It's 2012 and my grandson "made me" watch "one of the best films of all time".
A great film doesnt depend on a jerky plot going all over the place and relentless action sequences which are unbelievable and almost impossible to happen in reality, AND, impossible to survive in reality. The plot seems like it changes every 10 minutes to provide a lead-in to another explosion. I would like to see the plot progression as it was being written. I think it was formed with that thought in mind.
Heath Ledger has been lionized by 75% of the reviews I just read as better than "sliced bread". His tongue flicking is mentioned. He didnt use it consistently, though, so I think he just thought it up as he went along and then forgot it again. The way he recalled his scars differently throughout was effective.
Was this film a serious one or are we to figure out when to take it seriously and when to view it outside of reality?
Was Batman really in love with Rachel or more in love with doing the right thing? Throughout the film I had the impression it was Rachel although he said otherwise, and then he goes to rescue Harvey Dent instead of Rachel. AND, why didnt anyone else go to Rachel's aid? By leaving out anyone trying to save her she is made quite meaningless.
How did the Joker have all those spectacular feats accomplished with just a few henchmen? Just one example suffices - the hospital explosions - there were about 40 of them. AND it was really gratuitous; as he is walking away, after he has wreaked his havoc inside, only then does he blow it up.
Was the Joker schizophrenic (sp)? How does one with that condition have the mind to set up all these elaborate plots? Serious or comic?
I know why Gary Oldman wore a mustache.
A great film doesnt depend on a jerky plot going all over the place and relentless action sequences which are unbelievable and almost impossible to happen in reality, AND, impossible to survive in reality. The plot seems like it changes every 10 minutes to provide a lead-in to another explosion. I would like to see the plot progression as it was being written. I think it was formed with that thought in mind.
Heath Ledger has been lionized by 75% of the reviews I just read as better than "sliced bread". His tongue flicking is mentioned. He didnt use it consistently, though, so I think he just thought it up as he went along and then forgot it again. The way he recalled his scars differently throughout was effective.
Was this film a serious one or are we to figure out when to take it seriously and when to view it outside of reality?
Was Batman really in love with Rachel or more in love with doing the right thing? Throughout the film I had the impression it was Rachel although he said otherwise, and then he goes to rescue Harvey Dent instead of Rachel. AND, why didnt anyone else go to Rachel's aid? By leaving out anyone trying to save her she is made quite meaningless.
How did the Joker have all those spectacular feats accomplished with just a few henchmen? Just one example suffices - the hospital explosions - there were about 40 of them. AND it was really gratuitous; as he is walking away, after he has wreaked his havoc inside, only then does he blow it up.
Was the Joker schizophrenic (sp)? How does one with that condition have the mind to set up all these elaborate plots? Serious or comic?
I know why Gary Oldman wore a mustache.
Top Box Office
- 1.$70.2M
- 2.$35.8M
- 3.$23.9M
- 4.$3.2M
- 5.$3.0M
- 6.$2.8M
- 7.$2.3M
- 8.$2.2M
- 9.$2.2M
- 10.$1.2M