177 USER REVIEWS
-
By MGA on
Wed, Nov 16, 2011 12:35 AM EST
What director Clint Eastwood succeeds in this film is his deft handling of character subtleties and emotional restraint. He does this through his masterfful calibration of his talented actors, all set within the lush landscape of mood, tone and framing …more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Otter on
Wed, Nov 16, 2011 12:01 AM EST
This movie moves at snail speed. I fell asleep, not something I normally do at movies. I love Clint Eastwood but not this one. I couldn't get over the terrible makeup, very distracting.more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Bob on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 11:25 PM EST
Very poor movie about a very compelling historical character. Very slow, poorly directed, and I don't even want to get into the make-up------but many in the theatre were giggling.
But what bothered me the most was the suggestion that Hoover's …more»2 of 3 people found this review helpful-
By AlbertS on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 9:49 PM EST
Was it Eastwood's desire to destroy the image of Hoover as a tough guy who created the FBI? Seems the picture illustrates this, that Eastwood was primarily looking to show us a strange, weird and gay (but not acting on it) guy who, though he was entirely …more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Free to be you and me on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 9:32 PM EST
walked out. bad words.
bad make-up
did A chimp write this?
Is eastwood blind?
TV movie for yung folks who
do not realize that TV used to employ writers.
Clint needs to retire and practice his piano.more»2 of 3 people found this review helpful-
By Donald on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 9:13 PM EST
A Totally Dull Listless Motion Picture.
The Made for TV Movie with Broadrick Crawford was ten times better. Eastwood even missed four
different timelines in the movie. De Caprio was even uninspiring in his performance. I expected to be outraged by a …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Cally on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 7:42 PM EST
Whether Hoover's impact on the US was negative, positive, or somewhere in between, I thought his story must be a fascinating one. Here was an opportunity for fabulous character development both of the man and his contribution to what has become the …more»2 of 4 people found this review helpful-
By Bionic D. on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 7:07 PM EST
Very informative and great way to learn history. The acting could not have been better. Leonardo was amazing. Eastwood's direction did a fine job of keeping the audience from confusion, even though scenes flipped back and forth in time.more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By 1lOVE on
Tue, Nov 15, 2011 5:51 PM EST
WHY DICAPRIAO?WHY????
Okay, yes it was based on a true story but the story is as boring as ^!!. No action, except for an explosion in the first 5 minutes (makes you think you are going to be entertained for the rest of the 2 hours and 2o minutes!!. …more»1 of 2 people found this review helpful
Top Box Office
- 1.$70.2M
- 2.$35.8M
- 3.$23.9M
- 4.$3.2M
- 5.$3.0M
- 6.$2.8M
- 7.$2.3M
- 8.$2.2M
- 9.$2.2M
- 10.$1.2M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-