2012(2009)- User Reviews

1642 USER REVIEWS
  • star22

    OK, so at least it wasn't "Deep Impact", but it also wasn't great either. Best part I think was Woody Harrelson's crazy guy character, and the initial special effects of California dropping into oblivion. It seemed like the special …more»
  • star55

    I was on the edge of my seat the entire movie. The graphics were out of this world too. Go see this movie, you will not regret it. This movie has alot of truth to it in many different ways. I loved it!!more»
  • star55

    It was awesome. Little bit dragged at the end. The graphics may have been a little overused but it wasmore»
  • star55

    the graphics were like wow!!! really freakin' awesome!!! if your that kind of guy you should definitely see this because it's a very good movie.
    the acting was meh..its not that bad..

    all in all it was a pretty good movie. for my opinion u should …more»
  • star11

    Save your money. I love movies but even I had trouble sitting through this. Good actors given a terrible script cannot pull this through. This movie made Waterworld look great. Even if this were free, I wouldn't waste 2-1/2 hours of my time.more»
  • star22

    Although it's a fiction movie, this has gone overboard with lots of sequences, specially hero can survive in the most impossible situation. There is only handful of countries making decisions about survival. The best would be American scientist communicating …more»
  • star22

    The special effects are the only thing that keeps your attention. The movie was slow to develop, and lasted about 30 minutes to long. We could not wait to get out of the theater. It was packed and if this is the best the movie makers have to offer..... …more»
  • star55

    disaster movie usually be the sme u can tell who gonna survive and not this one u couldn't tell who was or not. This was a well rounded movie had suspense, thrill, horror ( that's stuff scary if was to happen foreal) and it make u think could …more»

Pagination

(1,642 reviews)