It was still entertaining.
I thought Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton were great. However there was too much tech jargon. I don't think the Gilroy brothers Tony, the director and Dan, the writer) did a good job at explaining some of things the audience is seeing . It might have been in a longer version of this movie, but it left me baffled at times. Renner and Weisz had great chemistry. Also the climax left me deflated.
Maybe they were setting it up for another Bourne movie.
Next time Tony, you write. Bring back Peter Greengrass or
bet Brad Bird, who did a great job with Mission Impossible Four.
By the way, the movie didn't appearances byDavid Straitharn or Joan Allen. They were totally wasted as well as Albert Finney.
It's a 2-hour-15 minutes, but it moves well.
Nice afternoon matinee movie, but it could have been better.
I thought Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz and Edward Norton were great. However there was too much tech jargon. I don't think the Gilroy brothers Tony, the director and Dan, the writer) did a good job at explaining some of things the audience is seeing . It might have been in a longer version of this movie, but it left me baffled at times. Renner and Weisz had great chemistry. Also the climax left me deflated.
Maybe they were setting it up for another Bourne movie.
Next time Tony, you write. Bring back Peter Greengrass or
bet Brad Bird, who did a great job with Mission Impossible Four.
By the way, the movie didn't appearances byDavid Straitharn or Joan Allen. They were totally wasted as well as Albert Finney.
It's a 2-hour-15 minutes, but it moves well.
Nice afternoon matinee movie, but it could have been better.
Top Box Office
- 1.$116.6M
- 2.$20.7M
- 3.$11.0M
- 4.$9.6M
- 5.$8.3M
- 6.$7.1M
- 7.$6.3M
- 8.$6.3M
- 9.$4.1M
- 10.$3.0M