Phantoms(1998)- User Reviews

33 USER REVIEWS
  • star33

    There was a lot of changes from the book. A lot of interesting things were changed or cut from the movie that are in the book. Some people died that were supposed to live. There was a good job with Stu, really good job with him. What I found was interesting …more»
  • star55

    Great horror entertainment. The story couldn't be better when it comes to creativity and horror-related thrills. The acting is mediocre, but what did you expect? There's action, gore, great special effects, excellent storyline...this movie …more»
  • star44

    I loved it. It floppedfincancially in the movies but that often happens with his material. He's not always a happy every afer type but I like his stuff. I wish he'd do more but the famiuly vallues types hae him because he's not the happy …more»
  • star33

    When a young woman brings her younger sister to the sleepy town of Snowfield, a mysterious force has made the people of the town either vanished or become horribly mutilated. Sounds like a decent story so far, right? Well, it goes downhill from there. …more»
  • star55

    it was really good, had me a little confused in the beginning, also i dont think the monster was all that scary, they could have come up withs omething more creative...but the story itself was so damn goodmore»
  • star44

    Being a huge Koontz fan, I enjoyed Phantoms. But I have to say that I liked the book much better. The acting was pretty well down, I found Affleck's character was really likeable as well as McGowan.more»

Pagination

(33 reviews)