Jurassic Park III(2001)- User Reviews

the visuals are more developed and powerful than the original movie but not alive like in the
(jurassic park) also the directing was less thrilling and the story itself was cold.more»

Well the dinosoaurs still looked good but you can only go to the same watering whole so many times before you are eaten by T-Rex, or maybe Spinosaurus Egypticus. It was pretty predictable, nothing new here but some fun with Pteredons ( pteredactyls ?). …more»

Wow, this movie is terrible. Not only does it trash the reputation of an otherwise fantastic actor, William H. Macy, but it perpetuates the crappiness of a film series that should've stopped at number one.

STORY: Absurd. They go to the island to …more»

Super for sending a chill down your spine!This movie and its sequels are a worthy collection.Any regular movie-goer would like these movies.more»

I saw this movie and I didnt like it it wasnt like any of the others. Even this one was worse than THe lost world. ***** this movie it suckedmore»

I love JP3! it rox!! to bad Spielberg didn't direct it, but it was still AWSOME!! i cant wait till JP4!!!more»

Spinosaurus was by far the best part of this movie. T-rex, had been the big thing in the previous 2 films, and it was great that something even more powerful was introduced. The fight between Spinosaurus, and T-rex, was amazing, but should have been …more»

I Personally love jurassic park, but this was disappointing. Did the director see the lost world. In the Lost World, John Hammond said "There are no fences!" What does he do? He puts fences, and some new dinosaurus!more»

This movie was horrible. Just like Jurassic Park 1 and 2. This again looked like a good movie but it wasn't a good movie. It stunk.more»

one word is used to describe this movie horrible!!! this movies was worst than king kong, at least this movie was half the length. not worth seeing at all.more»