41 USER REVIEWS
-
By Kendall on
Sat, Jul 17, 2010 10:02 PM EDT
After two horrible movies captivated by Roger Moore (Octo***** and view to a kill) it seemed as if the bond franchise had finally hit rock bottom. NOT. with the appearance of timothy dalton into the scene, he brought a darker, less funny bond. At first …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Thu, May 28, 2009 1:41 AM EDT
The story was very thin and some of it made no sense and was just pointless. The acting was awful. The new actor who played James Bond was just the worst Bond out there. The direction was mediocre and the visuals were mediocre, at best. Overall, it is …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By brendans on
Sat, Jan 17, 2009 9:43 PM EST
I liked this movie.I thought it was good.
It had good acting.It had classical Music in it.
It had a swimming pool in it.more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Jonathan G on
Sun, Jan 11, 2009 3:55 AM EST
Timothy Dalton makes a bland choice to play Bond. Bond is not that proper. Not only that, this movie had lack of action. Of course I don't mind the impossible stunts that Bond does. But seeing Timothy Dalton as Bond is enough.more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By on
Thu, Nov 27, 2008 3:14 PM EST
dalton is 3rd place in my opinion of best bonds since people say he is close to the books, and the books are better than its movies.
shame he only did 2 films.
very good film.
i reccommend ALL bond fans to watch this movie.more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Cordaro9418 on
Sun, Jun 29, 2008 4:05 PM EDT
The writing for Communisim was on the wall, even if in small print. Afghanistan was playing a crucial role, but no where near as it would in the future of politics. Aids had finally exploded to a degree where even the President had to acknowledge it.
…more»3 of 3 people found this review helpful-
By Brett U on
Tue, Aug 28, 2007 12:08 PM EDT
I've got something to tell all of those Pierce Brosnan fans out there that might upset them. Ready? Alright, here goes: Timothy Dalton saved the James Bond franchise. That's right. Pierce Brosnan is a fine 007, and Dalton's Bond fliks …more»12 of 14 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Sun, May 20, 2007 11:01 PM EDT
Awesome film. It's different from most of the other Bond films that seem to rely heavily on the "end of the world" formula. This film has great action, great story which is different from other films. It's a lot better than the contemporary …more»8 of 8 people found this review helpful-
By Steve Armando on
Fri, Apr 20, 2007 3:17 PM EDT
This movie was terrible as was Dalton's dry and boring acting. Don't waste your time with either this piece of crap or his other dog License to Kill. You won't miss anything if you just skip these two movies in the series. Trust me, if you …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Wed, Jan 31, 2007 5:48 PM EST
Timothy Dalton is as good as the other 3 actors as the famous 007, but there was a catch. George Lazenby quit after On Her Majesty's Secret Service in 1969. Sean Connery quit after Never Say Never Again in 1983. Roger Moore quit after A View to A …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful
-
Top Box Office
- 1.$72.5M
- 2.$50.1M
- 3.$5.0M
- 4.$4.6M
- 5.$4.6M
- 6.$4.1M
- 7.$3.6M
- 8.$2.5M
- 9.$2.5M
- 10.$1.1M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-