 million second week. After
raking in over $110 million domestically, not including video sales,
those that haven't seen this film may still be asking themselves,
"should I?"
While Japan's original The
Grudge was a hit in Japan in 2003, it was re-filmed again in
Japan as English-speaking. It has a decent set up of an American
hospice student, Karen (Sarah Michelle Gellar), assigned to an elderly
woman named Emma (Grace Zibriskie) in a spooky house. The previous
hospice student from the day before never returned... The nice house
is ominous from the get-go, but Karen tries to fulfill her duties of
giving care to near-mute Emma. Strange noises and past images are
thrown at a terrorized though curious Karen. But leaving the house
certainly does not mean the bad energy will leave Karen. No, it's not
bad Karma, Karen; someone has a grudge. Beware that this film
really flips time around; the film is nonlinear. But go with it,
remember a phrase a character said, and trust that the unveiling story
will be more natural and interesting this way. Knowing this little bit
really helped me enjoy the film's smooth pace. For 91 minutes, writer
and director Takashi Shimizu certainly shows talent for his material,
helped by Jeff Betancourt's deft editing. Yes, some of the scares are
cliches, like someone searching a dark room when all of a sudden the
piercing "Reeoooowww!!" of a thrown kitty makes you jump out
of your seat. These are a cheap scares for sure and borrowed from
countless other cardboard horror films, like the beginning of
Friday the 13th Part 2. Still, there are more than a few
stabbing jolts that, with the help of the savvy score by Christopher
Young (Swordfish, The Core), gave me Goosebumps. All
of the actors were well cast and performed far better than in most
horror films, except for the sour gal that played William Mapother's
wife.
There are some minor spoilers and existentialism ahead,
and even though they don't give away as much as other reviews I've
read, to avoid them you can skip this paragraph and the next.
Supernatural issues in storytelling are fine as long as they have
decent plausibility and are integrated with some integrity (skeptics
roll your eyes; believers, you know what I mean). However, I just
never bought two of this film's ideas, even with my suspension of
disbelief in the stratosphere! The first is that after a victim leaves
the house, a spirit follows that person. Huh? It's a dreamy concept at
best. Virtually all the spiritual ghost events that I've read about -
and for which most investigators concur - specify that each distinct
haunting remains at a unique geographical location.
The second
was that I just didn't understand if the spiritual things were simply
energy or literal earthbound spirits. Since they seemed to have a will
of intent, I was inclined to think of earthbound spirits. I understand
that the haunting spirits' deaths were traumatic, which is certainly
the overwhelming basis for reported hauntings, but why are these
spirits so hateful? The ghostly past-victims were not portrayed as
hateful people except for the father, but he doesn't do any haunting
or killings! And I didn't understand the little boy with the black
kitty cat connection. Also, the villain's immediate capture of a
victim often appears too posed with lurching grimaces for the camera.
This was often unnatural and emotionally disconnected from the victim.
It's more of a form of posing rather than engagement. Then again, the
weakness of my objections is that supernatural beings are anything but
predictable. So what do I know?
Anyway, beyond the ghostly
high drama, creepy scenes, and questionable motivations, this film can
get a person thinking about fear and spirits. And maybe every now and
then that's a good thing. I didn't expect a spectacularly wild CGI
film given it's reported budget (and I was glad for that), but given
the film's hype, I was hoping it would be a bit better. Still, when
all is said and done, this is one of those films that makes for a
wonderfully spooky rental on a dark night.
The Video:
How Does The Disc Look?
"Mastered in High
Definition," this film is presented in its theatrical 1.85:1
widescreen ratio in anamorphic video. Last week I saw this film in a
still(!) near-capacity discount theater (Movies 12 in Springfield,
Oregon, for $1.50, if you want to know) and was surprised that the
print still looked quite good. The DVD faithfully presents the film
with its slightly muted tones of dusky blues and variations of grays.
The film never intended to be that vibrant except for rare occasions.
Resolution is quite nice on the DVD with pleasant detail of textures
and hues. Though the consistent gradient of the film grain during
outside sequences isn't as smooth as I expected. Occasionally,
discerning eyes will detect the faintest grain flutter, barely
noticeable, even during some still shots. While the 35mm film looked
great on the big screen, the one thing that DVD can often do better is
manage the black values. Contrast is very nicely balanced with
controlled and generally sharp whites, and deep blacks that reveal
some good shadow detail sometimes seemed richer than the theatrical
presentation.
Skin tones are well done in this mix. The
slightest edge halos around bridge structures were noticeable, but
indoor shots didn't display such anomalies. Compression issues were
never a problem. The worst part of the DVD was some blatant artifacts
of black nicks and scratches near the first 20 minutes or so. You will
notice them in the bottom-left corner of the screen (repeated!), and
its simply disappointing attribute for such a fresh film. The rest of
the film is well transferred, and looks very attractively composed in
it's aspect ratio, but the film was never a razor sharp, snappy
presentation to begin with. Aside from the artifact problem, this is a
very respectable transfer. Despite being "Mastered in High
Definition" (which can show a noticeable improvement in
film transfer to DVD), perhaps a cleaned up Superbit reissue would
warrant improvement and another look.
The Audio: How
Does The Disc Sound?
The audio is presented in 5.1
Dolby Digital. The theatrical presentation was terrific. The Movies 12
theater (with 12 screens) was built in 1989 or 1990; the particular
theater in which I saw this film was in one of the larger rooms and
utilized their best sound system. I got there late and didn't get the
best seats, sitting one-third away from the screen; still, the audible
dynamic range was exciting and comparable to the newest theaters.
Balanced fronts and swirling surround sounds were quite engaging. So
based on that experience, I expected a fun treat on the DVD in an even
more intimate atmosphere. Certainly more details are evident from this
DVD in a home theater, but overall there seems to be a lack of heft
that I expected. Granted this film was low budget and simply was a
surprise hit, but one would think... ah, well. Anyway, in the home
theater version, the dialogue is well centered up front with slight
pans for natural placement of the actors. Surrounds are discrete, with
a few effects that smoothly panned nicely. But for the most part, the
surrounds were simply exhibiting ambiance. What I really missed was a
punchy.1 LFE; the bass wasn't as deep or exciting as I'd hoped. Bass
is present and it's pleasant enough, but this isn't a pleasant movie,
so the mix could have kicked us in the gut on a few occasions. Alas,
deep bass content was the one element for which I forgot to make a
mental note during the theatrical experience. Nevertheless, while my
expectations were a tad higher than the DVD delivered, this is a solid
mix. I just wish it had been a little spicier.
A 5.1 French
Dolby Digital mix is included. English closed captions and subtitles
in French, English, and Spanish are included.
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
A
screen-specific audio commentary with Sam Raimi, Ted
Raimi, Sarah Michelle Gellar and a few other cast members is included.
This is a party with lots of jokes and some added trivia. But let's
face it; best commentaries do not include more than three people. And
the best is usually the director and editor. This entertains with
fascinating bits, but some viewers may feel that a more serious
approach to the filmmaking would have made it a better commentary.
Maybe a future commentary will simply include Sam Raimi and editor
Jeff Betancourt and/or screenwriter Stephen Susco to give the
commentary some meat.
A Powerful Rage: A Five-Part
"Making-of" Documentary (47:36) is included. It's
divided into: The Birth of the Grudge; The
Myth of Ju-On; Culture Shock: The American Cast in
Japan; Designing the Grudge House; and,
A new Direction: Understanding Takashi Shimizu. All
chapters are interesting and seem to work best with the convenient
"Play All" feature. Designing the Grudge House is
interesting because the house was literally done on Tokyo's largest
film sound stage shared by the older Godzilla flicks! The filmmakers
enjoyed that. Understanding Takashi Shimizu is enlightening, since the
movie seemed to be a satisfying project for him to re-film for an
English-speaking audience with American actors. He used his same film
crew. The American people were impressed with how efficient and tuned-
in the Asian crews were in setting up and breaking down shots,
processes for takes, and consistently polite behavior. Film school in
Japan anyone? All recount that the shoot was an exceptionally
enjoyable experience in their film careers. This is a great featurette
that fans and casual admirers of film will enjoy.
Next, we
have an interesting featurette called, "Under the
Skin" Featurette - A Medical Explanation of Fear Response in
Film (12:25). Professor and author Joseph LeDoux leads this
feature, and it's exactly what it purports. He has a particular
fascination with the brain's response to fear and that is his focus;
he relates that fear response to watching horror in films. An
interesting piece.
Last, we have a collection of eight film
trailers: The Grudge; The
Forgotton; Guess Who; Anacondas: The Hunt for the
Blood Orchid; Boogieman; Riding Giants;
Spider-Man 2; Man of the Horn; and,
MirrorMask.
Exclusive DVD-ROM Features: What
happens when you pop the disc into your PC?
There are
no DVD-ROM features on this DVD.
Final
Thoughts
This film has been compared to The
Ring based on horror tone level, though the stories are wildly
different. The Grudge remains interesting, though The
Ring was a little more curious. Remind yourself that this film
flips around the timing of events, so pay close attention and you
shouldn't get lost. However, I never quite "got" why the
ghosts (or energies?) were so perpetually hateful despite their tragic
death events. Plus, what gave them license to haunt people outside of
the house zone? Suspend that disbelief! A good transfer, solid sound
and worthwhile supplements make this a very good rental
recommendation, though the steep price should motivate fans to find it
on sale.