COVERAGE OF THE 84th ANNUAL ACADEMY AWARDS

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Viola Davis? Meryl Streep? And What Ever Happened to Kirsten Dunst? The Yahoo! Best Actress Roundtable Dishes

    Photo by Weinstein Company/Walt Disney

    I enjoy sitting around with my friends and chatting about Oscars -- the discussions tend to be knowledgeable and irreverent. For our first Yahoo! roundtable I welcome my colleagues Jonathan Crow and Matt Whitfield, as well as actress-director Jordan Bayne, "Movie Mom" Nell Minow, IndieWire blogger Melissa Silverstein, Oscar obsessive Nathaniel Rogers, and the Hot Pink Pen blogger Jan Lisa Huttner. Now that the Oscar nominees have been announced, we unscrewed the top off our virtual bottle of Chardonnay and began…

    Thelma Adams: When I first looked at this race last September, I wondered whether Viola Davis was going to be considered as a leading role for "The Help," and now she's the front-runner after taking the SAG award last Sunday night. As for me, I adore Meryl -- 29 years since her last Oscar win! I also feel that if she can live with Viola Davis winning, so can I. One of them will come out on top next month, but I'm really mourning Kirsten Dunst getting completely shut out. Could that be why she was canoodling with Chris Hemsworth last week at Sundance?

    Jordan Bayne: Streep deserves to win for this performance in "The Iron Lady." Taking nothing away from any of her other remarkable performances, even I had to struggle to remember this was Streep and not Margaret Thatcher in front of me. Not even an Oscar can hold a candle to her talent.

    Matt Whitfield: A few weeks ago, I was convinced Michelle [Williams] had it in the bag. Then I boarded the Meryl train. Now, I'm thinking Rooney [Mara] has a legit shot. The academy loves an ingénue.

    Learn the latest about movies >>

    Thelma: Rooney Mara? I know the academy loves an ingénue, and Mara looks terrific in black on the red carpet, but in my mind she makes Kristen Stewart look expressive as Bella in the "Twilight" series. I feel like Rooney is constantly looking out from under her lashes for the approval of some Daddy at the corner of the screen and, in the case of "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo," that Daddy is David Fincher.

    Matt: We should be talking about Kirsten Dunst vs. Charlize Theron because they delivered the two best performances of the year. Both were robbed.

    Thelma: I'm totally with you there, Matt.

    Nathaniel Rogers: Thelma, I'm wearing black all this week as I'm also in Kiki mourning. The way she let her innate dreaminess as an actress curdle and sour for [Lars] von Trier's vision in "Melancholia" Is amazing! But, happy thoughts. "Momentum" is powerful in the awards games, and two straight years of acclaimed performances for Dunst should help her next time. I mean, look what three straight years of acclaimed work did for Tilda Swin … oh, wait!

    As for who is still in the game: Streep always amazes, but I'm distraught that even the great Streep has to do biopic mimicry to gain winner's heat. Is that the only type of acting achievement they love? Give me Viola's soulful nuance. She truly elevates her film, while Meryl's Oscar grab remains her film's only reason for even existing.

    Jonathan Crow: Dunst, Theron, and [Tilda] Swinton got robbed, but then when was the last time the winner of the best-actress category actually was the best actress of the year? (The same goes for the other top categories, too by the way..) Heck, Jessica Chastain deserved a nom for "Take Shelter."

    I'll bet that Meryl wins this year. Viola Davis gives a fine performance in a pretty disingenuous movie. I suspect, though, that this won't be the last time Davis gets nominated. She's too good not to. The academy loves giving the supporting -actress award, but not best-actress, to the ingénue, so Rooney's out. Michelle Williams deserved the Oscar for "Blue Valentine" or for "Wendy and Lucy," and I think she'll most likely take the prize if Meryl doesn't. Meryl and Michelle are both in flashy, Oscar-friendly roles playing familiar historical figures in middling movies, and both are quite good. The difference is that Meryl is due. Did [Martin] Scorsese really deserve to win for "The Departed" based on all of his movies? No, but he was due. The same logic, I'll bet, holds for Meryl.

    Matt: Can we just take a second to discuss how disappointing both "The Iron Lady" and "My Week With Marilyn" were? Both Meryl and Michelle delivered great performances, yet both films were jumbled messes.

    Thelma: I'm with you, Matt, in that I think "Marilyn" underwhelmed. It was a movie desperate for a B plot -- or some spice. I think I stand alone in believing that "The Iron Lady" works as a movie, not just as a performance. And here's another performance that got no recognition because the movie was universally dismissed starting in Venice: Andrea Riseborough as Wallis Simpson in "W.E." She was absolutely terrific, believable, human, lost in a movie that was more ambitious than successful.

    One thing we seemed to learn this year is that doing period pieces gives a performance a boost: Streep, Williams, Davis, and [Glenn] Close all played historical figures, whether based on fact or fiction. And then Mara comes in as the token ingénue. A performance like Tilda's, which is contemporary, thorny, a complex portrait of motherhood, just doesn't jibe with what is considered an Oscar-worthy performance. Agree or disagree?

    Jordan: I agree, but didn't we learn that this past year? I mean, wasn't that what we were saying about "The King's Speech"? Give us a period piece. Get an Oscar. For instance, in the best-actress category:

    2002 Nicole Kidman ("The Hours")

    2004 Charlize Theron ("Monster")

    2006 Reese Witherspoon ("Walk the Line")

    2007 Helen Mirren ("The Queen")

    2008 Marion Cotillard ("La Vie en Rose")

    2009 Kate Winslet ("The Reader")

    Jonathan: It's not period pieces that the academy likes as far as acting goes; it's mimicry: playing a recognizable public figure is the fast road to Oscar gold. Ask Marion Cotillard, Jamie Foxx, Forest Whitaker, Helen Mirren, and Nicole Kidman.

    Oscar Outrages: Best Picture >>

    Matt: The more I think about Tilda's genius performance in "We Need to Talk About Kevin," the more I realize she never had a shot at a nom. Has the stodgy academy ever nominated or awarded an actress who was willing to portray a woman ruined by motherhood? I doubt it.

    Jordan: With you on that, Matt!

    Melissa Silverstein: Here are my two cents. I think this is a two-person race between Streep and Davis. Early in the race it was Viola ahead, then Meryl picked up steam, and now I'm heading back to Viola's camp.

    I think Octavia Spencer is going to win, and that will help Viola. "The Iron Lady" just has Meryl; it's not well liked and has no coattails. But on the other hand, Meryl was able to make that film into a hit and that's impressive. We also remember that "The Help" was a very big mainstream hit with African American women in the lead, and that is something that resonates. While we so desperately need to have opportunities for African American women to play leading roles other than maids, this film offered up big, juicy roles for African American women, and I think that hits the sweet spot of Hollywood.

    And Viola has been so incredibly lovely and articulate and passionate on the awards circuit, which helps. And "The Help" is her first leading role, which blows my mind. Meryl totally blew me away, but I do think this is Viola's year.

    As for the others, Rooney won by being nominated. Michelle Williams, in my opinion, was great but has much ahead of her. And Glenn Close, what can I say? That movie left me cold. Not her fault, she was good but she just can't compete against the others.

    Lastly, I thought Kirsten Dunst was great but it didn't kill me that she wasn't nominated. It did kill me that Tilda Swinton wasn't nominated, and I truly believe she wasn't because we have a really hard time with mothers who don't live up to society's expectations. Her performance in "We Need to Talk about Kevin" was breathtaking.

    Nell Minow: For me, the best-actress category is one of the least interesting this year, somewhere under "best sound editing." They might as well hold a permanent place open for Streep in the nominations every year. Eventually she will win another Oscar, but I'd hate to see it be for this one. As deft and rich as it is, the movie's flaws make it tough to justify. I'd rather have seen her get it for "Julie & Julia" or "The Devil Wears Prada." Michelle Williams also did a lovely job in a lackluster film, but I fear it would be the imitation that is rewarded rather than the acting. If it were me, I'd give it to Viola Davis. She should also have been nominated for "Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close," where she gave a very internal and thinly written character a depth and luminosity and humanity that transcended any condescending elements in the script.

    Jan Lisa Huttner: With respect to Meryl Streep, I think the most important question is this: Why are almost none of the women who work with Streep ever recognized for their contributions in an art form that is all about team effort?

    Thelma: Well, Viola Davis did get a nom with Streep in "Doubt," along with Amy Adams and Phillip Seymour Hoffman. But, Jan, your chart on that subject raises some interesting questions.

    Matt: Thanks to Davis' SAG win, it's a two-way race 'til the end. Will Meryl hoist her third Oscar, or will Viola triumph? My money is on Viola (and everything "The Help"-related, including Octavia for supporting and the film for best pic).

    Jonathan: One year, though not this year, we should promise to give Meryl Streep every Oscar available: best actress, best supporting, best sound mixing, best makeup, and in exchange the academy never, ever has to nominate her again.

    See showtimes for your favorite movies >>

    Nathaniel: I just wrote a big gooey tribute to Viola, but what I most feel like screaming is, "I SAW HER FIRST. STEP AWAY." I literally gave her a "breakthrough" prize in 2002 for her indelible work in three small roles ("Solaris," "Far From Heaven," and "Antwone Fisher"). And I hope it happens for her this year because it's such a career moment.

    It always hurts when actors are having their best year and they're passed over, which is what's happening with Brad Pitt. What does he have to do to win awards? Age another 15 years I suppose. They do love to make the golden gods wait until they're old and grizzled.

    Nell: I totally agree on both, Nathaniel! The showoffs that impersonate celebrities, or do big detox or rage scenes, or gain or lose weight, or look ugly or act evil, they win. While the ones who make it look easy and natural are passed over.

    Thelma: The challenge is for actresses playing roles that are not as easily digestible, that are shades of gray and grayer -- like Swinton, Dunst, or Theron. As for the unbearable sadness that is Brad Pitt's life and career, Nathaniel, we'll pick up there when we hold our best actor roundtable next week.

    See the trailer for 'The Iron Lady':

    Get the official Oscars app!

     

    28 comments

    • Hilaria Villanueva  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 months ago
      I have seen both performances and it is a crime that Viola Davis is leading Meryl for the Best Actress. It infuriates me that Hollywood who wants to be seen as "oh so liberal, look at us!" will choose over Meryl who was perfect in the role. I am all for giving the blacks their due if deserved but nobody can persuade me that Halle Bewrry deserves her Oscar. They will give Viola the Oscar because they all think she is black and she may never get a chance again in the future while Meryl will alsways be nominated. Unfair.

      And before you raise the race card again I am a member of the minority myself. I am judging the Best Actress on actual performances not emotions.
    • Mr M  •  3 months ago
      NO matter who wins the Best Actress award between Viola Davis or Meryl Streep,
      it will be a well deserved win.
      Actually, I hope it will be a tie!!
    • ken l  •  Portland, Oregon  •  3 months ago
      Long ago Meryl gave a lifetime performance in Out of Africa.The academy ignored her and now 17 nominations later we have the Iron Lady.Its so un fair to this wonderful actress to tease year after year with a nomination only to slam the door on her the night of Oscar. No one alive today holds a candle to this lady and yet the academy plays this game year after year.I think its very sad.Meryl deserves to win this year.But unlike so many others I feel that the academy will play the game yet another year.To bad,its our loss.Great parts are rare.What if she retires? That would be an American loss.
    • Pramodh .  •  Santa Clara, California  •  3 months ago
      Meryl FTW. Period.
    • bluefox  •  Palo Alto, California  •  3 months ago
      where in the heck is the picture of glenn close?...she was marvelous in "albert nobbs" and i do not hear the same "press" for her as for the others. a more profoundly beautiful performance cannot be found!
    • edward  •  Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine  •  3 months ago
      Such a tough year, why wasn't Viola nominated for next year or something. I love her performance in "The Help" and could swear she had the Oscars in her bag but then watching Meryl Streep in "The Iron Lady"........that was perfection. If I were an actor I'd love to be like Meryl Streep. She has had a long history of great movies and If I'm not mistaken she should have won all the Oscars every year as far as 2004. I'd be happy if either Viola or Meryl wins. Don't like Michelle Williams and "Blue Valentine" was terrible.
    • Brenda Carter  •  Reynoldsburg, Ohio  •  3 months ago
      I hope America has had it's fill for a while of Republicans. My God when George W. was (reelected) voted in for a second term, I almost cried and wondered , what the hell were they thinking!! With four more years I belive the president can do so much good for the U,S.. Keep the faith!
      • gaby 14 days ago
        And I'm crying thinking we might have Pres.Obama as pres. for 4 more years. Horrors!!
    • Peter  •  Rolling Meadows, Illinois  •  3 months ago
      Matt, you asked if they have ever given or nominated an actress for the role of a woman ruined by motherhood...check out Mary Tyler Moore's only nomination for "Ordinary People". A woman truly ruined by motherhood and loss.
    • Cher H  •  Irvine, California  •  3 months ago
      Viola is gracious and always gives a good performance. Meryl is the best actor of our time, and she is humble and so un-Hollywood. Her wardrobe at these award's shows proves it, it's like she goes out of her way to dress wonky. She is the epitome of her profession. I've never seen her in a bad movie. I watched THE IRON LADY and if she hadn't been in it I would have stopped watching. THE HELP was so enjoyable and left me with a feeling of empathy and I forgot I was watching a movie. But why Leo never gets recognized I'll never know. Brad Pitt was great in THE DEVIL'S OWN, so we know he can act. But Leo is brilliant and versatile, like Meryl Streep. Has anyone seen a bad performance from either one of them?
    • Lori  •  3 months ago
      I've noticed that if there are any surprises with wins it is USUALLY with the supporting actress category, not the lead. I think Meryl will take the award, even if the film itself was not that great.
    • Reena  •  3 months ago
      I still say this should easily be a Streep win but the writing is on the table. The academy loves to do two things. Hand the brittish all their awards and make sure when given the chance to reward black actors so they can say... "see we aren't racist" Pay no attention to the fact that it really wasn't the best performance in that category. I still don't get their obsession with the brittish other than I think there is a fascination with the accent and it's possible there is an exchange of money and a lot of behind the scenes campaigning. Davis played every black maid role from the 60's we've already seen. Shoulders slumped. Haggard looking face and a final confrontation of the antagonist awful whitie who has done her wrong. Good enough for an oscar? Not when the competition includes an iconic actress who literally became a political living legend to such perfection you'd swear it was the actual person being filmed but Streep has no problem stepping asside each year and allowing politics within the academy family to use her for a nomination and then give it to someone elses less than performance. I wish Davis had as much class as Streep to come forward and admit this is Streeps Oscars for this performance but she won't. She's already pulled the little black girl growing up poor card at the SAG awards. She's on a role. She wants the statue for her resume and the better performance winning is not an issue. Besides Streep is so humble she's actually helping Davis when by gushing over her.
    • LuKas.  •  3 months ago
      I have not seen Melancholia. Kirsten Dunst has historically irritated with her performances which has kept me from seeing her movie. I simply cannot see her holding a candle to any of the nominated actresses...or Tilda Swinton, Charlize Theron, etc. But I'm curious. A dollar at Redbox is worth the satisfaction of my curiosity, good or bad.
    • ken l  •  Portland, Oregon  •  3 months ago
      I would like to see a repeat of 1968.That year was the only time in Oscar history where their was a Tie for Best Actress. Ill give you the winners with letters.............................#$%$K.H.One was for Funny GirlThe other for Lion in Winter
    • Kdog  •  Muskego, Wisconsin  •  3 months ago
      the iron lady - not a good movie - the flashbacks don't work and the character development is weak. streep did well but the movie was lacking. i liked the marilyn monroe flick except for the woman who played her - she had no passion and was pretty enough. when the real marilyn monroe entered a room everyone turned to watch - when this actress walked - no one cared. the help was good but davis wasn't the best actress in it.
    • Gabriel  •  3 months ago
      I think Meryl should win. the movie might not have been the best but her performance was. I also am not a big fan of Kirsten Dunst but i thought she deserved a best actress nomination for Melancholia it really was a good movie. If there was anyone that was snubbed a nomination it was Michael Fassbender for Shame.
    • Nikola  •  Montreal, Canada  •  3 months ago
      The problem is the whole film world has started to take Meryl Streep's genius as an actress for granted now, because of the number of nominations. No one seems to remember that she gets nominated because she is actually worthy of it, and many times was worthy of the award itself. Now you get bloggers and film journalists saying @#$% like "One year, though not this year, we should promise to give Meryl Streep every Oscar available: best actress, best supporting, best sound mixing, best makeup, and in exchange the academy never, ever has to nominate her again."
      I know this is just an attempt at a joke but this kind of mindset is what doesn't get her enough votes to win when she deserves it. I just hope Jonathan is right about one thing even if he doesn't believe she actually deserves it (which just sounds so silly in and of itself): that Meryl will win her third Oscar. It will be the best moment at the awards if she does and I think she has a great chance. Rooting for Meryl!
    • russ  •  Johnstown, Pennsylvania  •  3 months ago
      I find it ridiculous that Meryl Streep is losing Oscar momentum. It's not just putting on fake teeth, makeup, and a wig. Meryl Streep became Margret Thatcher. I would like to see any actress try to do what she did in The Iron Lady. Not only does Meryl deserve this Oscar, but she is definitely long overdue. Especially losing to Bullock, which was a joke. Yes, Viola is a great actress but she did not deliver the best performance this year! Viola is gaining Oscar momentum simply by the success of The Help and its ensemble cast. That is why she won the SAG award. I would find it a crime that the Academy would award Viola over Meryl, an 18th nominee. Viola couldn't even win the Golden Globe. The SAGs mean nothing. Meryl won the SAG award for Doubt and went on to lose the Oscar. Meryl Streep should not be penalized because she has countless awards and has been in the spotlight for many years. Meryl Streep is the Greatest Actress of All Time and deserves the Oscar at the end of the month!!
      • C E F 3 months ago
        Meryl Streep is a tremendous actress. When she does a role, she completely evolves into that character. In Julie, Julia I could have sworn she was Julia Childs. I have not seen "The Iron Lady" as yet, but just to see the trailer, she is Margaret Thatcher. I do not kinow of any actress, although I have a few favorites, who can "be" the character. I thought she had won the Oscar over the past couple of years, but I was wrong. I think all the contenders are worthy of the Oscar, but only one can win. Who will it be?
      • russ 3 months ago
        MERYL
      • Nikola 3 months ago
        Better be Meryl!
    • George camigla  •  Manila, Philippines  •  3 months ago
      Meryl Streep gave a superb performance as an Iron Lady and she deserve to be Oscar's Best Actress
    • DanE  •  Maidenhead, United Kingdom  •  3 months ago
      All the nominated actresses did great jobs and deserve the honors. But, when a fine ensemble film such as The Help is up for awards I can help thinking Hollywood plays the race card.

      The film’s leading actor, Emma Stone, who like all the others, did a bang-up job, is seldom mentioned. I find it disheartening that a young talent such as she gets more gossip coverage than praise for her work…But that’s Hollywood,
    • Ana Naria  •  Madrid, Spain  •  3 months ago
      Let's face it. Meryl Streep was better and hung all the weight of the movie (and when you see Streep's scenes as an older 80 years old, you realize that she is the only actress able of doing it with such brilliance. I just can't see any other actress doing it as convinzing and magnetic as she does it)... while Viola Davis was supporting role with a "sweet" role on an ensemble great cast. Viola is going to win the Oscar, but Streep deserved it more.
      • Nikola 3 months ago
        There is still hope for Meryl. Don't give it up just yet. Harvey Weinstein is in her corner, that's always a plus, and hopefully she wins the BAFTA to pick up some steam.

    FOLLOW YAHOO! MOVIES

    Pick Now
    Pick Now