Released last summer to middling box office and general audience
apathy, why was A.I. Artificial Intelligence so hated? It's almost as
if Steven Spielberg just can't have more than two or three solid hits
in a row without the public and the critics turning on him. Sure, you
can argue A.I. is not the auteur's best film, but why did some despise
it so?
By now, you're well aware that the film was a
legendary, one-of-a-kind collaboration between two very different
filmmakers. It began with Stanley Kubrick, who toiled with the project
for years before turning it over to his friend Spielberg, who finished
it posthumously with the full cooperation of the late auteur's estate.
Considered either a stroke of brilliance or a colossal mismatch
depending on which side of the fence you sat on, the film marks the
merging of two very different sensibilities, the warm and fuzzy
Spielberg with the intellectual, unsentimental Kubrick. It worked for
some, failed miserably for others. But rare for a mainstream Hollywood
film, there was no middle ground. Few films have polarized audiences
as much as A.I., but the film achieved a power amid the chaos that
even the harshest critic could not easily dismiss. Though it
wasn't quite what I expected, I found myself intrigued and often
enthralled by A.I. It was exciting to see a filmmaker of Spielberg's
stature turn down an easy jackpot like Harry Potter in favor of such a
complex and risky project, and whatever its faults, has there been a
more unique film to come out of Hollywood in the past decade or so?
The basic premise - robot boy searches for love among the androids -
is as reminiscent of Spielberg's past work as it is Kubrick, and isn't
as much of a mismatch as it first appears. Perhaps it is the tonal
shifts that threw viewers off, for A.I. is not an easy film. Rare for
Spielberg, he often sacrifices the emotion for the intellectual, if
not altogether successfully. But isn't flexing one's muscles in new
directions usually painful?
Since the film is full of left
turns, I don't really want to say much about the plot for fear of
ruining the surprises, but suffice to say it is fairly well structured
into three tight acts. However, like many viewers, I felt the ending
went on for far too long, and the climaxes on top of climaxes felt
wrong and too much like old-school Spielberg. Harder to argue with is
the film's impressive production design. The concepts, sets, effects
created for the film are visionary - often bold and audacious, this is
a future world well worth exploring, with images new yet oddly
familiar. Even those I know who absolutely hated the film found at
least something startling to see and hear, and how exciting to see a
future world like this back on the big screen! This is no Blade
Runner, or even a Star Wars, but borrowing heavily from the world of
Philip K. Dick, I was often fascinated by the world Kubrick and
Spielberg realized so magnificently. 
Finally, you can't talk
about A.I. without praising the film's underrated performances. While
that little Haley Joel Osment is so good he's scary, he's already
being taken for granted as an actor. After his Oscar-nominated turn in
The Sixth Sense, he may not be able to live that triumph down, but
he's just as good here, if not better. Easily his equal is Jude Law,
who manages to make his Gigolo Joe more real than most of the human
characters, and his relationship with Osment is the heart of the film.
And also impressive is the supporting cast, especially the underrated
Frances O'Connor as Osment's conflicted "mother" and, in a
smaller role, Sam Robards as David's uncaring dad.
Is A.I.
perfect? Hardly. But for a Spielberg film the lack of polish is
exciting, and this is a film that I believe will be rediscovered and
reevaluated in years to come. So don't let the mixed buzz turn you
off. Love it or hate it, A.I. is a trip well worth taking... at least
once.
Video: How Does The Disc Look?
Presented
in 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, this is a strong presentation of
difficult material. Spielberg, working with director of photography
Janusz Kaminski, has created a unique, oddly techno-organic world that
is hard to describe. The film is both slick and colorful, yet often
hazy and muted, which this transfer conveys very well.

Transfer-wise, this is about as good as it gets. The print is
pristine, with only some visible grain in the more low-light, high
contrast interiors to distract. Blacks are rock solid and contrast
excellent across the entire grayscale, if rather dark on the low end.
The image has a very "hard" look at times that some may
dislike, but it appears to reflect the stylistic preferences of
Kaminski. Colors are often vibrant to the point of oversaturation, but
noise-free with accurate fleshtones. Conversely, some scenes appear
intentionally and heavily desaturated. Sharpness is very good,
although much of the film appears soft due to the use heavy filters,
while shadow delineation is generally excellent, for a striking three-
dimensional appearance. Edge enhancement is thankfully minimal, and
even with all the hazy and smoke-filled interiors, I noticed little in
the way of compression artifacts.
A separate pan & scan
version is also being released, featuring the exact same features and
audio specs. But please, don't buy that one!
Audio: How
Does the Disc Sound? 
Though not labeled as such, A.I. is
presented in both Dolby Digital Surround EX and DTS matrixed 6.1 ES,
and this is an excellent, reference quality presentation irrespective
of audio format. Like the film itself, this veers wildly in many
different directions, so hang on. Aside from John Williams' minimalist
score which nicely fills out the front soundstage, the effects can go
from a whisper to a scream. Overall balance between the music and
effects is excellent across the board, and dynamic range up there with
the best of soundtracks. Gary Rydstrom's excellent sound design is
often striking, with some passages featuring low, droning tones then
quick bursts of starting, loud effects. The rumbling "Flesh
Fair" is highly aggressive, with nice use of discrete surrounds
and excellent imaging from front to back.
Comparing four
scenes, the DTS track feels a bit cleaner, fuller and more natural in
realizing the ambient noises, but either track is impressive. Dialogue
is also very well-rendered on either mix, though better balanced on
the DTS track. I noticed improved rendering of the hushed and low-
level spoken tones when comparing two of the early scenes, and stereo
separation is improved on the DTS as well. Also a bit more pronounced
is the low end; either mix is sure to please, but the DTS had a bit
more "kick" to it. But whichever way you go, this is a great
presentation.
Also included is a French 5.1 Dolby Digital dub
and a matrixed English 2.0 Dolby Surround track, along with English
Captions and French and Spanish subtitles. No true English Closed
Captioning is provided. 
Supplements: What Goodies Are
There?
With two whole discs full of fun, aside from the
lengthy 12-minute introduction Creating A.I. featuring Steven
Spielberg, producer Kathleen Kennedy and longtime Kubrick associate
Jan Harlan, the main feature gets a whole platter all to itself. Pop
in disc two for all the goodies, which all combined, run almost two
hours. And yes, no audio commentary is included, but what's here is
comprehensive enough that you're likely to forget...
Given
unprecedented access to Spielberg's top secret project, DreamWorks
Home Entertainment and DVD supplement producer Laurent Bouzereau have
come back with a diary-esque look at the entire experience of making
A.I., from conceptualization to post production. To make it easy to
access and navigate, Bouzereau and DreamWorks have decided to divide
up the material into various segments, each detailing a particular
facet of the production. Aside from my one main nitpick, which is the
lack of a "Play All" function, this is an overall excellent
documentary with a logical, well-thought-out structure. Told primarily
with video footage, the high level of access to the set pays off in
spades, with plenty of behind-the-scenes footage from almost every
department involved. Adding depth and background is a robust archive
of still material,included as an appendix to the main documentary.
Normally, I'd go through each bit piece by piece and critique it,
but given the approach here, I'm going to diverge from my usual format
a bit and offer some overall impressions first. I found Bouzereau's
unique perspective refreshing, and it is not as rigid as it first
appears. Aside from some funny names for the featurettes ("A
Portrait of Gigolo Joe" really made me laugh) and a bit of fluff,
these add up to more than the sum of their parts, or what I initially
feared, lame EPKs thrown together. Adding context is the added
perspective of not only from the main participants being featured, but
their fellow cast and crew. And for once, we actually get more than
just a how-to on CGI effects, with considerable focus on the non-
technical aspects of the film. I suppose I could voice some
complaints, such as the usual fawning over Spielberg, or wanting more
detail on certain aspects of the film (how the hell did Ministry get
in there!?) but you can't include everything, can you?
I'm just thankful that for once, a documentarian has attempted to
tell a real story, not just create bulletpoints.
That said,
here's a brief overview of what you're gonna get. Up first is a rarity
for a DVD making-of, a look at the acting process. Acting A.I.
includes two segments totaling 18 minutes, "A Portrait of
David" and "A Portrait Of Gigolo Joe." Haley Joel
Osment and Jude Law are obviously featured here in surprisingly
intimate interviews, discussing how they became involved with the
project and working with Spielberg. By the way, am I the only one who
thinks that Osment is so mature for his age that it's creepy?
Up next are two sections on the more practical aspects of
undertaking such a huge production. Designing A.I. includes a
pair of 8-minute looks at "From Drawings to Sets" with
artist Chris baker (aka "Fangorn") and set designer Rick
Carter, and "Dressing A.I.," a visit with costume designer
Bob Ringwood. The Baker interview is rather fascinating as he was one
of the few artists to work with Kubrick during the early stages of the
project, and the Ringwood chat benefits from a closer look at each
character's particular costuming requirements. Lighting A.I. is
a short 6-minute chat with Spielberg's longtime collaborator Janusz
Kaminski, who sometimes warbles unintelligibly but is quite funny, and
comes complete with one really ugly scarf!
Moving on to
the creation of the film's unique visual effects, let's start with the
8-minute Special effects. Production designer Rick Lantieri
gives us a closer look at the "Flesh Fair" sequence and the
surprisingly amount of "practical" effects required to pull
it off, as well as the meshing CGI with real-world trickery to achieve
the final product. The 13-minute Robots Of A.I. was probably my
favorite of the effects segments, as I thought the film's
"mechas" were way-cool. After Spielberg offers a bit of
perspective on what he hoped to achieve with the visuals, Stan Winston
and his team at Stan Winston Studios, makeup artist Ve Neill, and
"Voice of Teddy" Jack Angel give us a peek at how they
realized his vision. The best part for me was the creation and
operation of little Teddy, who's my favorite character in the movie
and a pretty impressive mix of CGI and old-fashioned puppetry. (Where
can I get one?) Rounding out the effects coverage is Special Visual
Effects and Animation: ILM, a 22-minute examination of the film's
startling visual effects told in five parts - "An Overview,"
"The Robots," "The Miniatures," "New York
City Sequence Shot Progression" and "Animating A.I."
Here we build on what came before, with ILM's talented crew of
animators and designers taking the pre-shot footage and
"plates," then adding the required CGI elements. Once again,
Bouzereau's structural skills pay off, as even for a
"layman" like me, the technical mumbo jumbo actually made
sense! And the initial "Overview" section adds some much-
needed and enjoyable perspective on the original gestation of the
Kubrick project.
Last but not least we have the The Sound
and Music of A.I., Is there any other aspect of the filmmaking
process more taken for granted? "Sound Design"' is a 7-
minute in-studio chat with Oscar-winning sound designer Gary Rydstrom,
and the highlight here is his demonstration of a scene, and how he
plays and layers sounds to the movie. Rydstrom also discusses his
approach to realizing the film aurally, and the preparation required
recording sounds for such a daunting task as A.I. And then we have
Spielberg fave John Williams, getting his 6 minutes of fame in
"The Music." Okay, let me think,
"Williams...Williams...Williams? " Why does that name sound
familiar? Didn't he score some other small Spielberg films...?
Finally, in closing out the video-based supplements, we get the 3-
minute coda ...In Closing: Steven Spielberg - Our Responsibility to
Artificial Intelligence. Over the DVD's rather extensive credits,
Spielberg waxes philosophical on the nature of Man versus Machine and
the ultimate theme of his film. Don't we all just want a Teddy to call
our very own?
Since so much of A.I. was developed and
conceptualized before Spielberg even got directly involved with the
project, DreamWorks and Bouzereau have wisely not skimped on the still
archives. Boasting a more robust gallery than I've seen in quite a
while, The Archives features the film's theatrical teaser and
trailer (labeled "Trailer 1" and "Trailer 2") in
non-anamorphic widescreen, and five sections totaling about 250
stills. "Storyboards" gives us breakdowns of three scenes -
"Joe's Good-bye," "David's Leap" and"David
and the Blue Fairy" - and it's easy to use, but alas no real
descriptive text is included. Cooler is "Chris Baker's
Portfolio," which offers 9 sections of Baker's various concepts
and designs, as well as the "Production Design Portfolio,"
offering another 9 sections of more detailed black and white and full
color drawings and final designs. More concepts can be found in the
"ILM Portfolio," which offers detailed art for five key
scenes as well as the film's robot creations. Last up in the archives,
we get two galleries of behind-the-scenes and publicity stills taken
by David James during and after production, "Portrait Gallery
Photographs" of the films cast, and "Steven Spielberg Behind
the Scenes Photographs." Although again no text is included,
these offer nice insight on the development of the film's visual look
and provide nice background for the featurettes.
Rounding out
the supplements are the usual text-based items including fairly good
filmographies on the cast and filmmakers, and sparse
production notes presented both onscreen and printed in the
enclosed 4-page foldout.
Alright, now here comes a few
obnoxious criticisms. I would have liked for all the supplemental
features to have been presented in anamorphic widescreen. I know that
sometimes full frame supplements are an aesthetic choice to
differentiate them from the main feature, but hopefully the industry
as a whole will begin to adopt 16x9 across the board in the future? I
was also surprised that all the supplements featured French and
Spanish subtitles, but none in English. It was nice of DreamWorks to
include the foreign language options, but what about the English-
speaking and hearing impaired?
As for the contest itself, I
also would have been interested to learn more about the voice talent
and the all-star cameos, and perhaps a bit more on Francis O'Connor,
who I felt gave an underrated performance. The early stages of the
Kubrick project also are not examined that much, nor any initial
script drafts. (Hello, DVD-ROM!) But putting such tidbits aside, and
even with no "Play All" function, this doc does what the
best of them do, tell a story that enhanced my appreciation for the
film. So, if you're a fan at all, you should find a great deal here to
discover and enjoy.
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do you get
when you pop the disc in your PC?
Unfortunately, no ROM
features are included at all. Given the complexity and popularity of
the film's original website, which was one-of-a-kind and full of
secrets, it is a shame more is not included here. Weird.
Parting Thoughts
Another excellent release from
DreamWorks, this is a must-have for fans of the film and well worth a
look for those interested in intelligent sci-fi. With a great
transfer, soundtrack and plenty of insightful supplements, this is a
no-brainer. Don't let the mixed reaction turn you off... A.I.
Artificial Intelligence is one of the most underappreciated films of
the last ten years.