Based on the acclaimed British miniseries Traffik, Steven
Soderbergh's Oscar-winning epic Traffic unfolds slowly, and contains
several interrelated storylines, an approach which could have been the
kiss of death both at the box office and with critics. But as the
film's huge success can attest to, the film avoids the didactic and
remains accessible and relatively easy to follow. It also snagged
numerous Academy Awards and made most critics top ten lists, becoming
yet another triumph for Soderbergh.
Javier Rodriguez Rodriguez
(Benecio Del Toro) is a Mexican state policeman who is operating in a
corrupt system. Rodriguez follows the written rules (within reason),
but it is the unwritten rules (like accepting bribes) that are
continually conflicting him. At the heart of the problems in northern
Mexico is the illegal drug trade, and Rodriguez soon finds himself in
the middle of the supposed war on drugs. In nearby San Diego
Montel and Ray (Don Cheadle and Luis Guzman) are two narcotics agents
who are trying to ensnare an alleged drug dealer (Miguel Ferrer) so
that they can go after an allegedly even bigger drug dealer, whose
wife (Catherine Zeta Jones) is completely unaware of his alleged
activities. Meanwhile, across the country Robert Hudson Wakefield has
recently been named the country's new drug czar. Wakefield has been
named to the position despite his apparent naivete about the causes
and solutions to the drug problem in the United States. In an ironic
twist his daughter (Erika Christensen) becomes the antithesis of what
his job (politically, anyway) is supposed to stand for.
First and foremost Traffic is an entertaining film. It does have a
powerful message, but it rarely becomes preachy and contains quite a
few surprises and suspense. It is not an action movie, but the movie
does contain some action scenes, and it certainly is not lacking in
confrontations. Soderbergh masterfully intertwined the different
storylines and characters; his Academy Award win for Best Director was
well deserved, as were the film's wins for Best Adapted Screenplay,
Best Supporting Actor, and Best Film Editing. Yet, oddly, Traffic
actually managed to win all these awards and yet still failed to
capture Best Picture, losing to Gladiator! I guess the logic used by
Academy Awards voters is not much better than the logic behind our
country's drug policy? 
As usual with Soderbergh's films, the
acting is top notch. While Michael Douglas plays a well-educated, very
articulate character in nearly every film he appears in nowadays, he
does it so damn well that I cannot really complain. He delivers one
line in the film to his wife that is so cold-hearted that it had me
wincing, even when I knew what he was going to say. Miguel Ferrer also
usually plays the same character, that of the sleazebag, and about the
only actor better at that is James Woods. Don Cheadle and Luis Guzman
have strung together some impressive performances in the last five
years, and as a team their chemistry is superb. The one role that I
was really concerned about was Catherine Zeta Jones as the wife of the
drug dealer. Jones manages to pull off this complex role, though I
still remain skeptical about her acting talents. Maybe Soderbergh
deserves a lot of the credit due to his skill at directing actors? He
did win Julia Roberts an Oscar after all...
Video: How Does
The Disc Look?
The notes in this second DVD release of
Traffic refer to it as a "new digital transfer," but even
doing back and forth comparisons between this and the previous USA
Home entertainment movie-only release, I could not detect a huge
difference.
The picture does seem a little more stable and less
edgy in spots (like on window blinds and other fine details), but the
difference is subtle. For a new movie, Traffic is difficult to judge
because of its three different looks: the bluish tint of the Ohio
scenes, the washed-out look of the Mexican scenes, and the relative
normalcy of the San Diego scenes. These San Diego scenes certainly
meet the excellence standard, but the quality of the other scenes will
be in the eye of the beholder. 
Though the image is a bit soft
in these scenes compared to the clarity of San Diego, surprising
detail is present despite the radical alterations that the film went
under to achieve that specific appearance (which is superbly
illustrated in the film processing supplement). The bottom line is
that it is safe to assume that this is exactly how Traffic is supposed
to look. If you have the older DVD, and are thinking about upgrading
to this release, do it because of the extras, not because of the
improved video quality, because the difference is not pronounced
enough to warrant another purchase for most people, except the
perfectionist crowd.
Audio: How Does the Disc Sound?
The first time I reviewed Traffic, the fact that the movie is
largely monaural except for the score went by completely unnoticed.
Now, watching it for the third time recently, I still did not notice
that the movie is mostly monaural, though that is a good indication
that this atypical mix actually works. This mono mix is actually
discussed in two of the audio commentaries, and the effectiveness of
the music is certainly enhanced by this unorthodox utilization, as it
compliments the somber tone of the subject matter. 
Despite the
preponderance of sound being directed to the center speaker only, it
never sounds limited in any way with nice dynamic range. Otherwise,
the track does obviously lack envelopment, but the .1 LFE does enhance
a few scenes, and again the score is nicely deployed throughout the
soundstage. Weird, but it all works.
Also included are English
subtitles and English Closed Captions.
Supplements: What
Goodies Are There? 
Director Steven Soderbergh is a veteran
of recording commentary tracks; he is consistently entertaining
and knows what to talk about, though on occasion can get very
technical, especially here, thanks to his being the uncredited
cinematographer on the film, using a pseudonym in the credits. He is
also joined by screenwriter Stephen Gaghan, who speaks very calmly and
does not have the same verbal sparring that is present with
Soderbergh's commentary partners on The Limey or the Ocean's 11
commentary tracks, but at least Gaghan is informative and brings up
interesting topics. Worth a listen for those more interested in the
nuts and bolts of guerilla filmmaking.
The second commentary
features multiple participants: producers Edward Zwick, Marshall
Herskovitz, and Laura Bickford, and consultants Tim Golden and Craig
Chretien. Zwick and Herskovitz were recorded together, but the other
three participants were recorded separately. Criterion is very good at
editing these things together, and on this track the scene specific
comments flow together well with the rest. Zwick, Herskovitz, and
Bickford provide plenty of background information on the production,
while the two consultants discuss the factual accuracy of the film.
Probably the best sign that this is an entertaining commentary track
is that it really flew by and seemed a lot shorter than the film's two
hour plus running time.
Composer commentary tracks are
sometimes a snoozefest, but the third track by composer Cliff Martinez
is halfway entertaining and very informative. When Martinez is not
talking, the score is isolated and the two are nicely edited as not to
conflict. Alas, Martinez's monotone delivery could not be any more
dry, and at one point he makes a joke and has to explain that it was
in fact a joke. (Remarkably, Martinez was a member of the Red Hot
Chili Peppers during the 80s, a fact which makes it into his
discussion.) The track is very organized and well thought out, and
Martinez managed to keep my interest throughout despite my ignorance
of the technical side of music. Martinez has been a longtime
collaborator with director Steven Soderbergh, and he discusses this
relationship extensively. The track even contains some of the music
that "hit the cutting room floor" during the editing
process, described on the packaging as "two music cues."
This set also includes no less than 25 deleted scenes
presented in anamorphic widescreen and in such fine condition that
they could be inserted into the movie quite seamlessly, had Soderbergh
wanted it. 25 sounds like a lot of scenes, but the total running time
is only about 25 minutes. Yet these are not throwaway scenes, in that
many could have easily been left in the movie without weakening it a
bit. Soderbergh emphasizes in his commentary about how he likes to
tell his stories as quickly as possible and so some quality scenes had
to be excised.
But wait, there's more. The 30 minutes of
additional footage, or so it has been labeled on the packaging,
actually consists of more deleted scenes (or footage that was shot but
was never included in any cut of the film), though this time its rough
looking, with timing numbers above and below the frame. Some of the
footage contains an angle option, where you can select different
camera angles merely by hitting the angle button on your DVD player
remote.
The first collection, consisting of documentary style
footage taken at the El Paso Intelligence Center, contains three
different views. The second collection is a look at the insides of a
drug warehouse. This dull drug warehouse footage is thankfully
accompanied by commentary by Traffic consultant Craig Chretien, who
thoroughly explains how and why drugs are stored after they have been
confiscated. One of the most talked about scenes in the film before
its release was the scene in which Judge Wakefield and several
prominent people are at a social gathering, with Wakefield asking
various people for their opinion about the drug problem. These
prominent people included several people who are not actors, but
rather people whose names or faces you might recognize, particularly
if you follow politics. This scene is not very long in the film, but
on this supplemental disc all the footage from that day of shooting
has been included. Three selectable camera angles are provided. The
final set of footage is a scene involving Seth and Caroline walking
the streets, looking to score some drugs. The scene has three takes,
with two different angles are provided for the first two.
A
look at the Technical Art of Filmmaking is provided by further
sections on "Film Processing," "Editing," and
"Dialogue Editing." The Film Processing section breaks down
the multi-step process that was used to achieve the look of the Mexico
sequences. The commentary accompanying the alterations of the film
will cause some people to grab for their film dictionary, but the
video demonstration will be an adequate explanation for most people.
The Editing section, with commentary by editor Stephen Mirrione,
examines the complicated process used to edit this complex film. This
part is highly technical and difficult to follow. Switching between
two views using the angle button and the option to select between the
sound of the scene and Mirrione's commentary help but the explanation
is still rather dense. The Dialogue Editing section is easier to
understand, and it probably the most interesting technical explanation
of the three. While it is nice that Criterion has included these
extras, for many people they will be little more than an illustration
of how complicated contemporary filmmaking can be and to opaque.
A plethora of unremarkable trailers is included. The
"U.S. Teaser Trailer" accomplishes the commercial goal of
making Traffic look like an action movie. A much different and fairly
balanced "U.S. Trailer" does a better job of telling
audiences what the movie is really about. Five TV Spots are
also included, though they are repetitive and contain a lot of quote
hype. All the trailers and spots are letterboxed, though none are
anamorphic. The final extra on the second disc is an option to step
through a large collection of trading cards. These cards are
loosely connected to the movie, in that each card contains the picture
and statistics for a specific drug/currency-sniffing dog. The DVD
could have done without this extra, but it is amusing nonetheless.
DVD-ROM Exclusives: What do you get when you pop the disc in
your PC?
No ROM extras have been included.
Parting Thoughts
In short, buy this Criterion release
for the supplements, which are some of the best extras you're gonna
find on a DVD these days. But if supplements don't appeal to you, you
can easily pick up the existing movie-only version and still go home
happy. At $39.95 this Criterion edition is pricey, but fans of the
film will likely find it more than worth it.