23 USER REVIEWS
-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Tue, May 30, 2006 11:13 AM EDT
They waited too long-7 years to be exact-to make another one. Ok sequel has some action and humor, yet feels a bit stale by now. The first two BHC's were way better in every department.more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Sun, Mar 26, 2006 9:30 PM EST
I don�fknow why this Splendid series haven�ft made after this for 10 years.This is also great movie as the others.Not only Eddie Murphy but also every supporting actor did a impressive job
in this film.I hope that more sequels will shoot.more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Jack on
Sat, Feb 18, 2006 11:00 AM EST
The third installment of the Beverly Hills Cop series. They needed to stop after #2. This was is pretty bad. Here, Axel Foley (Eddie Murphy) is back in Beverly Hills. This time, he is looking for the man who killed Inspector Todd. They found him. …more»0 of 2 people found this review helpful-
By Trisha on
Sun, Jul 10, 2005 11:35 PM EDT
and unfortunatly this is the least impressive....it appears this was made JUST to make it a trilogy....and this movie wasn't a bore by any means....but it just wasn't anywhere near as good as the second one, nor the first....worth seeing, but …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Sat, Mar 5, 2005 9:04 AM EST
I don't see why everybody is coming down on this one so hard. Everybody automatically assumes that this one is so bad because Bogomil and Taggart were nowhere to be found. I really don't see what the problem is with Axel Foley (Eddie Murphy) taking …more»2 of 2 people found this review helpful-
By Chill Wizzle on
Fri, Mar 4, 2005 6:57 AM EST
I love Eddie but this movie is pure garbage, I could probably go on and on how bad this movie is but it's not even really worth my time like that. Just check out my ratings and go from there. I just had to put my 2 cents in on this horrible a## m …more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Mon, Jan 17, 2005 12:25 PM EST
This movie was not the greatest. But it is worth buying for dvd. It's not as good as the first two movies. But stil go and buy itmore»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Thu, Dec 23, 2004 8:18 PM EST
This film was pretty entertaining and these days it is a very vital part of the filming industry to be amusing in a sense that a film's audience will remember what they viewed and also think about it. When I say entertaining I don't just refer …more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Josh on
Thu, Nov 4, 2004 6:00 PM EST
What happened to the cocky Axel Foley. It's like his whole character almost changed. His funny laugh even went. The only part really that brings out the classic Foley is when the bad guy accepts his award and Eddie goes up and talks to everybody about …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Yahoo! Movie User on
Sat, Oct 16, 2004 12:44 PM EDT
Once again again, Axel Foley is back. Why?
Several years had passed between sequels, and I assume that time wasn't spent crafting this film, because it's not very good. At least they managed to get the script done with only three people this …more»2 of 6 people found this review helpful
-
Top Box Office
- 1.$70.2M
- 2.$35.8M
- 3.$23.9M
- 4.$3.2M
- 5.$3.0M
- 6.$2.8M
- 7.$2.3M
- 8.$2.2M
- 9.$2.2M
- 10.$1.2M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-