It was supposed to be an old-fashioned Hollywood duel of the
fates, a battle between two contemporary cinema institutions: Martin
Scorsese and Steven Spielberg have both been called "America's
greatest filmmakers" by the mainstream media, and this past holiday
season each had prestige pictures starring Leonardo DiCaprio that were
set to open on Christmas Day. Spielberg's Catch Me If You Can had star
power to burn - DiCaprio, Hanks, Walken - but Steve's track record
over the last couple of years has been surprisingly spotty. So as the
bets continued to be placed, it was soon Scorsese who was the front-
runner in the clash of the filmmaking titans - his three-hour Gangs of
New York a labor of love that he hadd spent twenty years trying to get
made, boasting epic sets, tons of buzz and over $100 million spent by
the Daddy Warbucks at Miramax.
So, how did the race turn out?
Spielberg and DreamWorks held tight to the Christmas release date,
bumping Gangs to early December, and Scorsese's return to the hallowed
ground of Fellini ended up on just about every critic's top ten list
at year's end. Yet Spielberg's heist creampuff ran off with over $150
million, while Gangs was left with a "mere" $80 million. Box
office battles aside, this extensive new two-disc set proves that
Scorsese's ambitious epic suffers more than a little from an acute
case of the emperor's new clothes. Sure, Catch Me If You Can was
easily dismissed because of its cotton-candy lightness and
effervescent, flighty spirit, but Gangs of New York is all buildup and
no delivery. All the elements of a solid, neoclassical epic are here -
a great cast, tremendous set design and art direction, and, of course,
Scorsese - but Gangs rings as a hollow film, one that is easy to
appreciate for its gory, triumphant, decidedly "American" baroque
spirit, but hard to really like. Believe me, Daniel Day-Lewis
is not the main problem with the film as some have claimed. His Bill
the Butcher is a demonic, mesmerizing character, and Day-Lewis is able
to bring an eerie urgency and lackadaisical colloquialism to Bill's
manipulative attacks. He's a decisive villain, yes, but he is also the
character that it is the easiest to connect with. Hands-down the
meanest motherfucker around, Day-Lewis is still able to bring a
subtlety and nuance to his portrayal, which makes it all the easier to
fear him. It's a staggering performance.
Rather, it is the
rest of the cast who just aren't up to task. Leo is overly grumpy and
monotonous, and his Amsterdam native never gets a chance to do
anything but tread water. As the protagonist of this vast, sprawling
epic, the fact that he is instantly usurped whenever Daniel Day-Lewis
wanders into the frame doesn't say much for his presence here. And
poor Cameron Diaz: Even if the other two Charlie's Angels swooped in
at the climax with legs kicking kung-fu style, there is a sad reality
that we all have to face - her accent just doesn't work. Worse, her
character literally feels tacked-on. Yes, it's nice to watch DiCaprio
make out with one of the more eligible bachelorettes in the world of
cinema, but Diaz's entire place in the narrative framework of this
film is wholly unnecessary, and as the film hobbles to a close, her
presence is reduced to being cliched and blase. It's a misguided role
both in conception and execution. 
Much has been made of the
sheer visual bravura of Gangs of New York and it is certainly a wonder
to behold. but as a film it is simply a mishmash of good ideas and
intentions. Scorsese goes for the jugular, yet my biggest complaint
would be that it still doesn't feel like a Scorsese picture. It's not
just that it's a period piece, as Marty was able to bring an
extraordinary sense of joi di vivre to The Age of Innocence that was
simply breathtaking. Rather nothing here has drive, nothing seems to
gel. The end result is a picture that contains some amazing moments,
but fails to match its scale and ambition. And it is indeed a very
admirable failure, but one that even those who liked it would have to
agree just doesn't quite cut it.
Video: How Does The Disc
Look?
A two-disc set, this sprawling 167-minute epic gets
spliced in half and split across two platters, with the second disc
actually boasting a longer runtime. The 2.35:1 anamorphic widescreen
transfer here is striking, even if it isn't quite as good as it should
be. Most surprising is that the source material is not in pristine
shape. I noticed quite a bit of dirt and grime on the print in a
number of instances. Otherwise, this is a very good transfer in almost
all other respects. Colors are marvelous, with an eye-popping richness
and very clean reproduction. Blacks and contrast are excellent,
resulting in often extraordinary detail - shadow delineation is well
above average and the transfer often has a very three-dimensional
appearance. Given the high bitrate, compression artifacts aren't a
problem and I noticed no real edge enhancement. Some may find the
intermission annoying and pretentious, but aside from the spotty print
this is a very nice transfer.
Audio: How Does The Disc
Sound? 
The transfer may have a few problems, but the Dolby
Digital 5.1 Surround mix is top-of-the-line. Frequency response is
hefty, broad and boomy, offering ample opportunities for sheer sonic
bombast and envelopment. Separation across all channels is very
engaging which makes for an astoundingly rich three-dimensional
experience, and the .1 FLE track given quite a workout, making this
one a real low-end wonder. Howard Shore's score (and even U2's humdrum
single, "The Hands That Built America") sound great, perfectly
balanced in the mix and with plenty of surround activity.
But
wait, the included DTS 5.1 track one-ups this already-great Dolby mix,
offering a more finely detailed, better directed mix. Minute details
are more noticeable and enhanced in the surrounds, plus bass is
crisper and imaging even more transparent. The DTS is even more
enveloping, and sounds like a million bucks.
Also included is a
French 5.1 Dolby Digital dub, English and French subtitles and English
Closed Captions. 
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
Even given the sprawling length of the film, this two-disc set is
filled with plenty of extras. The screen-specific audio
commentary from Martin Scorsese was the real source of interest
for me, as my entire emotional reaction to the film was largely
predicated on why Scorsese wanted to make this particular labor of
love in the first place, as well as its tumultuous journey to the
screen. And while Scorsese makes for a wonderful guide through the
rigors of production, those expecting lots of grist will be
disappointed. Everything seems peachy-keen and surprisingly sedate.
Scorsese's enthusiasm shines through, don't get me wrong, but it seems
like many of the much-buzzed about controversies that held up the film
for so long are glossed over in favor of explanations of historical
and dramatic motivations. Scorsese is a great commentator - to listen
to this commentary even without watching the film first is worthy of a
rental - but I can't help but think it may have been toned down. (Note
that this is a full-length commentary, split across two discs along
with the feature.)
Next we have a 9-minute look at Dante
Ferretti's Set Design, a simply mythic creation of olde New York.
Watching this cinematic master concoct an amazing milieu for
Scorsese's dream project, as well as the cast and crew reflect on the
experience - both Cameron Diaz and Daniel Day-Lewis show up in various
interview segments - it becomes brain-bending to imagine just how much
work went into making this vast playground of a set. And while the 22-
minute Exploring the Sets of Gangs of New York may be a bit
overlong, if anything it shows the sheer vastness of the enterprise.
As Ferretti and Scorsese walk around, the scope of the production
really comes full circle: It is apparent that this is no mere
Hollywood soundstage with three rickety walls jerry-rigged to look
like a period-era city - this is the real deal. In addition to the
full-frame featurette, we get an optional 360-degree view, a pop-up
window that allows the viewer to take a cheesy full-range view of the
sets in question. It's a nice idea for an extra, but the conversation
and vicarious sense of wonder portrayed by Scorsese and Ferretti is
more than enough. 
Sandy Powell's Costume Design is
dissected next, and it's a fascinating peek at how the filmmaking team
"cheated" to get that special look so integral to Scorsese's vision,
from conceptualizing the wardrobes and characters to creating
thousands of glorious costumes at amazing effort and expense. Simply
astonishing. The History of the Five Points is a 13-minute
exploration of the historical realities and sociological mythology
behind Gangs of New York. We get reflections on the period from the
film's collaborators, as well as a nice history lesson from historical
advisor Luc Sante. This one makes it readily apparent that while the
film was directly inspired by real-life events, considerable liberties
were taken with the people and places to create a compelling work of
fiction. Also included is a Five Points Study Guide, an in-
depth text introduction from Sante, as well as a look at Five
Points Vocabulary from "The Rogue's Lexicon" by George Matsell
(1859). Wonderful icing on the cake.
All of the above are on
the first disc, while disc two features the more fleshed-out, 30-
minute documentary Uncovering the Real Gangs of New York, which
originally aired on The Discovery Channel. Using reams of old
pictures, documents and historical reminiscences, this is a wonderful
addendum to the 13-minute featurette on disc one even though some of
the information is a bit redundant. It's not the greatest in the world
- formally, it's pretty plain - but the information it houses may be
twice as interesting as anything in the film.
Rounding it out
are the usual promotional items. We're treated to the film's
theatrical trailer and teaser, both in Dolby 5.1 and
anamorphic widescreen and full screen, respectively. I always thought
the full trailer was a bit cheesy, relying too heavily on the summer
blockbuster graphics and titles flying at the screen for that added
oomph. However, it still made me want to see it, while the teaser is
even sillier, unfortunately emphasizing Cameron Diaz's
sometimes/sometimes-not accent and an over-the-top symphonic
underscore. Last but not least we have the U2 music video for
"The Hands That Build America." It is ridiculous. First of
all, the mix of the song used in the film is more "pared down" and
blandly melodramatic than the already-corny version included on the
band's 2002 "Best Of" compilation. It is even worse than the version
that accompanies the end credits of the film. Don't get me wrong -
Bono and the boys are the perfect choice for this movie (even if they
aren't even Americans!), but by sheer bad luck, the song they've
concocted is just plain bad. The video is ridiculous and stagy as
well, and is presented in its original 2-channel stereo mix.
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do you get when you pop the disc in
your PC?
The only thing here is a simple custom interface
with basic controls and weblinks directing us to Miramax online.
Parting Thoughts
Opinions are split on Gangs of New
York: If you've been gritting your teeth with anger reading this
review because you feel the film is an underappreciated and unfairly
maligned masterpiece, than this two-disc DVD edition is for you. The
transfer could have benefited from a cleaner print, but both the Dolby
Digital and DTS tracks are terrific. We also get a nice selection of
extras, making the $29.95 not too steep at all. Well recommended for
Scorsese fans.