I enjoy films that have a political or social agenda when they're
well camouflaged as involving entertainment. My favorite such movie is
The Insider; it took the tobacco industry to task for placing
its own interests - marketing the world's single most dangerous and
addictive legal product - over the welfare of the populace. While
tobacco kills tens of thousands each year, the execution by the state
of a single innocent is equally egregious, and capital punishment has
become a hot topic. So flawed was the application of capital
punishment in the state of Illinois that the governor halted all
executions. The United States may be the last remaining developed
country where capital punishment is still applied, so it was with some
interest that I spun the DVD for a film that was reported to be in
staunch opposition to the death penalty, The Life of David
Gale.
The film stars several fine actors. Kevin Spacey is
ex-Professor David Gale. He's in Texas' death row, awaiting execution
for the rape and murder of his best friend, Constance Harraway (Laura
Linney). After nine years of failed appeals and less than a week
before Gale's scheduled lethal injection, he instructs his lawyer,
Braxton Belyeu (Leon Rippy), to contact a news magazine to sell for a
half million dollars the rights to Gale's exclusive interview. Gale
stipulates that he's to be interviewed alone by award winning
journalist Bitsy Bloom (Kate Winslet). Her instinct is that the
man is guilty, but the offer arrives only five days before his
execution date - they'll have only three two-hour sessions during
three consecutive days - and she's intrigued. Her pre-interview
research does not prepare her for what she finds. The circumstances
that led Gale to the death house are told in flashbacks as he relates
his history to her during three afternoons.
He was highly
regarded professor of philosophy at a large Austin university. And he
was an avid death-penalty abolitionist, as was his friend, Constance.
But his wife was having an extended affair with another man and this
may have led Gale to drink too much. Drunk at a party, he allowed
himself to be seduced by a bitter student, recently expelled. The next
day, she falsely accused him of rape, then left the state without
pursuing the charge. The stigma of the unresolved accusation took a
heavy toll. He lost his position at the university and became
unemployable. His wife sued for divorce and took his beloved young son
to Spain. He spiraled downward into alcohol and despair. When
Constance was found dead on the floor of her kitchen - nude,
handcuffed, and with a plastic bag covering her head and taped around
her neck - the police investigators discover one of Gale's
fingerprints on the bag. An autopsy revealed his semen within her and
the handcuff key in her stomach. He was convicted and sentenced to
death. 
As Bloom listens to his tale, she becomes more
sympathetic. Odd circumstances convince her that Gale may have been
framed. She's been followed by a faceless stranger in a pickup.
Someone had broken into her motel room to leave a videotape of
Constance suffocating on the floor. Bloom pursues the truth in the
hope of saving an innocent man, but Gale has no illusions. As the
third and last interview ends he explains that he doesn't expect her
to save his life, he expects her to save his good name for the sake of
his son.
I have revealed little here; most of what I've
described may be gleaned from the theatrical trailer. This film may
have a political message, but it is foremost a murder mystery. Is the
mysterious stranger the true killer? Is there a conspiracy? After
years of appeals, why did Gale wait until the last minute to seek the
help? And why a writer? The answers are logical and consistent within
the premise of the film. Unfortunately, as compelling as the storyline
may be, the film ultimately fails. The film opens with Bloom's rental
car overheating at what we will learn somewhat later to be a critical
time. This may add a note of high drama, but we're expected to believe
that this bright reporter wasn't clever enough to have exchanged her
rental during the previous four days of ample time and dashboard
warnings. But more seriously is the failure of logic within the
underlying story, not revealed until the end of the last act of the
film. Much earlier, during a televised debate over capital punishment
between the governor of Texas and Gale, the abolitionist was unable to
respond to a critical question. As the film draws to an end, we
discover that the answer has been provided. But that answer is
corrupt, and does harm to the abolitionist movement rather than
bolster its cause.
Video: How Does The Disc Look?
The film's theatrical aspect ratio of 2.35:1 is presented in
anamorphic video. Call me superstitious if you will, but I knew that
if I continued to write about what appeared to be a welcome trend in
the banishment of edge halos, they would return with a vengeance. And
indeed they have. For all high contrast video transitions, this
Universal release suffers from halos of low amplitude (the contrast of
the halo is low) and low bandwidth (the halos have significant width).
This imparts a general messy appearance to the images. To make things
a tad worse, the images are consistently soft. Fine textures and small
object detail are suppressed. On the plus side, color accuracy based
on flesh tones is fine. I noticed no chroma noise or smearing.
Mosquito noise and blocking seem to be absent. And shadow detail is
quite good. But the overall impression is simply mediocre.

Audio: How Does The Disc Sound?
The Dolby Digital 5.1
track is dominated overwhelmingly by the front channels; the surround
channels were audible only on rare occasions. Neither exceptionally
deep bass nor shimmering highs are apparent. The eclectic score
written by the director's sons, Alex and Jake Parker, is a
disconcerting mix of orchestral, rock, spiritual, and classical; it
sounds slightly compressed and lacks transparency. Sound effects serve
the onscreen activities and did not draw attention to themselves. The
dialog, the most important element in this show, remains crystal clear
throughout, without a hint of lossy compression raspiness.
The
alternative languages are in French and Spanish, also presented in
Dolby Digital 5.1. The subtitles are in French, Spanish, and
English. 
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
Universal has been generous with the extras for this DVD. First is
a director's commentary by Alan Parker. He talks with great
fondness and respect for his players and touches upon their being
brought into the show. He also mentions how he came to be involved.
The politics of the death penalty play into this monolog, but for the
most part, he concentrates on the process of filming. We learn that
Linney's participation was during the first half of the shooting
schedule and Winslet's was during the second; this required Winslet to
be able to react emotionally to events that she could only imagine,
since she hadn't participated in their filming. We learn about
locations and something of the Texas penal system. This is an above
average commentary, devoid of plot narration and avoiding the obvious.
There are several short featurettes; one relates to the issue
and the rest to the film. The dominant point made in Death In
Texas (9:09) is that there are more executions in that state than
any other. Since there is a fair correlation between a state's general
population and the population of its death row (California leads the
nation in both populations, followed by Texas, which is second in both
populations), I find this argument less than compelling. A better
argument and a clearer overview of the issues may be found in a DVD-
ROM text feature. 
The Making of The Life of David
Gale (16:56) and The Music of The Life of David
Gale (4:50) are casual glimpses behind the scenes. In the
first, we learn about casting and the history of the screenplay.
Better than fluff, it's a sincere effort to impart a little background
information without duplicating the director's commentary. The second
piece is a bit of nepotism. The director decided to hire his sons to
score the film and this little featurette describes the relationships
and musical goals.
There are several deleted scenes
that may be played individually or sequentially, with or without
director's commentary. None contribute anything of particular interest
to the story, and are best off omitted from the theatrical cut. Next
is the simple Poster Concepts, a page that allows you to select
from one of three posters for a closer look. The film's theatrical
trailer (2:32) is shown in non-anamorphic widescreen. The Life
of David Gale Soundtrack (0:33) is a promo for the film's CD.
Cast and Crew offers professional biographies and filmographies
for seven of the players and six of the filmmakers (including the
director's sons - they are very well represented on this DVD).
Finally, Recommendations offers five DVD covers for films that
Universal thinks you might enjoy.
The 131-minute feature is
organized into twenty chapters
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do
you get when you pop the disc in your PC?
After the Inter
actual player loads the Universal skin, you'll have a couple of
choices. The first is a thoughtful essay by director
Alan Parker on capital punishment; it's called “The Death Penalty: The
Political Argument.” It's evenhanded, offering references to web sites
that are for and against the death penalty. He examines the religious
and social pressures for the penalty, and makes apt comparisons
between the United States, Europe, and several totalitarian
governments. Some legal arguments are also examined. It's a pity that
his message, so clearly stated here, was lost in the labyrinth of
viewer manipulation in his film. The second choice is to click on the
Universal logo; this takes you to the Universal Pictures website,
featuring the latest theatrical releases and DVDs, and links to other
Universal ventures, like the theme parks and television.
Parting Thoughts
I admired the performances of the
principle players, the ingenuity of the writer, and the effective
direction. Alas, it was not enough. The revelations were telegraphed
and the ultimate resolution did a considerable disservice to the
issue. On the level of a murder mystery, the film works. As a
political statement, it leaves much to be desired. The transfer is a
regression, the audio is passable, and the supplements are somewhat
thorough. Take heed before you buy or rent.