The success of digital video, and DVD in particular, has had an
interesting impact on how the studios release their back catalogs. If
a studio projects that a disc will garner sufficient sales, the studio
may choose to make a significant investment in restoring the film
elements. But as we're painfully aware, this was not always the case;
consider all the recycled D2 composite video laserdisc transfers that
have found their way to early DVDs. Some restorations are performed
predominantly in the computer, applying image-processing techniques to
solve otherwise irreconcilable problems with the film elements. In
August of 2000, we enjoyed a splendidly restored North By
Northwest thanks to such processing. (The modest resolution of DVD
- even anamorphic DVD - is very forgiving of these techniques; it'll
be interesting to see how this plays out when HD-DVD hits the
market.)
To restore a film to its full cinematic glory,
however, is a Herculean task, particularly when neglect has nearly
destroyed the elements. Lawrence of Arabia was such a film; the
gentleman responsible for its restoration is the eminent Robert A.
Harris. We cannot credit the market clout of DVD for that effort. It
was ten years before DVD was introduced that Mr. Harris teamed with
restoration producer Jim Painten and director David Lean to restore
the film elements and replace deleted footage. (Many have credited
James Katz, Mr. Harris's longtime restoration partner, with
participating in Lawrence, but the record indicates that this
partnership was formed after Lawrence was restored.)
The film stands as a series of inspired cinematic visions that tend
to draw the viewer into the desert. It's a visceral experience. The
sandy vistas are as alien as one may find on Earth. I can recall my
first impression of a Middle Eastern desert, very different from my
experiences in the American Southwest; I was reminded of photographs
from a Mars lander. And the sand isn't granular like beach sand; it's
the consistency of compacted talcum powder. That's why hooves and wind
create so much dust. By traveling to Jordan for most of his location
shooting, Lean managed to capture that inhospitable beauty on
film.
Consider the sequence in which Omar Sharif's character,
Sherif Ali, chieftain of the Harith tribe, is introduced. Lawrence and
his Bedouin guide are standing at a desert well. The horizon dances
with shimmering heat as it rises off the hot sand. The heat reduces
the critical angle, causing the sky to be reflected below the horizon,
an effect well known as a mirage. Suspended in the hot turbulent air,
a tiny dark distortion forms within the ripples of heat, slowly to
become a distant man riding his camel toward us, seemingly in midair.
As he draws closer, his mount's hooves return to the Earth; Ali has
come to find who has violated his well. Much subtle detail had been
lost in previous low-resolution video transfers, but this lovingly
produced DVD with its admirable restoration captures the emotional
impact Lean intended. 
A plot summary does not do justice to
this film, but is included here in the unlikely event that you aren't
familiar with the story. (For most of you, you might want to skip
ahead to the video section.) It is 1917. The First World War rages in
the trenches of Europe. Germany's Turkish ally is waging a campaign in
the Mideast. The Turks have occupied Arabia and are threatening the
Suez. Lieutenant Lawrence (Peter O'Toole) is sent into the field at
the insistence of British diplomat and head of the Arab Bureau, Mr.
Dryden (Claude Rains). Under orders to assess the situation, Lawrence
seeks out a powerful tribal leader, Prince Feisal (Alec Guinness). The
Arab revolt against the Turks is not going well. Feisal and his men
are withdrawing to escape Turkish aircraft sent to bomb and
strafe.
A key port, Aqaba, must be taken to supply the Arabs.
Lawrence devises a dangerous plan: cross the Nafud Desert and attack
from the rear. The Turks' artillery pieces are intended to defend
against a sea attack and cannot be turned inland. Ali believes
Lawrence is quite mad, but Lawrence prevails; the impossible is always
possible. Feisal lends his support, Ali is shamed into joining him,
and a band of warriors sets off to make a trek no sane man would try.
Whether through luck or willpower they survive crossing the scorching
wasteland, only to find that one of their company had fallen from his
mount and was left behind. Lawrence decides to return for the fallen
man as Ali berates Lawrence for risking the mission for one man. When
Lawrence returns safely with the missing warrior, he wins the respect
of the tribe. This is a pivotal point. Lawrence is now convinced of
his invulnerability and he's earned the acceptance and the loyalty of
the people from whom he must ask such a great deal.
Lawrence
meets Auda abu Tayi (Anthony Quinn), chieftain of the Howeitat tribe,
as he frolics alone in a gift of white robes. He wins over this
cynical Bedouin as well. Applying his canny understanding of Bedouin
values and customs, Lawrence manages to unite the Harith and the
Howeitat, antagonistic rivals, in a common cause. They ride together
to Aqaba and take the fortress from the Turks. Their success further
emboldens Lawrence. With the support of his government, he guides the
Bedouin tribes in guerilla warfare, disrupting Turkish lines of
communication and rail. With each victory, his sense of
indestructibility grows. After derailing a Turkish train, a surviving
soldier repeatedly shoots at Lawrence with a pistol from perhaps a
dozen yards away. Lawrence stands passively until a Bedouin ally slays
the soldier with a sword. This confidence will be his undoing.
Accomplishing the impossible is one of Lawrence's most effective
tools for ensuring the loyalty of the men who follow him (that and an
ample supply of British gold). When a bold incursion into a Turkish
held outpost leads to his capture and torture, he undergoes an
unfortunate transformation. Lawrence started this campaign with an
instinctive distaste for violence and killing, yet an incident in
which he was forced to kill provoked an unexpected and unwelcome
response: he enjoyed it. He found this very troubling, but his
introspection was abandoned when the Turks brutalized him. He emerges
from that brief captivity cursed with fear and hatred, feelings that
do not dissipate until he takes a terrible revenge on the Turks.
Lawrence becomes revered. His exploits are exploited by American
reporter Jackson Bentley (Arthur Kennedy), a Lowell Thomas surrogate.
Lawrence will come out of this campaign as a colonel, and despite his
love/hate relationship with the desert, returns to England and an
ironic fate. 
Lean's choice to portray Lawrence was at once
canny and serendipitous. Lawrence is a cornucopia of contradictions,
elements of sadomasochism, egocentricity, and sexual ambiguity. Peter
O'Toole manages to capture Lawrence's eccentricities as he discovers
his affinity for the desert and its people. He projects Lawrence's
turmoil though his impossibly blue eyes. We readily accept his
psychological arc as his ego grows to messianic proportions with
tragic consequences. The intelligent script by Robert Bolt and Michael
Wilson is based on Lawrence's wartime writings. The desert provided an
unworldly beauty. David Lean brought his vision.
Video: How
Does The Disc Look?
The film's theatrical aspect ratio of
2.20:1 is presented in anamorphic video that had been down-converted
from a high definition transfer. When Columbia Tristar originally
released Lawrence of Arabia to DVD - the fifth highest ranked
film on the AFI top 100 and arguably director David Lean's best work -
the studio inexplicably excluded Robert Harris from the transfer
process. That oversight was corrected as the Superbit re-release was
being prepared, and Mr. Harris has stated elsewhere that this new DVD
is as close in appearance to the restored film as is possible. Thanks
to his participation and the extended bit rate that forced this 227-
minute film to be spread across two discs, the results are very
impressive indeed. I found watching this new DVD a revelation; it's
like someone had cleaned red-tinted Vaseline from my projector's
lenses. 
But there's good news and bad news. To demonstrate
each, I captured the same frame (located at 18:48) from both the
original and the Superbit release, cropped them, and magnified them to
ensure visibility. As I was viewing the Superbit version, the first
thing that struck me was the improved level of detail as compared to
the previous release. Fine textures and small object detail suppressed
in the first release are superb on the Superbit release.
In my first comparison, the two images are from the
lower right corner of the frame. Notice that the ripples in the sand
caused by blowing wind are clearly visible on the Superbit release and
virtually invisible on the original. This is indicative to the
improved level of detail. The differences in chrominance and luminance
may be attributed to Mr. Harris and the fine-tuning of color and
density. 
The second comparison was pulled from that same frame,
this time from the upper left at the transition between the desert
sand and the bright blue sky. Notice that the excessive red on the
original DVD imparts a slight purple hue to the blue sky, which is
more properly shown on the Superbit release. This is indicative of the
improved color balance throughout this new disc. But these two images
also highlight the unfortunate reality that edge halos are a bit more
prominent on the Superbit DVD. Mr. Harris mentioned that two layers of
edge enhancement found on the original DVD were removed from the video
for this Superbit release. I'm left to speculate what may have
remained. One potential source may be the MPEG-2 encoder applied to
the video for Columbia Tristar DVDs; it more often than not causes
halos as a compression artifact. The other possibility is that the
halos are a byproduct of telecine and the greater level of detail that
Superbit's higher bit rates provide makes them more pronounced. Mr.
Harris mentioned that the monitor used for quality assessment was 32-
inches. In my humble opinion, that's not good enough. I continue to
hope that soon the practice will be put in place to view progress on a
large screen illuminated by a superior CRT-based projector as the
video is processed for DVD.
Having pointed out a worst-case
flaw, I will now seem to contradict myself by stating that the halos
rarely intrude and that this Superbit release is so much more
satisfying than the original that selecting one over the other is a
no-brainer. The remaster is clearly superior. Highly saturated colors
are vivid and noise-free. Skin tones are consistently more natural
than the original. Contrast and brightness are excellent. The day for
night scenes have much improved shadow detail. And digital artifacts
are not in evidence. You may notice the occasional splice in the form
a subtle, slight, single jerk of moving objects, but I think it's safe
to assume that these were the unavoidable artifacts of trying to
reassemble the film from available elements.
There is one
other issue that I must address. Lawrence is a very long film,
about 227 minutes. An intermission was built into the theatrical
presentation at about nineteen minutes beyond the two-hour mark
presumably for bladder breaks and to provide theater owners a second
shot at selling some expensive popcorn. To maximize the quality of the
presentation on this Superbit release, Columbia Tristar decided to
split the film at 1:56:45, approximately twenty-three minutes before
the theatrical intermission. So as disc one runs out of data, the
viewer experiences a jump cut to a white on black placard with
instructions to insert the second disc. The cut is abrupt and
arbitrary. I'm more than enthusiastic about video quality - I do,
after all, watch my DVDs on an eight-foot wide screen illuminated by a
fine CRT projector - but I found this well-meaning decision
esthetically troubling.
I can certainly understand that
increasing the length of the content on the first disc by twenty-three
minutes, about 20%, would have a proportional and significant impact
on the bit rate, but I can't help but wonder how much the quality of
the first disc's video would have suffered. An alternative and perhaps
a more controversial solution might have been to edit the location of
the intermission by placing it at 1:54:34. It's at that point that
Sherif Ali and Auda abu Tayi watch Lawrence's receding back as he
gallops off to Cairo to report the capture of Aqaba. It would not have
reproduced the theatrical experience accurately, but in the context of
having to switch discs, might have been more satisfying. (From my
point of view, the arbitrary disc break is just as heretical as moving
the location of the intermission.)
My reservations aside, this
is a dramatic improvement. We may now have a transfer that truly does
justice to the poetic visuals Lean brought to the screen. I can only
imagine how much better it will look on HD-DVD.
Audio: How
Does the Disc Sound?
Two 5.1 tracks are provided, one in
DTS and the other in Dolby Digital. As I mentioned in my original
review, the audio restoration wasn't quite as successful. Maurice
Jarre's excellent score lacks breadth and resolution. Despite improved
equalization, the intermodulation distortion inherent in recordings of
the period simply cannot be processed away. There is an unavoidable
harshness that runs through all of the audio, sound effects and dialog
alike.
Surround effects are modestly applied and sound to be
monaural. So those of you who have EX decoding should disable it to
avoid a sonic collapse into the center surround. While the rumble of
thousands of hooves is very effective, an exceptional subwoofer won't
be required to reproduce them. Deepest bass and shimmering highs are
both absent. But considering the reported condition of the film before
the restoration was begun, this is actually a superb effort.
Intelligibility is maintained throughout, and the visuals are so
stunning that any audible disappointments are easily overlooked. As in
the original release, the roadshow feature of an overture in complete
darkness before each part of the film also has been restored.
The inevitable comparison between Dolby Digital and DTS yields a
surprise. The modest distortion in the film's audio is such that it
masks the subtle differences between the two lossy digital audio
formats. But from what I heard, I have to speculate that the two
tracks were equalized very differently. The Dolby Digital track
emphasizes the upper bass, imparting a bloated sound to the score. The
DTS track is more realistically contoured; without sacrificing the
lowest registers, the orchestral spectral balance is more natural and
more satisfying. To my ears, on this DVD, DTS is the preferred
track.
The audio is supported by subtitles in English, Spanish,
French, Portuguese, Chinese, Korean, and Thai. In addition, English
Closed Captions are included.
Supplements: What Goodies Are
There?
There are no supplements to consume bits on this
Superbit DVD.
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do you get when you
pop the disc in your PC?
Also dropped from the previous
release are all the ROM features.
Parting Thoughts
Thanks to Columbia Tristar's ultimate realization that Mr. Harris'
participation was vital to the appearance of Lawrence, we now
have a truly outstanding DVD of an exceptional film. This Superbit
release is highly recommended.