As unstoppable as the Terminator himself, the DVD versions of T2:
Judgment Day just keep on a-comin' and a-comin'. One of the biggest
hits ever on home video, the James Cameron and Arnold Schwarzenegger
action extravaganza has been released in so many different
permutations that consumers can be forgiven for feeling a bit
overwhelmed. Now we have Artisan's new Extreme Edition, which promises
even more and better extras and a first - the ability to watch T2 in
full high-definition right off of your PC. Since most of you probably
already know what the movie is about, if you want tojust get to the
good stuff, click to zoom on down (Video, Audio,
Supplements or PC extras). Otherwise, if you are one of
the two or three people in the world who has not seen T2, here's a
little recap...
Since it is almost predestined that sequels
will be largely inferior to their predecessors, it is always a
pleasant surprise when a follow-up is as good as or even better than
the original. So I guess you're now expecting me to say that
Terminator 2 is one of those rare exceptions, but I'm not going
to, because I don't think it is. But, I won't disagree with anyone who
thinks differently, and I agree that Director James Cameron did manage
to do what he had already one once with Aliens, namely make a
sequel that doesn't suck. Released in 1984, the original The
Terminator was a tough, take-no-prisoners sci-fi sleeper that came
out of nowhere and heralded the arrival of Arnold Schwarzenegger,
action superstar. While in hindsight it may seem silly, Cameron
originally wanted Schwarzenegger for the part of the rebel sent back
in time to protect the "targeted for termination" Sarah
Connor and not The Terminator; the hero was ultimately played by the
slighter-of-build Michael Biehn. But Schwarzenegger wisely persuaded
Cameron to let him play the titular cyborg, and the rest, as they say,
is history. The film grossed over $40 million at the box office (not
bad back in 1984 for a low-budget sci-fi film with no stars), enjoyed
an even more incredible run on video and launched the careers of all
involved.
When it came time for the long-awaited follow-up in
1991, Schwarzenegger was now SCHWARZENEGGER!, and Cameron had
established himself as the preeminent action director in Hollywood
with Aliens and The Abyss. Carolco funded the massive
budget (which was probably more than the gross national product of
most third world countries) and T2 managed to do what few
sequels every had done, namely gross gazillions more than its
predecessor and earn the reputation by many that it was better than
the first. Alas, for me there is still something special about the
first Terminator that I think T2 lacks, and I even find
the sequel rather boring at times. 
I'm sure I'll incur the
wrath of angry T2 fans with this (great, more hate mail), but
here goes. James Cameron cannot write dialogue. He is a master of
action, plotting and pacing, and is a brilliant editor, but geez,
those lines he saddles poor Edward Furlong with! You gott love the
returning Linda Hamilton's sheer aggressiveness, but it must have been
hard to say some of these lines with a straight face. And even more so
in the extended cut, the film's middle section drags on and on. There
are some killer action sequences to be sure, but the film gets heavy
handed and laborious precisely when it should have just gotten to the
climax. Compared to the first Terminator, which made the best
of its low budget and was far more compact and streamlined in design,
Terminator 2 feels overbloated.
And now I'll say what
is heretical. I always thought the film's big effects coup, the
"liquid metal" T-1000, looked lame. I know, I know, it
unleashed the monstrosity that is "morphing" unto the world,
but even by the rules and structure of the fantasy world Cameron
created, the effect feels like a cheat. (But Peter, without
morphing we never would have had the imaginative special effect of
bullet time in The Matrix - Dan) While in the framework of the
film I could believe that a liquid metal Mr. Roboto could goop around
and kill people, I'm still confused as to how his clothes and skin
miraculously reappear at a moments notice. And where is his CPU
central processing unit located, and how are all the individual
molecules bound together? And how come whenever the T-1000 gets split
apart or blown up, all the pieces can still function? And if the
machine is supposed to be liquid metal by Earth standards (this is
still, after all, supposed to be a "realistic future"), how
does the metal heat itself up and cool itself off so quickly?
Perhaps I'm asking too many questions. The film can be a heck of a
lot of campy fun. It is just and one big action spectacle full of
explosions, car chases, lots of cyborg fighting and Edward Furlong
spouting lines like "Affirmative" in his mini-Keanu Reeves
baritone. And any movie that features a Terminator asking, "Why
do you cry?" has to be worth something. But what do I know? If it
has been awhile since you've seen Terminator 2: Judgment Day,
just sit back and crank it up. This new T2 Extreme Edition DVD
is pretty rockin', so let's see what Dan thinks of the quality...
Video: How Does The Disc Look?

Finally! A DVD of Terminator 2 has been released without
obnoxious edge halos. Having been disappointed by the transfer of
Artisan's August 2000 release of the Ultimate Edition - a
transfer that looked very much the same as the original T2
release of October '97, independent of the addition of the scenes that
extended the film - I was a bit wary. But for the Extreme
Edition Artisan has created a new 1080p24 high definition transfer
(the source of the proof-of-principle HD DVD-ROM experiment included
in this two-disc set).
This is a wonderful transfer compressed
with great care; this is made immediately apparent by the appearance
of the white opening titles. In every previous release, the white was
brighter at the transition between the interior of the letters and the
background. Here, the letters are uniformly white. This initial
impression was born out as I watched a lovely, detailed, film-like
presentation. Small object detail, like facial features in long shots,
and fine textures, like the weave of the institutional clothing worn
by Sarah Connor, are brilliantly conveyed to the screen. Shadow detail
in the many night scenes is first-rate. Compression artifacts simply
aren't there; I could see no mosquito noise or blocking. Pure colors
are conveyed with no chroma noise or smearing. My only nitpick is a
tendency of flesh colors to lean very slightly toward blue, imparting
a vague, unnatural pinkness. Regardless, it was a pleasure to revisit
the film with a new level of clarity. Well done.
Audio: How Does The Disc Sound? 
The Dolby
Digital EX mix is a blast. Very deep bass extends into the region of
tactile feel. Explosions, gunshots, any loud sound effects with
considerable bass energy have tremendous visceral impacts. Even the
bike that the Terminator appropriates at the beginning of the film has
a great sense of audible presence. A quick but strictly subjective
impression comparing this track to the EX mix found on the Ultimate
Edition was difficult since I had to swap out discs and navigate
through opening screens and menus before starting. I could be wrong,
but I was left with the impression that the average level had been
reduced on this Extreme Edition DVD to accommodate greater
headroom for a more impressive dynamic range. The surround channels
are very active and directional cues may be heard emanating from all
directions behind and around the viewer; the surround field imaging is
outstanding. Brad Fiedel's raucous score is reproduced with conviction
and bite. The dialog has great presence, particularly Linda Hamilton's
voiceover work; it is probably the best example of “in-the-room” voice
fidelity I have heard from a motion picture DVD.
The DTS track
found on the Ultimate Edition has been dropped in favor of a
couple of other audio options. An English track is mixed for the Dolby
Headphone process, which provides a simulated sense of three-
dimensional space with a pair of stereo earphones. And then there's
the commentary track that I'll describe in the supplement section.
The audio is supported by English and Spanish subtitles, and
English Closed Captions.

Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
To offer a third
release of this film on DVD, Artisan had to prepare something special,
and the studio certainly built some compelling extras into this
Extreme Edition. As in the Ultimate Edition, the
supplements are spread over two discs. The first disc contains the
extended version of the film, but as Peter published in a daily
column, the theatrical version is available as an easter egg
that utilizes seamless branching, “just go to the main menu, select
Play Extended Version, and click right five times on the remote.
Voila! You get the theatrical cut...”
There are two
significant extras on disc one, The Interactive Mode and a brand new
commentary. The Interactive Mode is accessible from the Sensory
Control screen. This text-based option simultaneously superimposes two
sets of factoids on the screen. In the upper left, shown in yellow,
are explanations of filming location. Sets, locations, and miniatures,
for example, are identified. On the bottom of the screen you'll find a
continuous collection of trivia in white lettering that relate
directly to the scene. This running text commentary is dense with
detail and very informative. Sometimes you'll see an arrow pointing to
a cameo; watch for Van Ling in the CyberDyne research center. From
time to time on the upper right, the Cyberdyne logo may appear.
Similar to the White Rabbit feature of The Matrix DVD, pressing
Enter on your remote control or computer will branch to a 4:3 video
snippet demonstrating the crew and players at work, or perhaps some
stills accompanied by comments or an interview. Owners of the
Ultimate Edition will recognize some of these elements. Artisan
has very thoughtfully window-paned these 1.33:1 interactive supplement
images in the anamorphic frame, so objects appear in proper proportion
without having to modify your display mode. Thank you Artisan; nicely
done.
The second supplement on this disc is a new feature-
length, screen-specific commentary with writer-director James
Cameron and co-writer William Wisher. This is a great conversation
between the two filmmakers in which the plot, the characters, and the
meaning of the film is discussed. More importantly, Cameron offers
fascinating details, trivia, and anecdotes from the shoot. He delves
into the technical aspects, describing the special effects and the
techniques used to fool the audience. Cameron is known for his concern
for detail, so he has a lot to offer. I thoroughly enjoyed this
commentary.
This is a THX certified DVD, so you'll also find
the THX Optimizer on this disc. Remember, these test patterns
only apply to this disc; they are not absolute, as you'll find on such
DVDs as the AVIA Guide to Home Theater.
The rest of the
supplements are on disc two. Click on Information Programs to get to
the featurettes. Wait too long and a naked Terminator will give you a
dirty look. Here you'll find a newly produced featurette by Van
Ling. In No Feat But What We Make (24:25), James Cameron, Peter
Jackson, Dennis Muren, and Stan Winston are prominently featured. They
discuss the early history of CGI and its development to present day,
including its application in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. The
short explains why Cameron should be considered the director
responsible for pushing CGI technology, first in The Abyss,
then in T2. Even Dennis Muren admits that T2 made
Jurassic Park possible. Some interview footage from 1993 is
integrated into the short, but much is new. This is a fine
documentary, informative and entertaining. The second short is
entitled T2: On The Set (8:23). This is a montage of candid
moments from the shoot. We see the filmmakers and the players at work
and at play. We also get to see the occasional goof, like when
Schwarzenegger hit Furlong on the head with a shotgun. Droll and
delightful.
Oddly, no trailers or other promos are included.
But wait, there is more...
DVD-ROM
Exclusives: What do you get when you pop the disc in your PC?
These supplements are also on disc two. Click on DVD ROM from your
InterActual Player and be transported to some clever applets in the
"T2 FX Studio." The first is the T-800 Match Move
Studio. This cute little application allows you to import a JPEG
file, match the shape and size of a translucent terminator skull to a
face, and then inflict some serious damage. The result can be exported
to another JPEG file for distribution. Just don't send the picture to
an ex-lover; you'll find yourself named with a restraining
order...
The second is the T-1000 Morph Studio. Once
again you can import a photo, or make that two; it's your choice. By
selecting from an array of icons representing the best match to the
pose of the subject in the photo, a wire frame overlays your picture.
You can then pull on a variety of handles to best match the shape and
size of the subject. If you had input a second image, the process of
matching is then done for the second picture. If not, you have the
option of selecting a T-1000 in all its chrome-like glory. You'll then
be free to morph one image into the other. Cool!
The last is
the Online Robot Challenge. You must be connected to the Web to
access this opportunity to design your own automaton. This is rather
fun interactive robot fight 'em game. Choose between different bots
(you can even name 'em, too), customize them, then send them into
battle against each other. Even if you choose the same robots and
match them up, you'll often get different results. This is a pretty
adddictive way to kill a few hours (just don't start playing at
work...you might get into trouble with the boss.)
I've left the
most interesting and most controversial supplement for last. It had
been widely reported that in March the DVD Forum would establish the
standards and specifications for the much-anticipated HD-DVD. That
deadline has come and gone. We've now been told that the fall of '03
is the earliest we can expect to hear from the TG1-1HD subgroup -
responsible for the “Creation of Video Format for HD-Video (HD-DVD9)”
- of the Forum's Working Group 1, which oversees DVD-Video
Applications. One can only imagine the politicking and lobbying going
on behind the scenes; after all, obscene amounts of money in the form
of royalties are involved.
It's been reported that DVD Forum is
assessing a number of new CODECs, including H.264, MPEG-4, MPEG-2 with
an enhancement layer, and Microsoft Corporation's Corona, which may be
found in its downloadable Windows Media Player (WMP) version 9. The
last is favored by Warner Bros. since it may permit the use of current
red laser DVDs in which Warner has a stake. In a bold and imaginative
move, this Extreme Edition DVD set includes a proof-of-
principle high definition transfer on DVD-ROM. The theatrical
version of Terminator 2 has been encoded and compressed for
playback using the WMP9 decoder.
The film has been telecined
at high resolution in the 1080p24 format. Then the images were
remapped to a resolution of 1440x816 anamorphic. The number 816 is
about right for the active number of rows in a 2.35:1 film digitized
at 1080p24 (or 1080i30, for that matter). The 1440 pixels across each
row is a compromise. The 1920 pixels were remapped to reduce the
amount of data (and reduce the requisite data rate) to permit more
available personal computers to decode the film without dropping
frames. During playback, the Windows Media player stretches the 1440
pixels per line to a restored 1920 pixels per line. Windows then
scales the image to the computer display's aspect ratio and its
graphics resolution as set from its desktop properties. This high
definition DVD-ROM test bed will have potentially 4.5 times the
resolution of a conventional DVD, but the remapping to the computer's
resolution will then diminish the viewable resolution. Even a display
resolution as high as 2048 by 1024 (1600 by 1200 is recommended) will
require that data from surrounding pixels are mathematically blended
during the remapping process to establish the RGB values for each new
pixel. Regardless of the algorithm, this may be considered a form of
averaging, which constitutes a low pass filter. The lower the display
resolution, the softer the image will become.
Getting your
system to play this high definition experiment will take some care.
First, visit the web site for your display adaptor. Download and
install the most recent device driver for your particular card. The
WMP9 player is already on the disc, or you can download and install it
from the Microsoft Media Player download page. (You may want to visit
the high definition demo page, as I did, to grab several rather
gigantic files.) When you configure your copy of WMP9, specify that
the application should acquire Digital Rights Management Licenses
automatically. Please note that Microsoft offers the following
disclaimer for proper playback of its high resolution demo files,
“Although other system configurations may be able to playback this
content, for an optimal experience we recommend systems of at least a
2.53 GHz Intel or AMD Athlon XP 2200+ or higher processor for 720p and
3.0GHz or greater processor for 1080p. For either scenario, an AGP4x
based NVIDIA or ATI video adapter card with at least 32 MB of RAM and
the most recent OEM driver updates is recommended.” (To the best of my
knowledge, there is no indication that you might be able to enjoy this
technology on a Mac any time soon.) My current platform is a Dell
equipped with a 2 GHz Pentium 4 microprocessor, so as I expected, my
final results were inconsistent. Some clips dropped frames. A 2 GHz
microprocessor does not seem to be enough, but my understanding is
that the first of a new generation of graphics boards that includes
hardware-decoding assist for WMP9 will be made available this month
for about $100.
The latest build of the InterActual player is
required and it's included on the Extreme Edition. When I read
the back of the DVD set's keepcase, at first I was somewhat
disheartened. The recommended system requirements for HD playback
include: Microsoft Windows XP Professional, Microsoft Windows Media
Player version 9, 512 MB of RAM, a 3 GHz Pentium 4, and a 128 MB/3D
video card. Damn! How many of us own such a machine? How many of us
even have such a platform as a home theater PC? But that hardware
decoding assist graphics card is beginning to look mighty appealing! I
pressed ahead and installed the latest InterActual player. Then I set
my graphics board hardware acceleration setting to maximum (otherwise,
the InterActual player will not function). (I had turned mine down to
correct a problem with WMP9 before I downloaded a new graphics board
driver, so I lost some time sorting that out. That's why I'm
recommending starting with the installation of the most recent driver
first.)
Also be aware that Artisan has imposed Digital Rights
Management (DRM) on T2's HD content playback. To playback in
high definition requires an active connection to the web so that you
can obtain a license from them. I found that once I had obtained that
license, I could play the HD content without having to reconnect to
the Internet. (The DRM license is currently good for 5 days.) So if
you choose to move your PC to your theater and connect it to a
frequency agile projector that can accept RGB-HV, please run the HD
content at least once on your computer monitor with an active web
connection before you shut down and move. (Of course, if you have a
telephone connection for a modem or high speed Internet access in your
theater, obtaining a license in advance isn't important.) I don't know
if the license has an expiration date or if it's good indefinitely on
the original machine.
I connected my PC to my projector through
my Extron RGB-HV switch and booted up. I then set up a new display
configuration on the projector and touched up the convergence and
image size. I was able to play the standard resolution DVD from my
Denon DVD-9000 player and synchronize that source with the high
definition version playing from my PC. That allowed me to switch back
and forth between the two presentations and, with a minimal delay as
my NEC projector synchronized to the scan rates, was able to perform
convenient A/B comparisons. So how did the HD content look?
I
must offer up-front that your experience will largely depend on what
compromise there will be between stuttering (dropping frames) caused
by your system's horsepower and screen resolution. The higher the
screen resolution, the more computational power is required to display
the images. The possible net gain in resolution over the standard
definition DVD has a full potential of 450%. Regardless, even reducing
my computer's display resolution down to 1024 by 768 pixels while
maintaining 32-bit color (the color depth also affects computational
requirements), there were clear visual improvements. The raster
disappeared, allowing me to get closer to the screen, which is more
involving. For relatively calm scenes, spatial resolution was
noticeably improved based on skin texture, clothing weaves, hair, and
other small details. Color balance and shadow detail remained the same
between the two sources.
However, as impressive as the Corona
CODEC appears to be, if you are forced to go with low bit rates
artifacts will be visible. When we first see Sarah Connor, she's in
her cell doing pull-ups on her bed frame. A close-up of Linda
Hamilton's face reveals beads of sweat as she repeatedly pulls herself
up into the frame. On the DVD, the beads of sweat during this dynamic
motion are clearer; on the HD content, the dynamic movement masks the
detail. And on more than one occasion, I noticed a subtle tearing in
small areas on the interface between a bright background and a briskly
moving dark object, like a swinging arm clad in a dark sleeve. At full
horsepower such problems will be rendered mostly moot, but I'm left to
speculate that at low bit rates, dynamic scenes will be adversely
affected while relatively static scenes will still look considerably
better than a 480p presentation of a conventional DVD.
I
suspect that the authors of this HD content fully expected it to be
viewed on a computer monitor, too small to reveal the advantages of
the higher resolution and small enough to hide the flaws. Let it be
said that the results will be splendid on a huge home theater
projection screen and the necessary firepower. The results must exceed
the performance of high definition digital videocassettes and over-
the-air ATSC transmissions. The issue becomes whether the extreme
computer requirements for this HD supplement of the Extreme
Edition is worth the investment, even if you have a great front
projector that can accept signals from your personal computer. I'd
welcome e-mails concerning impressions of this HD content from any of
our readers who routinely use very powerful home theater PCs connected
to HD-capable front projection systems. And please consider that this
noble high definition experiment only enhances the appeal of this best
yet DVD release of T2.
Parting Thoughts
Terminator 2 is the very definition of a bigger and better sequel.
It's got higher production values, bigger and better sound and an
equally compelling story. But the question remains, is it necessary to
buy a third version of T2? If you're troubled by the less-than-
perfect video quality of either of the first two releases, then yes.
If you'd like to enjoy Cameron's commentary and other new supplements,
yes. And if you want to playback T2 in HD on your PC (and even if you
find that your computer equipment is currently insufficient for HD
playback), this is a wonderful DVD set. What a pity that the standard
definition transfer's quality couldn't have been this good on an
earlier release.