1740 USER REVIEWS
-
By Paul on
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 7:55 PM EST
This James Bond film was one of the better ones, even though it was centered around revenge. It would be hard to continue off of Casino Royale if there were no more books left! It isn't the director's fault he had to hire a new writer for the …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By jaustin on
Mon, Feb 2, 2009 11:05 PM EST
James Bond, Jason Bourne and Jack Bauer stuck in an abandoned steel mill...only one can get out alive - who do you think will win? Pity the ground the steel mill is on! I suppose you can add John Rambo and John McClane to that for added fun and stick …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Jemps on
Mon, Feb 2, 2009 8:56 AM EST
I actually liked the title theme song by Jack White and Alicia Keys; I thought it was modern, evocative and punchy, not too dramatic. Or perhaps because I respond well to the White Stripes' brand of music. But while the sexy sand women were cool it …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Chuck on
Sat, Jan 31, 2009 6:51 PM EST
A little darker than your average Bond but I still enjoyed it. Fire scene at the end could have started better.more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By on
Fri, Jan 30, 2009 11:08 AM EST
...I think that Casino Royale was the better movie. Don't get me wrong, I like Daniel Craig as Bond. He brought something very new and different to the franchise that it desperately needed. I just think this movie lacked the focus its predecessor …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By johnb on
Wed, Jan 28, 2009 5:12 PM EST
this movie is awsome ,i didn't think they could do it again but they did.daniel craig was born to play bondmore»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By David on
Tue, Jan 27, 2009 10:35 AM EST
This movie out of the starting block is full of action. Not as good as Casino Royale but it is a great sequel. Daniel Craig is a great James Bond and a awesome choice to carry on the James Bond character. He brings the cool image with an athletic touch. …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By on
Sun, Jan 25, 2009 6:42 PM EST
This 007 movie didn't fit in with any of the previous ones. What the !@#$ happened to Q and all of the cool gadgets? This was a mediocre beat-'em-up movie at best. Action scenes were fair at best as well. Plot was not as interesting as the previous …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By gypsyveg on
Sun, Jan 25, 2009 2:07 AM EST
But I liked it. During the movie I was trying to remember what happened in the last one. It was great to see some of the same characters. I really like Daniel Craig as Bond. I know lots of people think Bond movies have changed too much, but I'm ok …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By AletaL on
Sat, Jan 24, 2009 9:13 PM EST
If the story wasn't going to be semi-realistic, then it should have gone for grand adventure. Instead, it was simply boring, average, and unimaginative.
The acting was neither witty nor intelligent nor provocative nor emotional.
The bad guys left …more»2 of 2 people found this review helpful
-
Top Box Office
- 1.$116.6M
- 2.$20.7M
- 3.$11.0M
- 4.$9.6M
- 5.$8.3M
- 6.$7.1M
- 7.$6.3M
- 8.$6.3M
- 9.$4.1M
- 10.$3.0M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-