Earlier this year, I produced a feature film shot with a digital
camera. The name of this film and its inherent fabulousness is not as
important as what I learned while making it. But before that,
understand for our purposes here, I'm not talking about George Lucas-
digital. I'm talking about digital as another word for "low
budget." And these days, any kid can scrape together enough
allowance to rent a Sony Betacam SP, MiniDV or Hi-8 and make a movie.
But that does not make you a good director any more than having a
driver's license makes you a good driver.
Before filming
began, the director and I watched many digital features. The bad films
had many things in common. The good films had one thing in common. In
every good digital feature we saw, the concept was simple and the
parameters were small, which made the use of a digital camera logical,
if not obvious. Going digital made sense for that story, it was not
just a way to save money. Take for instance, "The Blair Witch
Project." A group of kids in the woods stare into their camera
and tell the audience how terrified they are. Simple concept with a
low budget look actually built into the story. Or how about Thomas
Vinterberg's devastating "The Celebration." A simple family
gathering turns ugly and is told in voyeuristic fashion using a
digital camera. In all, we found that the narrower the dramatic focus,
the better the chance the audience will forgive your low-budget look
and just be absorbed in the story.
Bad digital films
assume that any story filmable in 35mm is also filmable in digital.
This, of course, is wrong. "Air Force One" would look
ridiculous shot on MiniDV. Bad digital films are also lit as if
they're on film. This is also wrong, and may result in your film
looking flat and flavorless. Bad digital films never compose shots in
a creative fashion, thus constantly reminding you they look like home
movies. This is even worse. I don't get too creative when I videotape
my 8-year old cousin, but then again, I don't expect Miramax to give
video of my 8-year old cousin a platform release.
Weeks
after filming on my digital movie was finished, The Anniversary Party,
shot in 19 days using a Sony DSR-500, was released in theaters. The
director and I hoped the film would do well, which in turn would boost
the fortunes of all digital films. The movie did okay niche business,
and it really only boosted the fortunes of journalists writing about
the onslaught of digital films.

In The Anniversary Party,
Joe (Alan Cumming) and Sally (Jennifer Jason Leigh) celebrate the
sixth anniversary of their stormy marriage by inviting some friends
over for a party. Guests include superstar actress Skye Davidson
(Gwyneth Paltrow), aging actor Cal and his wife Sophie (Kevin Kline
and real-life wife Phoebe Cates). Also attending are the director of
Sally's current film (John C. Reilly), his neurotic wife (Jane Adams),
a sexy photographer (Jennifer Beals), the insecure guy who looks like
Peter Sellers (Michael Panes) and Sally and Joe's neighbors (Denis
O'Hare and Mina Badie).
The evening moves along with
little drama until Skye brings out tabs of ecstasy for the whole group
to partake. With everyone's spine now devoid of fluid, each
individual's long-buried emotions come bubbling to the surface. At
this point most films of this type would devolve into an insufferable
actor's workshop. But The Anniversary Party keeps it together. Credit
goes to writers Leigh and Cumming, who juggle a surprising amount of
characters, all of whom have issues, all of which are sorted out with
no confusion. Performances are strong down the line. It's especially
nice to see Phoebe Cates onscreen again. Also great is Mina Badie, and
I'm not just saying that because she also appears in my digital film
(okay, maybe I am).
In the end, The Anniversary Party is
able to overcome two hallmarks of a bad movie: it's about whiny actors
and the horrible lives they lead, and it stars performers proud of
themselves for working at a fraction of their normal fee "for the
art, man!" It's a testament to the talents of those involved that
the film becomes a compelling look at secrets and lies we keep from
everyone, including ourselves.
Video: How Does The Disc
Look? 
The Anniversary Party was shot on a Sony DSR-500 and
in post-production was treated to look more like film. As such, the
following will not be a surprise: the movie looks terrific. It's
presented in anamorphic widescreen at a 1.85:1 aspect ratio. Black
levels are deep, strong and consistent. Cinematographer John Bailey
gives the film a slightly over-saturated look that is rich and
stylish. He also blows out windows on occasion and the result never
tears or shows any chroma noise. As expected, the print quality is
excellent: no dirt, no scratches, no specks. Fleshtones occasionally
have a slightly processed look, but that is entirely the choice of the
filmmakers and it looks terrific. There are no edge enhancements and
no artifacting or pixelation, even in the slowest fades-to-black.
Since the film is digital and has been treated to look more cinematic,
I wouldn't call this reference quality in the way "Planet of the
Apes" has becomes a reference standard. But the picture exhibits
a nice amount of style, presented exactly as Leigh, Cumming and Bailey
wanted it with no blemishes.
Audio: How Does the Disc
Sound?
There are two audio options on the disc, 5.1
surround and stereo 2.0 surround. Considering this is a film about a
bunch of people talking, there are still strong differences between
the two mixes. The 5.1 track is much subtler, a little more creative
and not as aggressive. The Stereo Surround is louder and uses the
center channel more for dialogue. Lefts and rights are used liberally
on both mixes, but on the 5.1, crosstalk and whispering are better
integrated. Fidelity is good in both mixes and there are no hisses,
dropouts or other audio blemishes. Considering the budget and the
locale, both mixes display an admirable amount of range and the
dialogue is clear and easy to understand. Bass activity only comes
into play during the extensive use of needle drop music, but it does
sound fine. There is no imaging at all, but then again, in a film that
takes place in one location, there's little opportunity for
imaging. 
There is no foreign language options on the disc, only
English Closed Captions and subtitles.
Supplements: What
Goodies Are There?
Somehow, I expected more and better
supplements for the film, but what is provided is satisfactory. First
off, I liked the Main Menu on the disc. It's not flashy; in fact, it's
just the opposite. There is little movement in this menu, but the
design is simple and sparse using pastel colors. It was a different,
spare, oblique way to go and I appreciated it.

The
highlight of the extras is a scene-specific audio commentary
from co-directors and stars Jennifer Jason Leigh and Alan Cumming. The
two have rather flat speaking voices, however, they are still fairly
interesting. Most of the conversation has to do with character
motivations, but since all the actors are friends in real-life, there
is some non-threatening gossip. There is some talk of the freedom of
shooting digital and Leigh especially was grateful at the 45 minutes a
day she saved just by not checking the gate, as you would using film.
The other major extra is a 20-minute Sundance Channel
program called Anatomy of a Scene. In this supplement, Leigh,
Cumming, cinematographer John Bailey and editor Carol Littleton
discuss the scene where each character proposes a toast to the wedded
couple. The filmmakers talk of how each actor was required to write
their own toast (except Paltrow, whose speech was in the script) and
how each one further deepens the interconnectedness of the characters.
The video for this supplement is surprisingly average. It seems
practically taped off the television and although the special is
presented in widescreen, at times there are lines of noise running up
and down the entire screen. Also, the audio varies. The interviews
with Leigh and Cumming, taped in a more controlled environment, sound
okay, but the interview with Bailey tears significantly. On the plus
side, here is the only chance to see the Sony DSR-500 in action and
the filmmakers are moderately interesting.
The
theatrical trailer is also included. It's presented in
anamorphic widescreen and looks as good as the film. No specks, no
dirt, no nothing. The audio is fine for a trailer: dialogue comes from
the center channel, but the music and narration use the lefts and
rights. There are also Cast and Crew credits, but oddly enough,
it's all cast, no crew. And yes, I know that CO-directors Leigh and
Cumming are cast AND crew, but I would have liked bios on at least
D.P. John Bailey, composer Michael Penn, and editor Carol Littleton.
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do you get when you pop the disc
in your PC?
The included ROM features are minimal. Just a
nice screenplay viewer with the complete script with direct
scene access, weblinks to the film's theatrical website, and
New Line's "Hot Spot" portal.
Parting
Thoughts
The Anniversary Party spends an inordinate amount
of time teetering on the brink of self-indulgent dross, but somehow,
it never tips over. The script, the performances and the sheer novelty
of the exercise make it an interesting experiment. The DVD however, is
a mixed bag. Although the average moviegoer couldn't care less what
camera was used to shoot the film, cineasts would have appreciated a
DVD that embraced the uniqueness of a digital film being enjoying
using a digital video player. Alternate takes, angle options, behind-
the-scenes footage or a short documentary on shooting digital would
have honored the film and acknowledged its small, but noteworthy place
in moviemaking history.
Putting that aside, for those who want
to see some terrific actors prove you can cry on cue, even when
getting paid scale, The Anniversary Party is a strong rental
suggestion. For those curious about digital moviemaking, you won't get
the behind the scenes glimpse you were hoping for, but the film is one
digital production that got it right.