Drive(2011)- Trailers

Drive
DriveR, 1 hour 40 minutes

Driver is a Los Angeles wheelman for hire, stunt driving for movie productions by day and steering getaway vehicles for armed heists by night. Though a loner by nature, Driver can't help falling in love …More ยป

Starring: Ryan Gosling, Carey Mulligan, Albert Brooks, Bryan Cranston
 

16 comments

  • Mary Sunshine
    Mary Sunshine  •  Miami, Florida  •  4 days ago
    Agreed w/ OP. This movie hung in the air with a style that reminded you of a feeling you only got on "those nights". I guess it is a separation of the ages of things people respond to, but you had to be there (late 70's early 80's, or at least be able to get the vibe of them) to get this movie. Born late 80's still remember the feeling of the music. If you don't like - don't watch but don't try to assume you get it at all. The music was hypnotic, love it! The movie posters: very sexy, and I don't even like Gossling.

    Off topic Kids 1990 and forward have been exposed to too much tech. It makes them really bored with everything it seems. Tech gives me migrains.
  • Arcade4Life
    Arcade4Life  •  Tucson, Arizona  •  2 months ago
    I don't even think this movie will get pirated.. It's soo bad. I rather watch the notebook,and I hated that to. Stare at the dog taking a crap was more entertaining.
  • thespectralsorrows
    thespectralsorrows  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  3 months ago
    The Good: Cinematography, Actors/Acting
    The Bad: Dialog, Story
    Result: Decent movie.
  • Jason
    Jason  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  3 months ago
    I feel sorry for whatever life you must have that would lead you to enjoy this movie.. awful
    • A B
      A B 3 months ago
      100% agreed
    • Damian
      Damian 5 days ago
      I have a great life and believe me I've enjoyed the movie a lot...it's a first movie in a long time I have watched a few times in a row...and in your case I'd rather stay with Fast & Furious.

      Btw: don't look into other people's life cause it make u look like u don't have any...have a good life all...
    • Mary Sunshine
      Mary Sunshine 4 days ago
      I feel sorry for the feelingless technology induced coma you had to live in to not give other the right to like a movie with out idiotic criticisms.
  • louh
    louh  •  Highlands Ranch, Colorado  •  3 months ago
    what a horrible movie..so stupid..what was the point of him wearing a mask in the beach crash sceen..god this movie sucked
    • Fidge
      Fidge 3 months ago
      You're an idiot
    • Diaa
      Diaa 3 months ago
      looooool .. I wondering too about this point .. looooooooool
    • Fidge
      Fidge 3 days ago
      @Diaa -- You have an inquisitive mind like me! Hahahahahahahahaha!
  • Randy
    Randy  •  3 months ago
    I'm glad I only spent a dollar for this movie.It was a weak remake of the 1970s film The Driver starring Ryan O'Neil.Check out The Driver's chase scenes on You Tube.
  • Justin V
    Justin V  •  Surfside, California  •  3 months ago
    I thought it was brilliant. very refreshing.........I feel sorry for those who can't appreciate its finer points.
    • A B
      A B 3 months ago
      what finer points? the movie is so awkward and random?
    • No Fun League
      No Fun League 2 months ago
      I'm tired of people who adore this movie pretending that anyone who doesn't equally adore it "missed" something. I got it all. Understood it loud and clear. And the genre, the styling, the long stares, the lack of dialog, the lack of character arc, the anti-hero with the unknown background....these are all things I love to watch. But I also need to have some semblance of a story, and the story in this movie is paper thin at best. Cranston's character is an overly expository (forced) joke, the mobsters are laughable, the love story is forced quickly, and the romantic partners have zero chemistry. To get more specific, the Driver is so savvy and streetwise, yet he turns his back on Albert Brooks to be stabbed? And why wear the mask at the pizzeria when they already know who he is? Like many other things in this movie, the answer is: for purely visual effect. He's so concerned with the well-being of the mother and kid, yet he still gives his spiel to the would be pawn robber about how he'll leave him high and dry in five minutes.

      What I'm sorry for is that all the art house, indy lovers who are fawning over this movie are perfectly capable of analyzing it and finding the gaping holes in the story, but are unwilling to.
    • Justin V
      Justin V 2 months ago
      you are certainly entitled to your opinion, no fun league. I partially agree with some of your critiques but the things I liked.......I liked a helluva lot. I can also watch MANY universally-regarded great movies and point out things that don't make sense or are poorly done.

      so, mask at pizza place? if I was going to murder someone who knew who I was I'd probably like to look like someone else as well. not sure why you'd use that as an example.

      spiel about only waiting 5 minutes? that's just the way he works........waiting any longer is too dangerous, apparently. him helping at all at for no fee shows quite a bit of care, in my opinion.

      love story forced quickly? lol.....it's hardly a love story and isn't meant to be. there are only feelings starting to develop and that's all it has to be. one can only guess, but I would assume the driver has had a very cold life with little or no affection (especially with women)......explaining why he'd say his time with her and the kid was the best thing that happened to him. I like this part of his character.

      ..........anyway, if you don't like the movie it doesn't mean you're wrong or you are blind. it's your opinion and that's fine.
  • NINA
    NINA  •  3 months ago
    I'm going to be brutally honest. Don't waste one dime seeing this movie. The best part of this movie was then end. I rather be watered boarded then to have to watch such a waste of film.
  • Aelfgyva
    Aelfgyva  •  Milwaukee, Wisconsin  •  3 months ago
    One of the slowest paced films in many a year. The pauses are copius, ubiqutous and interminable..... so overdone they become meaningless. Pause..... stare........... stare....... stare some more, and finally say:..........."yes". Of Lordy, it is painful to watch such overindulgence broken by brief moments of fleeting action before returning to more endless pauses and stares and frowns and on and on and on. Do yourself a favor and skip this one.
  • Rick
    Rick  •  Aurora, Colorado  •  3 months ago
    The movie was great and even the ending was great. You have to keep in mind what he told the girl. He said he probably wouldn't be coming back, possibly to protect her in that way. I wanted to see them end up together as well.
  • Denise
    Denise  •  Meriden, Connecticut  •  3 months ago
    SUCKED, enough said!
  • Kevin
    Kevin  •  Spartanburg, South Carolina  •  3 months ago
    You are absolutely right. This movie was a waste of time. Beautifully written critique. Thank you.....thank you..............................................................................(10 minutes later) thank you. *stares blankly*
    • The Finger
      The Finger 3 months ago
      LMAO!!
    • DV
      DV 3 months ago
      LOL- I give 5 stars to Gator for the perfectly accurate review and another 5 stars to Kevin for the perfectly hysterical reply.
  • Patrick
    Patrick  •  3 months ago
    This movie is right up there with... oh wait; no one should want to remember this movie, nor the complete and utter dumbfounding effect it has on its gullible viewers that got duped into watching it. The trailer gave it the possibility of being appealing, and the opening scene gave you the slight thought it could have potential, then... pause... nothing... The writers must've said to the actors before filming that they would have few lines to memorize, and to leave the rest of the film to the director so that he could attempt to create something "artistic", but really only ended up being awkward moments of elongated silence with a slew of cinematic effects and loud obnoxious music that should've stayed in the 80's films they were derived from.
  • Joan
    Joan  •  Seattle, Washington  •  3 months ago
    wow Ryan Gosling, why!? The movie lacked stimulation & substance. *yawn* makes me tired mentioning the movie.
  • Andy
    Andy  •  Elgin, Illinois  •  2 months ago
    This was a great movie. It is a surreal action flick. Sort of like Micheal Mann's Thief, but more surreal. It wasn't supposed to be like real life, but more like opera of violence and suspense. It had me hooked, and on the edge of my seat. The mood of the film stayed with me for quite some time. Definitely will have to see again.
    • Denise
      Denise 13 days ago
      I don't think we watched the same movie.....
  • ken
    ken  •  Ocala, Florida  •  3 months ago
    OK this was the WORST movie directed and produced............ The Actors deserve a break, the cuts we so dumb why in gods green earth is he not look at when his walking around with a silver BLOOD jacket hello, the 45 second slow moves, and still shot. Hey the actors were doing what they were told!!!!! FYI the movie is GREAT if you watch it in fast forward......
 Post a comment

Showtimes for Today

change »

Los Angeles, CA 90025

change »
All Moviesdown
In Theaters
More Showtimes »
Coming Soon
More Coming Soon »
Go
USER REVIEWS
See all 542 User Reviews»
See all Photos»