751 USER REVIEWS
-
By ThatGirl on
Wed, Jul 1, 2009 6:01 PM EDT
It's was okay. The book was so much better. I love Tom Hanks, but it's still hard seeing him a Robert Langdon. I mean they left out the director of CERN and he's kind of important. Ah well. Won't be seeing this one again. Maybe when …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By on
Wed, Jul 1, 2009 11:55 AM EDT
Last night I went and saw Angels and Demons after I had finishing reading the book earlier this week. I was a little upset after seeing the Da Vince code when it came out after reading the book, but the first movie was oscar worthy compared to Angels …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By HistoryTechDoc on
Sun, Jun 28, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
More than any other films, The Da Vinci Code and Angels & Demons, has done a great service in giving Christians and those interested in European history the opportunity to take a clever out-of-the-box interpretation of at least one alternative view of …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By GregK on
Sat, Jun 27, 2009 8:18 PM EDT
Forget the issues between science and religion, forget if this is as good as the book, just relax and enjoy a very entertaining movie. Yes, I had read the book although nearly a year ago. In my opinion the book, Angels and Demons, is slightly better …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Tasha on
Fri, Jun 26, 2009 12:34 AM EDT
With all due respect to Tom Hanks as a general actor... he should have read both Dan Brown books and KNOWN that he was NOT Robert Langdon. I think it is complete Hollywood BS that they cast Tom Hanks for that role when he is nowhere near the part. The …more»0 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By Cormamin on
Wed, Jun 24, 2009 5:47 PM EDT
*may contain spoilers* Please note that I have not yet had a chance to read these books, but I loved this movie. I wasn't that much a fan of the first one; I liked the story, but it bored me nearly to tears. THIS ONE was worth it. It kept me guessing, …more»1 of 1 people found this review helpful-
By YumeF on
Wed, Jun 24, 2009 4:39 PM EDT
I was literally bouncing in my seat while I was watching the previews. I was so ready to see the movie after I had finished reading the book seven times.
But as I watched through, I found myself slowly becoming more and more upset with the movie. I was …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By stephanie on
Wed, Jun 24, 2009 2:45 PM EDT
there where times where movie deviated noticable from the book for the obvious fact that it would have been a five hour movie otherwise. those changes seemed to be tastefully done to keep the somewhat weak plot moving. this book and therefore the movie …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Sharon on
Tue, Jun 23, 2009 10:30 PM EDT
Liked the movie better than the book, it was entertaining and that was surprising since the book was not. Acting was what pulled this movie through, Tom Hanks was great.more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful-
By Johnathon on
Mon, Jun 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT
Tom Hanks does a stunning job, as he always does; however, the movie wasn't as memorable as it seems. Beyond Tom Hanks job, it not only took some time to get started, which means you will check your watch soon after it starts, but after the start …more»0 of 0 people found this review helpful
-
Top Box Office
- 1.$70.2M
- 2.$35.8M
- 3.$23.9M
- 4.$3.2M
- 5.$3.0M
- 6.$2.8M
- 7.$2.3M
- 8.$2.2M
- 9.$2.2M
- 10.$1.2M
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-