2012(2009)- User Reviews

2012 is a movie about the end of the world. Well... we pretty much knew that, but the action kept you on the edge of your seat, you didn't know what will happen next. It will maked you cry as you watch how they fight for their lives and when they …more»

Actuacion pobre, argumento idiota, que perdida de tiempo! No es posible que sigamos creyendo que en los Estados Unidos esta la salvacion y que en caso de una hecatombe habria una salida...more»

Cheesy. Loud and long broccoli fart. The plot....there is no plot. The world comes to and end. Some thoroughly forgettable time-wasting side stories and characters. I found it hard to stay awake...which should not happen in an action/suspense oriented …more»

If you think you know everything about physics and the earths crust and all that, then you need to let go and enjoy the movie. This is a great movie. I went and saw it with my family and they all loved it.
The acting, direction, visuals and …more»

I am a huge fan of disaster movies. Total destruction on a grand scale fascinates me. I was hooked from very early on with films such as Tower Inferno and the original Poseidon Adventure. 2012's storyline and character development is not as intricate …more»

Quite possibly the worst bit of filth to come out of the paint by numbers movie studios in the history of movies.

Take Independence day,Posiden Adventure and Armaggeddon, mash them together without editing because you want a 3 hour waste of time, and …more»

Let me begin by saying that the movie is visually stunning, and if you saw it in the theater or have a good home entertainment set-up, this movie can be a fun ride for you and the family. Even the acting is quite good for a disaster-themed movie, John …more»

2012 is an ok movie. Visuals are great, plot is great, acting is great. The only problem I had with it was it dragged on forever. It could have ended a half hour earlier. But, it was good, I don't think I want to sit and watch it again though. I reccomend …more»

This movie really was just for money the acting sucked and the story is dumb also very predictable john cusacks acting really could have been better and there was just cheesy lines and actingmore»

The visuals were stunning. John Cusack is the only actor that could have done this role and Woody Harrelson? Score!more»