1108 USER REVIEWS
-
By christianf on
Tue, Nov 20, 2007 10:10 PM EST
sucky no no no /bore snore me was jdncxmnbj`njcx …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Chinasonic on
Sun, Nov 18, 2007 9:53 AM EST
Not for a moment was I entertained with a great story nor did I see any great acting..... Hmm, maybe it's about actors who make millions each film and yet don't put any ummph into their acting ability. the only thing i saw on screen was a bunch …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By robert on
Sat, Nov 17, 2007 11:41 PM EST
Very dull movie, it does not carry your interest for very long. Left room for a minute to get something to eat and did not miss much. Not enough laughs; Sinatra"s movie was much better; Story line is terrible,you do not know where it is going …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By MattP on
Fri, Nov 16, 2007 11:24 PM EST
It isn't very often when a movie comes along with true reflections of a long-past age, while adhering to a very modern style.
The diologue is witty (a present-day rarity), the acting is top-notch, the camera shots are clever, and the style/fashion …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Ken on
Fri, Nov 16, 2007 10:54 PM EST
THIS CHAPTER IN CROOKS AND CON MEN WAS ALRIGHT I CANT BELIEVE THEY KEPT ALL THE STARS TOGETHER YET AGAIN IT SHOWS DONT TRUST ANYONE ESPECIALLY BUSINESS MEN THEY ARE JERKS "DTA"more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By dcharchuk on
Fri, Nov 16, 2007 3:52 PM EST
It's not as much fun as the first two, though it's better than 12 because it doesn't have a blindsided, silly twist. It's very slick and stylish, as expected, and the cast oozes chemistry, but the plot is fairly weak, relatively speaking, …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Jay M on
Thu, Nov 15, 2007 1:04 AM EST
I have to say that I am really happy after seeing this that I only paid $1.08 to see it. I just don't see how Hollywood can keep making films like this and keep rolling in the daugh as they do?
I must be the one who is really stupid here because …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By EhudR on
Tue, Nov 13, 2007 7:49 AM EST
Even though this movie could have been better I was still suprised how good it was. I mean it wasnt that good. It was ok, but I thought it would be the same old movie with all the cocky actors. Bradd Pitt, Matt Damon, and the cockiest, George Clooney …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Sun, Nov 4, 2007 4:46 AM EST
I never saw the first two, don't know why, but this is a good movie to watch.
This is a nice payback movie. Picino plays screws his business partner played by Elliot Gould out of casino being built in Nevada. Well, this pisses off Clooney's …more»3 of 3 people found this review helpful
Top Box Office
- 1.$72.5M
- 2.$50.1M
- 3.$5.0M
- 4.$4.6M
- 5.$4.6M
- 6.$4.1M
- 7.$3.6M
- 8.$2.5M
- 9.$2.5M
- 10.$1.1M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-