219 USER REVIEWS
-
By David on
Sun, Nov 13, 2011 9:25 AM EST
This movie is not a perfectly good movie but awesome with the effects. The critics are wrong with this movie the guy that directed this movie gets a kudos from me. My favorite creature was Splitface the most awesome creature and is as realistic to the …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Mia on
Wed, Nov 9, 2011 12:37 AM EST
I am a big fan of the original, i had never even seen the movie until recently (2011) because the commercials had always made it seem so scary when i was younger during tv airings. I didn't know what the thing was and i was too scared to find out …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Neil on
Mon, Nov 7, 2011 2:11 PM EST
I loved the 1982 version of The Thing. 30 years later You'd think the creature effects would blow you away . Going to see this movie just lets you know how good the 82 version was. Not a big difference visually. Still a good movie with a great pr …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By JOE M on
Mon, Nov 7, 2011 12:13 PM EST
Sorry folks,
The Thing from Another World (often referred to as The Thing before its 1982 remake), is a 1951 science fiction film based on the 1938 novella "Who Goes There?" The Thing was played by James(Marshal Dillon) Arness. Go rent it! Great …more»2 of 2 people found this review helpful-
By ed on
Wed, Nov 2, 2011 11:01 PM EDT
im a huge fan of john carpenters version and the original...i was honestly expecting to be dissappointed by this film but was totally suprised by the final product...it weaves it's way into carpenters film perfectly and has moments of wtf???really?in …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Larry on
Wed, Nov 2, 2011 6:54 AM EDT
I hated the movie it was terrible, Ok first of all they did not follow the way the movie was supposed to go, 2 of the guys from Norway were supposed to survive and chase the dog towards the american camp at the end, they blew up the helicopter which they …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Jesse O on
Tue, Nov 1, 2011 10:35 PM EDT
There are a few areas the movie could have explored that the '82 version did not. Instead of taking the opportunity to perform and carry out one of these exciting items, it choose to be more of same...
First, 29 years later, the graphics look less …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Michael T. on
Tue, Nov 1, 2011 9:42 PM EDT
Yep, made it yesterday to front row. I usually watch it on front row so it’s a habit for me to watch it on first row even though other rows are empty, lol. Not a bad movie but has a few broken parts such as earring shown zooming in once but no zoom …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By andrew on
Fri, Oct 28, 2011 6:41 PM EDT
its a prequil and a damm good one very surprised but very pleased now please go see this movie it is well worth the moneymore»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By D on
Fri, Oct 28, 2011 4:14 PM EDT
I like both versions movie versions of Who Goes There? by John W Campbell. I was really looking forward to seeing this movie when it came out but was unsure how they were going to do it with the whole WHITE OUT look with a female hero. If you liked …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful
-
Top Box Office
- 1.$70.2M
- 2.$35.8M
- 3.$23.9M
- 4.$3.2M
- 5.$3.0M
- 6.$2.8M
- 7.$2.3M
- 8.$2.2M
- 9.$2.2M
- 10.$1.2M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-