How's this for an oddball sci-fi blockbuster? Signs is likely a
cinematic first, a mainstream Hollywood flick that so flipped the main
text with the subtext that I was tempted to sue for false advertising.
Your typical sci-fi horror potboiler throws plenty of monsters and
fantastic worlds up on the screen, and if you look hard enough, maybe
a pinch of subtext just to give all the pyrotechnics a whiff of
believability. But here comes Signs, perhaps the only monster movie
with so little monster it could easily be a "Touched by an
Angel" episode starring Mel Gibson. It's creepy, sure. Well
acted, sure. Tightly plotted, sure. But where's the payoff? I love
subplot as much as the next guy, but geesh, how about some visceral
thrills?
Mel Gibson stars as Graham Hess, a guy who hasn't had
too many breaks as of late. His faith shattered after losing his wife
in a horrible car accident, he decides to step down as the local
reverend, retiring to raise his brother, son and daughter in their
isolated farmhouse in Pennsylvania. But then late one night a most
peculiar occurrence happens, and the supernatural "signs"
begin to pile up. What are all those strange shapes out in the
cornfields? Are aliens invading our planet? Is God once again playing
tricks on the clan? Or has E.T. finally returned for more Reese's
Pieces? One of the few filmmakers working today who will
unabashedly proclaim his love for the genre flicks of yesteryear, you
can't totally dismiss M. Night Shyamalan. It's tempting to call him a
B-movie charlatan who just got lucky. An underdog of a thriller that
became the most unexpected blockbuster of the 90's, the success of The
Sixth Sense now means that he can rip-off any late, great horror flick
he wants, add in a few eager megastars, and gross over $100 million
without even batting an eye. But where's the fun? I wasn't a huge fan
of either The Sixth Sense or its even more pretentious follow-up
Unbreakable, because both were so heavy handed that they fizzled out
as genuinely exciting suspense yarns. Now with Signs, he's batting 0
for 3.
The documentary included on this DVD reveals what may
be my core complaint with his approach. Shyamalan talks of the films
that influenced Signs (The Birds, Night of the Living Dead and
Invasion of the Body Snatchers), but despite his smarts he seems more
interested in all the secondary stories and periphery character stuff
than the actual grist that made those classics so effective.
Was I wrong to expect some cool aliens and lots of big scares?
Shyamalan doesn't seem particularly interested in his aliens at all,
which are so chintzy they look like they came on loan from Close
Encounters R' Us. He'd rather focus on his story of a man reclaiming
his faith, but it's a tale so stale we've seen it done better
countless times before. Signs resembles not so much Hitchcock as The
Exorcist. Same story, different milieu. But at least that William
Friedkin classic delivered the goods. Is Signs scary? Not really.

The film will still work for many. Fans of more meditative
thrillers and religious treatises will love it. It's not a surprise
that Signs played unusually well with the over-45 demographic and more
faith-minded viewers. (I hear it's big with Mormons.) Signs is
refreshing in that it unabashedly wears its spiritual-minded concerns
on its sleeve, and is hardly the typical Hollywood blockbuster. But I,
for one, felt ripped off. After all the great trailers, I expected a
real suspense flick, or at least a kick-ass climax after all
that interminable buildup. Shyamalan does have some serious chops that
can't be denied: A strong eye, the rare ability to actually direct
actors, and an uncanny sense of timing. But do his films have to be
this boring?
Signs may end up being best remembered as the
first monster movie ever where the monsters were an afterthought.
"Oh, yeah, by the way, there's an alien in my kitchen," a
character says at one point. You could say the same thing about this
movie.
Video: How Does The Disc Look?
When I
originally saw Signs in the theater, I remember not being particularly
impressed with its visual look. It is not just that it is a very dark
film (which it is), but it's drab color scheme and near-obsession with
murkiness was very unappealing. So it goes with this DVD, which is
indeed an accurate representation of the theatrical presentation (at
least the one I saw). But that's not to say it's pretty to look at.

Presented in a THX certified, 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen
transfer, the print is in great shape. Aside from some minor grain,
there are no obvious defects to distract. Employing a lot of natural
and low level lighting, director of photography Tak Fujimoto (The
Silence of the Lambs) gives the film an often eerie feel, with all of
the nighttime and most of the interior scenes bathed in shadow. But
colors are generally drab save for a some strong blue and orange hues
and the occasional striking daytime shot. Given the low light, grain
is accentuated and the overcast skies give the film a very glum look.
Detail is lacking, especially shadow delineation. I had trouble making
out fine textures, and the transfer just isn't as sharp I expect from
a new movie.
More problems abound. I also noticed some
unfortunate edge enhancement, likely intended to pump up apparent
sharpness, but it results in distracting halos around most objects.
Also a drawback are the frequent compression artifacts. This very
slow-moving film is filled with long, static takes, which reveal
plenty of dancing blocks and general noisiness. This is still a pretty
good transfer, just not as lifelike and three-dimensional as one would
hope.
Audio: How Does The Disc Sound? 
Despite
this being a Vista Series release, Buena Vista has decided not to give
Signs the two-disc deluxe edition treatment -- a surprise given the
film's box-office success. Alas, with all the supplements, whatever
plans there may have been to include a DTS seem to have been dropped.
(All of Shyamalan's previous Vista Series releases included the
option). Despite this omission, included is a still pretty good Dolby
Digital 5.1 Surround EX track (although not labeled as such on the
packaging). But like the transfer, it is not quite as good as I had
hoped.
Let's start with the positives. Signs makes some of the
best use of ambient sound design I've ever heard, from all the eerie
cornfield sounds to those creepy alien radio transmissions. Surrounds
really come alive on this mix, with very impressive subtle details
clearly discernible in the rears. Unfortunately, that's the only truly
aggressive part of this mix, as the score is primarily confined to the
front soundstage. Dynamic range is excellent, and the .1 LFE pumps out
some serious low bass. But aside from the ambient effects, this mix
could have been more enveloping, especially with James Newton Howard's
sparse but powerful stinger cues. This unique mix is certainly eerie,
but I bet a stronger use of the surrounds would have made it a
classic.
Also included is a French 5.1 Dolby Surround EX dub,
English captions for the hearing impaired encoded as subtitles, and
true English Closed Captions. 
Supplements: What Goodies
Are There?
As the latest in Buena Vista's new Vista Series
line of filmmaker-approved special editions, this one-disc set of
Signs may seem a little slim by comparison. Previous Vista titles,
such as Shyamalan's own The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable and the
behemoth that was Pearl Harbor, were all multi-disc affairs that
offered a bit more than what you'll find here. Surprising given the
film's big box office success, Buena Vista has not opted to put all
the extras on a second disc and throw in a DTS track, and many of the
goodies that are standard these days (trailers, anyone?) are nowhere
to be found. Hmmph!
Such grumblings aside, the highlight of
this set is undoubtedly the new 58-minute documentary The Making of
Signs. Divided into six parts - "Looking for Signs"
(6:11), "Building Signs" (8:02), "Making Signs"
(22:33), "Effects of Signs" (8:31), "Last Voices: The
Music of Signs" (8:26) and "Full Circle" (4:48) - it's
as slick and polished a doc as you're going to find on any DVD these
days. Shyamalan is apparently not a fan of recording commentaries for
his movies, but this doc does go a considerable way towards making up
for the omission. Produced by longtime Spielberg collaborator Laurent
Bouzereau, it features a bevy of interviews with cast and crew, but is
definitely Shyamalan's show all the way. Very well paced and
structured, the doc gives a nice overview of the entire process, from
conception to production to the effects to final release. Highlights
include the creation of real gigantic crop circles (Night is not a big
fan of relying too heavily on opticals and CGI), the impact of 9-11 on
the shoot, and a pretty cool look at the development of the monster
effects. Also a real benefit is a considerable amount of on-set and
post-production footage included, as a little of Shyamalan can go a
long way. Newly-conducted interviews also lighten the load, including
chats with producers Kathleen Kennedy, Steven Mercer and Frank
Marshall, composer James Newton Howard, production designer Larry
Fulton and storyboard artist Brick Mason, plus older on-set interviews
with the cast, including Mel Gibson, Joaquin Phoenix, Kieran Culkin,
Cherry Jones and Abigail Breslin. The doc is presented in full screen
and 2.0 stereo, and no optional subtitle or captions are included.
With no commentary or other making-of material, the other
main extra are the 7 minutes of deleted scenes: "Graham
and Merrill," "Flashbacks #1 & #2," "Dead
Bird," and "Alien in the Attic." All of these run just
30 seconds or so, except "Alien in the Attic," which is the
only must-see, as it offers at least a little bit of tension. All the
scenes are presented in non-anamorphic widescreen off of video dubs;
the quality is not terrible but not great. Also included are multi-
angle storyboard presentations for two scenes: "Graham, the
Knife, and the Pantry" and "Graham and Merrill Chase the
Trespasser." Each sequence can be viewed from two angles: Either
the final sequence, or an animated storyboard, plus your choice of
three soundtrack options: Effects only, score only, or the final
composite. All are in 5.1.
Rounding out this set is a short 2-
minute clip from M. Night Shyamalan's first alien film. It's
always fun to get to see a big Hollywood filmmaker's early works, but
this film is so bad it hurts. But Shyamalan himself provides a short
video intro to the clip, and even he makes fun of it. Last but not
least is a nice 10-page full-color booklet with some brief
notes on the extras.
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do you get
when you pop the disc in your PC?
Nothing really here. The
usual Buena Vista interface pops up, which includes basic DVD controls
and weblinks, but no actual ROM extras.
Parting
Thoughts
While my expectations led me to believe Signs
would have a little more monster and a little less schmaltz, fans of
more meditative sci-fi will likely love M. Night Shyamalan's latest.
As one of their Vista Series editions, it's Buena Vista's most meager
effort yet. A good transfer and sound mix and a nice documentary make
for a fine buy, but it's certainly not as full featured as fans
probably will want. Still, it's well worth checking out for
Shyamalan's legion of admirers.